All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH v14 08/74] xarray: Add documentation
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 18:59:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180617020052.4759-9-willy@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180617020052.4759-1-willy@infradead.org>

This is documentation on how to use the XArray, not details about its
internal implementation.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
 Documentation/core-api/index.rst  |   1 +
 Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 395 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 396 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
index f5a66b72f984..e821cf78be3b 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Core utilities
    local_ops
    workqueue
    genericirq
+   xarray
    flexible-arrays
    librs
    genalloc
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f8556051ddb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
+
+======
+XArray
+======
+
+:Author: Matthew Wilcox
+
+Overview
+========
+
+The XArray is an abstract data type which behaves like a very large array
+of pointers.  It meets many of the same needs as a hash or a conventional
+resizable array.  Unlike a hash, it allows you to sensibly go to the
+next or previous entry in a cache-efficient manner.  In contrast to a
+resizable array, there is no need to copy data or change MMU mappings in
+order to grow the array.  It is more memory-efficient, parallelisable
+and cache friendly than a doubly-linked list.  It takes advantage of
+RCU to perform lookups without locking.
+
+The XArray implementation is efficient when the indices used are densely
+clustered; hashing the object and using the hash as the index will not
+perform well.  The XArray is optimised for small indices, but still has
+good performance with large indices.  If your index can be larger than
+``ULONG_MAX`` then the XArray is not the data type for you.  The most
+important user of the XArray is the page cache.
+
+Each non-``NULL`` entry in the array has three bits associated with it
+called tags.  Each tag may be set or cleared independently of the others.
+You can iterate over entries which are tagged.
+
+Normal pointers may be stored in the XArray directly.  They must be 4-byte
+aligned, which is true for any pointer returned from :c:func:`kmalloc` and
+:c:func:`alloc_page`.  It isn't true for arbitrary user-space pointers,
+nor for function pointers.  You can store pointers to statically allocated
+objects, as long as those objects have an alignment of at least 4.
+
+You can also store integers between 0 and ``LONG_MAX`` in the XArray.
+You must first convert it into an entry using :c:func:`xa_mk_value`.
+When you retrieve an entry from the XArray, you can check whether it is
+a value entry by calling :c:func:`xa_is_value`, and convert it back to
+an integer by calling :c:func:`xa_to_value`.
+
+The XArray does not support storing :c:func:`IS_ERR` pointers as some
+conflict with value entries or internal entries.
+
+An unusual feature of the XArray is the ability to create entries which
+occupy a range of indices.  Once stored to, looking up any index in
+the range will return the same entry as looking up any other index in
+the range.  Setting a tag on one index will set it on all of them.
+Storing to any index will store to all of them.  Multi-index entries can
+be explicitly split into smaller entries, or storing ``NULL`` into any
+entry will cause the XArray to forget about the range.
+
+Normal API
+==========
+
+Start by initialising an XArray, either with :c:func:`DEFINE_XARRAY`
+for statically allocated XArrays or :c:func:`xa_init` for dynamically
+allocated ones.  A freshly-initialised XArray contains a ``NULL``
+pointer at every index.
+
+You can then set entries using :c:func:`xa_store` and get entries
+using :c:func:`xa_load`.  xa_store will overwrite any entry with the
+new entry and return the previous entry stored at that index.  You can
+use :c:func:`xa_erase` instead of calling :c:func:`xa_store` with a
+%NULL entry.  There is no difference between an entry that has never
+been stored to and one that has most recently had ``NULL`` stored to it.
+
+You can conditionally replace an entry at an index by using
+:c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`.  Like :c:func:`cmpxchg`, it will only succeed if
+the entry at that index has the 'old' value.  It also returns the entry
+which was at that index; if it returns the same entry which was passed as
+'old', then :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg` succeeded.
+
+If you want to only store a new entry to an index if the current entry
+at that index is ``NULL``, you can use :c:func:`xa_insert` which
+returns ``-EEXIST`` if the entry is not empty.
+
+Calling :c:func:`xa_reserve` ensures that there is enough memory allocated
+to store an entry at the specified index.  This is not normally needed,
+but some users have a complicated locking scheme.
+
+You can enquire whether a tag is set on an entry by using
+:c:func:`xa_get_tag`.  If the entry is not ``NULL``, you can set a tag
+on it by using :c:func:`xa_set_tag` and remove the tag from an entry by
+calling :c:func:`xa_clear_tag`.  You can ask whether any entry in the
+XArray has a particular tag set by calling :c:func:`xa_tagged`.
+
+You can copy entries out of the XArray into a plain array by calling
+:c:func:`xa_extract`.  Or you can iterate over the present entries in
+the XArray by calling :c:func:`xa_for_each`.  You may prefer to use
+:c:func:`xa_find` or :c:func:`xa_find_after` to move to the next present
+entry in the XArray.
+
+Finally, you can remove all entries from an XArray by calling
+:c:func:`xa_destroy`.  If the XArray entries are pointers, you may wish
+to free the entries first.  You can do this by iterating over all present
+entries in the XArray using the :c:func:`xa_for_each` iterator.
+
+Memory allocation
+-----------------
+
+The :c:func:`xa_store`, :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`, :c:func:`xa_reserve`
+and :c:func:`xa_insert` functions take a gfp_t parameter in case
+the XArray needs to allocate memory to store this entry.  If the entry
+being stored is ``NULL``, no memory allocation needs to be performed,
+and the GFP flags specified will be ignored.
+
+It is possible for no memory to be allocatable, particularly if you pass
+a restrictive set of GFP flags.  In that case, the functions return a
+special value which can be turned into an errno using :c:func:`xa_err`.
+If you don't need to know exactly which error occurred, using
+:c:func:`xa_is_err` is slightly more efficient.
+
+Locking
+-------
+
+When using the Normal API, you do not have to worry about locking.
+The XArray uses RCU and an internal spinlock to synchronise access:
+
+No lock needed:
+ * :c:func:`xa_empty`
+ * :c:func:`xa_tagged`
+
+Takes RCU read lock:
+ * :c:func:`xa_load`
+ * :c:func:`xa_for_each`
+ * :c:func:`xa_find`
+ * :c:func:`xa_find_after`
+ * :c:func:`xa_extract`
+ * :c:func:`xa_get_tag`
+
+Takes xa_lock internally:
+ * :c:func:`xa_store`
+ * :c:func:`xa_insert`
+ * :c:func:`xa_erase`
+ * :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`
+ * :c:func:`xa_reserve`
+ * :c:func:`xa_destroy`
+ * :c:func:`xa_set_tag`
+ * :c:func:`xa_clear_tag`
+
+Assumes xa_lock held on entry:
+ * :c:func:`__xa_store`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_insert`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_erase`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_cmpxchg`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_set_tag`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_clear_tag`
+
+If you want to take advantage of the lock to protect the data structures
+that you are storing in the XArray, you can call :c:func:`xa_lock`
+before calling :c:func:`xa_load`, then take a reference count on the
+object you have found before calling :c:func:`xa_unlock`.  This will
+prevent stores from removing the object from the array between looking
+up the object and incrementing the refcount.  You can also use RCU to
+avoid dereferencing freed memory, but an explanation of that is beyond
+the scope of this document.
+
+The XArray does not disable interrupts or softirqs while modifying
+the array.  It is safe to read the XArray from interrupt or softirq
+context as the RCU lock provides enough protection.
+
+If, for example, you want to store entries in the XArray in process
+context and then erase them in softirq context, you can do that this way::
+
+    void foo_init(struct foo *foo)
+    {
+        xa_init_flags(&foo->array, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_BH);
+    }
+
+    int foo_store(struct foo *foo, unsigned long index, void *entry)
+    {
+        int err;
+
+        xa_lock_bh(&foo->array);
+        err = xa_err(__xa_store(&foo->array, index, entry, GFP_KERNEL));
+        if (!err)
+            foo->count++;
+        xa_unlock_bh(&foo->array);
+        return err;
+    }
+
+    /* foo_erase() is only called from softirq context */
+    void foo_erase(struct foo *foo, unsigned long index)
+    {
+        xa_lock(&foo->array);
+        __xa_erase(&foo->array, index);
+        foo->count--;
+        xa_unlock(&foo->array);
+    }
+
+If you are going to modify the XArray from interrupt or softirq context,
+you need to initialise the array using :c:func:`xa_init_flags`, passing
+``XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ`` or ``XA_FLAGS_LOCK_BH``.
+
+The above example also shows a common pattern of wanting to extend the
+coverage of the xa_lock on the store side to protect some statistics
+associated with the array.
+
+Sharing the XArray with interrupt context is also possible, either
+using :c:func:`xa_lock_irqsave` in both the interrupt handler and process
+context, or :c:func:`xa_lock_irq` in process context and :c:func:`xa_lock`
+in the interrupt handler.
+
+Sometimes you need to protect access to the XArray with a mutex because
+that lock sits above another mutex in the locking hierarchy.  That does
+not entitle you to use functions like :c:func:`__xa_erase` without taking
+the xa_lock; the xa_lock is used for lockdep validation and will be used
+for other purposes in the future.
+
+The :c:func:`__xa_set_tag` and :c:func:`__xa_clear_tag` functions are also
+available for situations where you look up an entry and want to atomically
+set or clear a tag.  It may be more efficient to use the advanced API
+in this case, as it will save you from walking the tree twice.
+
+Advanced API
+============
+
+The advanced API offers more flexibility and better performance at the
+cost of an interface which can be harder to use and has fewer safeguards.
+No locking is done for you by the advanced API, and you are required
+to use the xa_lock while modifying the array.  You can choose whether
+to use the xa_lock or the RCU lock while doing read-only operations on
+the array.  You can mix advanced and normal operations on the same array;
+indeed the normal API is implemented in terms of the advanced API.  The
+advanced API is only available to modules with a GPL-compatible license.
+
+The advanced API is based around the xa_state.  This is an opaque data
+structure which you declare on the stack using the :c:func:`XA_STATE`
+macro.  This macro initialises the xa_state ready to start walking
+around the XArray.  It is used as a cursor to maintain the position
+in the XArray and let you compose various operations together without
+having to restart from the top every time.
+
+The xa_state is also used to store errors.  You can call
+:c:func:`xas_error` to retrieve the error.  All operations check whether
+the xa_state is in an error state before proceeding, so there's no need
+for you to check for an error after each call; you can make multiple
+calls in succession and only check at a convenient point.  The only
+errors currently generated by the xarray code itself are %ENOMEM and
+%EINVAL, but it supports arbitrary errors in case you want to call
+:c:func:`xas_set_err` yourself.
+
+If the xa_state is holding an %ENOMEM error, calling :c:func:`xas_nomem`
+will attempt to allocate more memory using the specified gfp flags and
+cache it in the xa_state for the next attempt.  The idea is that you take
+the xa_lock, attempt the operation and drop the lock.  The operation
+attempts to allocate memory while holding the lock, but it is more
+likely to fail.  Once you have dropped the lock, :c:func:`xas_nomem`
+can try harder to allocate more memory.  It will return ``true`` if it
+is worth retrying the operation (i.e. that there was a memory error *and*
+more memory was allocated).  If it has previously allocated memory, and
+that memory wasn't used, and there is no error (or some error that isn't
+%ENOMEM), then it will free the memory previously allocated.
+
+Internal Entries
+----------------
+
+The XArray reserves some entries for its own purposes.  These are never
+exposed through the normal API, but when using the advanced API, it's
+possible to see them.  Usually the best way to handle them is to pass them
+to :c:func:`xas_retry`, and retry the operation if it returns ``true``.
+
+.. flat-table::
+   :widths: 1 1 6
+
+   * - Name
+     - Test
+     - Usage
+
+   * - Node
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_node`
+     - An XArray node.  May be visible when using a multi-index xa_state.
+
+   * - Sibling
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_sibling`
+     - A non-canonical entry for a multi-index entry.  The value indicates
+       which slot in this node has the canonical entry.
+
+   * - Retry
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_retry`
+     - This entry is currently being modified by a thread which has the
+       xa_lock.  The node containing this entry may be freed at the end
+       of this RCU period.  You should restart the lookup from the head
+       of the array.
+
+Other internal entries may be added in the future.  As far as possible, they
+will be handled by :c:func:`xas_retry`.
+
+Additional functionality
+------------------------
+
+The :c:func:`xas_create_range` function allocates all the necessary memory
+to store every entry in a range.  It will set ENOMEM in the xa_state if
+it cannot allocate memory.
+
+You can use :c:func:`xas_init_tags` to reset the tags on an entry
+to their default state.  This is usually all tags clear, unless the
+XArray is marked with ``XA_FLAGS_TRACK_FREE``, in which case tag 0 is set
+and all other tags are clear.  Replacing one entry with another using
+:c:func:`xas_store` will not reset the tags on that entry; if you want
+the tags reset, you should do that explicitly.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_load` will walk the xa_state as close to the entry
+as it can.  If you know the xa_state has already been walked to the
+entry and need to check that the entry hasn't changed, you can use
+:c:func:`xas_reload` to save a function call.
+
+If you need to move to a different index in the XArray, call
+:c:func:`xas_set`.  This resets the cursor to the top of the tree, which
+will generally make the next operation walk the cursor to the desired
+spot in the tree.  If you want to move to the next or previous index,
+call :c:func:`xas_next` or :c:func:`xas_prev`.  Setting the index does
+not walk the cursor around the array so does not require a lock to be
+held, while moving to the next or previous index does.
+
+You can search for the next present entry using :c:func:`xas_find`.  This
+is the equivalent of both :c:func:`xa_find` and :c:func:`xa_find_after`;
+if the cursor has been walked to an entry, then it will find the next
+entry after the one currently referenced.  If not, it will return the
+entry at the index of the xa_state.  Using :c:func:`xas_next_entry` to
+move to the next present entry instead of :c:func:`xas_find` will save
+a function call in the majority of cases at the expense of emitting more
+inline code.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_find_tagged` function is similar.  If the xa_state has
+not been walked, it will return the entry at the index of the xa_state,
+if it is tagged.  Otherwise, it will return the first tagged entry after
+the entry referenced by the xa_state.  The :c:func:`xas_next_tagged`
+function is the equivalent of :c:func:`xas_next_entry`.
+
+When iterating over a range of the XArray using :c:func:`xas_for_each`
+or :c:func:`xas_for_each_tagged`, it may be necessary to temporarily stop
+the iteration.  The :c:func:`xas_pause` function exists for this purpose.
+After you have done the necessary work and wish to resume, the xa_state
+is in an appropriate state to continue the iteration after the entry
+you last processed.  If you have interrupts disabled while iterating,
+then it is good manners to pause the iteration and reenable interrupts
+every ``XA_CHECK_SCHED`` entries.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_get_tag`, :c:func:`xas_set_tag` and
+:c:func:`xas_clear_tag` functions require the xa_state cursor to have
+been moved to the appropriate location in the xarray; they will do
+nothing if you have called :c:func:`xas_pause` or :c:func:`xas_set`
+immediately before.
+
+You can call :c:func:`xas_set_update` to have a callback function
+called each time the XArray updates a node.  This is used by the page
+cache workingset code to maintain its list of nodes which contain only
+shadow entries.
+
+Multi-Index Entries
+-------------------
+
+The XArray has the ability to tie multiple indices together so that
+operations on one index affect all indices.  For example, storing into
+any index will change the value of the entry retrieved from any index.
+Setting or clearing a tag on any index will set or clear the tag
+on every index that is tied together.  The current implementation
+only allows tying ranges which are aligned powers of two together;
+eg indices 64-127 may be tied together, but 2-6 may not be.  This may
+save substantial quantities of memory; for example tying 512 entries
+together will save over 4kB.
+
+You can create a multi-index entry by using :c:func:`XA_STATE_ORDER`
+or :c:func:`xas_set_order` followed by a call to :c:func:`xas_store`.
+Calling :c:func:`xas_load` with a multi-index xa_state will walk
+the xa_state to the right location in the tree, but the return
+value is not meaningful, potentially being an internal entry.
+The :c:func:`xas_for_each_conflict` iterator will iterate over every
+entry which overlaps the specified range.
+
+If :c:func:`xas_load` encounters a multi-index entry, the xa_index
+in the xa_state will not be changed.  When iterating over an XArray
+or calling :c:func:`xas_find`, if the initial index is in the middle
+of a multi-index entry, it will not be altered.  Subsequent calls
+or iterations will move the index to the first index in the range.
+Each entry will only be returned once, no matter how many indices it
+occupies.
+
+Using :c:func:`xas_next` or :c:func:`xas_prev` with a multi-index xa_state
+is not supported.  Using either of these functions on a multi-index entry
+will reveal sibling entries; these should be skipped over by the caller.
+
+Storing ``NULL`` into any index of a multi-index entry will set the entry
+at every index to ``NULL`` and dissolve the tie.  Splitting a multi-index
+entry into entries occupying smaller ranges is not yet supported.
+
+Functions and structures
+========================
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/xarray.h
+.. kernel-doc:: lib/xarray.c
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 08/74] xarray: Add documentation
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 18:59:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180617020052.4759-9-willy@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180617020052.4759-1-willy@infradead.org>

This is documentation on how to use the XArray, not details about its
internal implementation.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
 Documentation/core-api/index.rst  |   1 +
 Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 395 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 396 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
index f5a66b72f984..e821cf78be3b 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/index.rst
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Core utilities
    local_ops
    workqueue
    genericirq
+   xarray
    flexible-arrays
    librs
    genalloc
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f8556051ddb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
+
+======
+XArray
+======
+
+:Author: Matthew Wilcox
+
+Overview
+========
+
+The XArray is an abstract data type which behaves like a very large array
+of pointers.  It meets many of the same needs as a hash or a conventional
+resizable array.  Unlike a hash, it allows you to sensibly go to the
+next or previous entry in a cache-efficient manner.  In contrast to a
+resizable array, there is no need to copy data or change MMU mappings in
+order to grow the array.  It is more memory-efficient, parallelisable
+and cache friendly than a doubly-linked list.  It takes advantage of
+RCU to perform lookups without locking.
+
+The XArray implementation is efficient when the indices used are densely
+clustered; hashing the object and using the hash as the index will not
+perform well.  The XArray is optimised for small indices, but still has
+good performance with large indices.  If your index can be larger than
+``ULONG_MAX`` then the XArray is not the data type for you.  The most
+important user of the XArray is the page cache.
+
+Each non-``NULL`` entry in the array has three bits associated with it
+called tags.  Each tag may be set or cleared independently of the others.
+You can iterate over entries which are tagged.
+
+Normal pointers may be stored in the XArray directly.  They must be 4-byte
+aligned, which is true for any pointer returned from :c:func:`kmalloc` and
+:c:func:`alloc_page`.  It isn't true for arbitrary user-space pointers,
+nor for function pointers.  You can store pointers to statically allocated
+objects, as long as those objects have an alignment of at least 4.
+
+You can also store integers between 0 and ``LONG_MAX`` in the XArray.
+You must first convert it into an entry using :c:func:`xa_mk_value`.
+When you retrieve an entry from the XArray, you can check whether it is
+a value entry by calling :c:func:`xa_is_value`, and convert it back to
+an integer by calling :c:func:`xa_to_value`.
+
+The XArray does not support storing :c:func:`IS_ERR` pointers as some
+conflict with value entries or internal entries.
+
+An unusual feature of the XArray is the ability to create entries which
+occupy a range of indices.  Once stored to, looking up any index in
+the range will return the same entry as looking up any other index in
+the range.  Setting a tag on one index will set it on all of them.
+Storing to any index will store to all of them.  Multi-index entries can
+be explicitly split into smaller entries, or storing ``NULL`` into any
+entry will cause the XArray to forget about the range.
+
+Normal API
+==========
+
+Start by initialising an XArray, either with :c:func:`DEFINE_XARRAY`
+for statically allocated XArrays or :c:func:`xa_init` for dynamically
+allocated ones.  A freshly-initialised XArray contains a ``NULL``
+pointer at every index.
+
+You can then set entries using :c:func:`xa_store` and get entries
+using :c:func:`xa_load`.  xa_store will overwrite any entry with the
+new entry and return the previous entry stored at that index.  You can
+use :c:func:`xa_erase` instead of calling :c:func:`xa_store` with a
+%NULL entry.  There is no difference between an entry that has never
+been stored to and one that has most recently had ``NULL`` stored to it.
+
+You can conditionally replace an entry at an index by using
+:c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`.  Like :c:func:`cmpxchg`, it will only succeed if
+the entry at that index has the 'old' value.  It also returns the entry
+which was at that index; if it returns the same entry which was passed as
+'old', then :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg` succeeded.
+
+If you want to only store a new entry to an index if the current entry
+at that index is ``NULL``, you can use :c:func:`xa_insert` which
+returns ``-EEXIST`` if the entry is not empty.
+
+Calling :c:func:`xa_reserve` ensures that there is enough memory allocated
+to store an entry at the specified index.  This is not normally needed,
+but some users have a complicated locking scheme.
+
+You can enquire whether a tag is set on an entry by using
+:c:func:`xa_get_tag`.  If the entry is not ``NULL``, you can set a tag
+on it by using :c:func:`xa_set_tag` and remove the tag from an entry by
+calling :c:func:`xa_clear_tag`.  You can ask whether any entry in the
+XArray has a particular tag set by calling :c:func:`xa_tagged`.
+
+You can copy entries out of the XArray into a plain array by calling
+:c:func:`xa_extract`.  Or you can iterate over the present entries in
+the XArray by calling :c:func:`xa_for_each`.  You may prefer to use
+:c:func:`xa_find` or :c:func:`xa_find_after` to move to the next present
+entry in the XArray.
+
+Finally, you can remove all entries from an XArray by calling
+:c:func:`xa_destroy`.  If the XArray entries are pointers, you may wish
+to free the entries first.  You can do this by iterating over all present
+entries in the XArray using the :c:func:`xa_for_each` iterator.
+
+Memory allocation
+-----------------
+
+The :c:func:`xa_store`, :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`, :c:func:`xa_reserve`
+and :c:func:`xa_insert` functions take a gfp_t parameter in case
+the XArray needs to allocate memory to store this entry.  If the entry
+being stored is ``NULL``, no memory allocation needs to be performed,
+and the GFP flags specified will be ignored.
+
+It is possible for no memory to be allocatable, particularly if you pass
+a restrictive set of GFP flags.  In that case, the functions return a
+special value which can be turned into an errno using :c:func:`xa_err`.
+If you don't need to know exactly which error occurred, using
+:c:func:`xa_is_err` is slightly more efficient.
+
+Locking
+-------
+
+When using the Normal API, you do not have to worry about locking.
+The XArray uses RCU and an internal spinlock to synchronise access:
+
+No lock needed:
+ * :c:func:`xa_empty`
+ * :c:func:`xa_tagged`
+
+Takes RCU read lock:
+ * :c:func:`xa_load`
+ * :c:func:`xa_for_each`
+ * :c:func:`xa_find`
+ * :c:func:`xa_find_after`
+ * :c:func:`xa_extract`
+ * :c:func:`xa_get_tag`
+
+Takes xa_lock internally:
+ * :c:func:`xa_store`
+ * :c:func:`xa_insert`
+ * :c:func:`xa_erase`
+ * :c:func:`xa_cmpxchg`
+ * :c:func:`xa_reserve`
+ * :c:func:`xa_destroy`
+ * :c:func:`xa_set_tag`
+ * :c:func:`xa_clear_tag`
+
+Assumes xa_lock held on entry:
+ * :c:func:`__xa_store`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_insert`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_erase`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_cmpxchg`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_set_tag`
+ * :c:func:`__xa_clear_tag`
+
+If you want to take advantage of the lock to protect the data structures
+that you are storing in the XArray, you can call :c:func:`xa_lock`
+before calling :c:func:`xa_load`, then take a reference count on the
+object you have found before calling :c:func:`xa_unlock`.  This will
+prevent stores from removing the object from the array between looking
+up the object and incrementing the refcount.  You can also use RCU to
+avoid dereferencing freed memory, but an explanation of that is beyond
+the scope of this document.
+
+The XArray does not disable interrupts or softirqs while modifying
+the array.  It is safe to read the XArray from interrupt or softirq
+context as the RCU lock provides enough protection.
+
+If, for example, you want to store entries in the XArray in process
+context and then erase them in softirq context, you can do that this way::
+
+    void foo_init(struct foo *foo)
+    {
+        xa_init_flags(&foo->array, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_BH);
+    }
+
+    int foo_store(struct foo *foo, unsigned long index, void *entry)
+    {
+        int err;
+
+        xa_lock_bh(&foo->array);
+        err = xa_err(__xa_store(&foo->array, index, entry, GFP_KERNEL));
+        if (!err)
+            foo->count++;
+        xa_unlock_bh(&foo->array);
+        return err;
+    }
+
+    /* foo_erase() is only called from softirq context */
+    void foo_erase(struct foo *foo, unsigned long index)
+    {
+        xa_lock(&foo->array);
+        __xa_erase(&foo->array, index);
+        foo->count--;
+        xa_unlock(&foo->array);
+    }
+
+If you are going to modify the XArray from interrupt or softirq context,
+you need to initialise the array using :c:func:`xa_init_flags`, passing
+``XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ`` or ``XA_FLAGS_LOCK_BH``.
+
+The above example also shows a common pattern of wanting to extend the
+coverage of the xa_lock on the store side to protect some statistics
+associated with the array.
+
+Sharing the XArray with interrupt context is also possible, either
+using :c:func:`xa_lock_irqsave` in both the interrupt handler and process
+context, or :c:func:`xa_lock_irq` in process context and :c:func:`xa_lock`
+in the interrupt handler.
+
+Sometimes you need to protect access to the XArray with a mutex because
+that lock sits above another mutex in the locking hierarchy.  That does
+not entitle you to use functions like :c:func:`__xa_erase` without taking
+the xa_lock; the xa_lock is used for lockdep validation and will be used
+for other purposes in the future.
+
+The :c:func:`__xa_set_tag` and :c:func:`__xa_clear_tag` functions are also
+available for situations where you look up an entry and want to atomically
+set or clear a tag.  It may be more efficient to use the advanced API
+in this case, as it will save you from walking the tree twice.
+
+Advanced API
+============
+
+The advanced API offers more flexibility and better performance at the
+cost of an interface which can be harder to use and has fewer safeguards.
+No locking is done for you by the advanced API, and you are required
+to use the xa_lock while modifying the array.  You can choose whether
+to use the xa_lock or the RCU lock while doing read-only operations on
+the array.  You can mix advanced and normal operations on the same array;
+indeed the normal API is implemented in terms of the advanced API.  The
+advanced API is only available to modules with a GPL-compatible license.
+
+The advanced API is based around the xa_state.  This is an opaque data
+structure which you declare on the stack using the :c:func:`XA_STATE`
+macro.  This macro initialises the xa_state ready to start walking
+around the XArray.  It is used as a cursor to maintain the position
+in the XArray and let you compose various operations together without
+having to restart from the top every time.
+
+The xa_state is also used to store errors.  You can call
+:c:func:`xas_error` to retrieve the error.  All operations check whether
+the xa_state is in an error state before proceeding, so there's no need
+for you to check for an error after each call; you can make multiple
+calls in succession and only check at a convenient point.  The only
+errors currently generated by the xarray code itself are %ENOMEM and
+%EINVAL, but it supports arbitrary errors in case you want to call
+:c:func:`xas_set_err` yourself.
+
+If the xa_state is holding an %ENOMEM error, calling :c:func:`xas_nomem`
+will attempt to allocate more memory using the specified gfp flags and
+cache it in the xa_state for the next attempt.  The idea is that you take
+the xa_lock, attempt the operation and drop the lock.  The operation
+attempts to allocate memory while holding the lock, but it is more
+likely to fail.  Once you have dropped the lock, :c:func:`xas_nomem`
+can try harder to allocate more memory.  It will return ``true`` if it
+is worth retrying the operation (i.e. that there was a memory error *and*
+more memory was allocated).  If it has previously allocated memory, and
+that memory wasn't used, and there is no error (or some error that isn't
+%ENOMEM), then it will free the memory previously allocated.
+
+Internal Entries
+----------------
+
+The XArray reserves some entries for its own purposes.  These are never
+exposed through the normal API, but when using the advanced API, it's
+possible to see them.  Usually the best way to handle them is to pass them
+to :c:func:`xas_retry`, and retry the operation if it returns ``true``.
+
+.. flat-table::
+   :widths: 1 1 6
+
+   * - Name
+     - Test
+     - Usage
+
+   * - Node
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_node`
+     - An XArray node.  May be visible when using a multi-index xa_state.
+
+   * - Sibling
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_sibling`
+     - A non-canonical entry for a multi-index entry.  The value indicates
+       which slot in this node has the canonical entry.
+
+   * - Retry
+     - :c:func:`xa_is_retry`
+     - This entry is currently being modified by a thread which has the
+       xa_lock.  The node containing this entry may be freed at the end
+       of this RCU period.  You should restart the lookup from the head
+       of the array.
+
+Other internal entries may be added in the future.  As far as possible, they
+will be handled by :c:func:`xas_retry`.
+
+Additional functionality
+------------------------
+
+The :c:func:`xas_create_range` function allocates all the necessary memory
+to store every entry in a range.  It will set ENOMEM in the xa_state if
+it cannot allocate memory.
+
+You can use :c:func:`xas_init_tags` to reset the tags on an entry
+to their default state.  This is usually all tags clear, unless the
+XArray is marked with ``XA_FLAGS_TRACK_FREE``, in which case tag 0 is set
+and all other tags are clear.  Replacing one entry with another using
+:c:func:`xas_store` will not reset the tags on that entry; if you want
+the tags reset, you should do that explicitly.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_load` will walk the xa_state as close to the entry
+as it can.  If you know the xa_state has already been walked to the
+entry and need to check that the entry hasn't changed, you can use
+:c:func:`xas_reload` to save a function call.
+
+If you need to move to a different index in the XArray, call
+:c:func:`xas_set`.  This resets the cursor to the top of the tree, which
+will generally make the next operation walk the cursor to the desired
+spot in the tree.  If you want to move to the next or previous index,
+call :c:func:`xas_next` or :c:func:`xas_prev`.  Setting the index does
+not walk the cursor around the array so does not require a lock to be
+held, while moving to the next or previous index does.
+
+You can search for the next present entry using :c:func:`xas_find`.  This
+is the equivalent of both :c:func:`xa_find` and :c:func:`xa_find_after`;
+if the cursor has been walked to an entry, then it will find the next
+entry after the one currently referenced.  If not, it will return the
+entry at the index of the xa_state.  Using :c:func:`xas_next_entry` to
+move to the next present entry instead of :c:func:`xas_find` will save
+a function call in the majority of cases at the expense of emitting more
+inline code.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_find_tagged` function is similar.  If the xa_state has
+not been walked, it will return the entry at the index of the xa_state,
+if it is tagged.  Otherwise, it will return the first tagged entry after
+the entry referenced by the xa_state.  The :c:func:`xas_next_tagged`
+function is the equivalent of :c:func:`xas_next_entry`.
+
+When iterating over a range of the XArray using :c:func:`xas_for_each`
+or :c:func:`xas_for_each_tagged`, it may be necessary to temporarily stop
+the iteration.  The :c:func:`xas_pause` function exists for this purpose.
+After you have done the necessary work and wish to resume, the xa_state
+is in an appropriate state to continue the iteration after the entry
+you last processed.  If you have interrupts disabled while iterating,
+then it is good manners to pause the iteration and reenable interrupts
+every ``XA_CHECK_SCHED`` entries.
+
+The :c:func:`xas_get_tag`, :c:func:`xas_set_tag` and
+:c:func:`xas_clear_tag` functions require the xa_state cursor to have
+been moved to the appropriate location in the xarray; they will do
+nothing if you have called :c:func:`xas_pause` or :c:func:`xas_set`
+immediately before.
+
+You can call :c:func:`xas_set_update` to have a callback function
+called each time the XArray updates a node.  This is used by the page
+cache workingset code to maintain its list of nodes which contain only
+shadow entries.
+
+Multi-Index Entries
+-------------------
+
+The XArray has the ability to tie multiple indices together so that
+operations on one index affect all indices.  For example, storing into
+any index will change the value of the entry retrieved from any index.
+Setting or clearing a tag on any index will set or clear the tag
+on every index that is tied together.  The current implementation
+only allows tying ranges which are aligned powers of two together;
+eg indices 64-127 may be tied together, but 2-6 may not be.  This may
+save substantial quantities of memory; for example tying 512 entries
+together will save over 4kB.
+
+You can create a multi-index entry by using :c:func:`XA_STATE_ORDER`
+or :c:func:`xas_set_order` followed by a call to :c:func:`xas_store`.
+Calling :c:func:`xas_load` with a multi-index xa_state will walk
+the xa_state to the right location in the tree, but the return
+value is not meaningful, potentially being an internal entry.
+The :c:func:`xas_for_each_conflict` iterator will iterate over every
+entry which overlaps the specified range.
+
+If :c:func:`xas_load` encounters a multi-index entry, the xa_index
+in the xa_state will not be changed.  When iterating over an XArray
+or calling :c:func:`xas_find`, if the initial index is in the middle
+of a multi-index entry, it will not be altered.  Subsequent calls
+or iterations will move the index to the first index in the range.
+Each entry will only be returned once, no matter how many indices it
+occupies.
+
+Using :c:func:`xas_next` or :c:func:`xas_prev` with a multi-index xa_state
+is not supported.  Using either of these functions on a multi-index entry
+will reveal sibling entries; these should be skipped over by the caller.
+
+Storing ``NULL`` into any index of a multi-index entry will set the entry
+at every index to ``NULL`` and dissolve the tie.  Splitting a multi-index
+entry into entries occupying smaller ranges is not yet supported.
+
+Functions and structures
+========================
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/xarray.h
+.. kernel-doc:: lib/xarray.c
-- 
2.17.1


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-17  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-17  1:59 [PATCH v14 00/74] Convert page cache to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 01/74] Update email address Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 02/74] radix tree test suite: Enable ubsan Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 03/74] dax: Fix use of zero page Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 04/74] xarray: Replace exceptional entries Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 05/74] xarray: Change definition of sibling entries Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 06/74] xarray: Add definition of struct xarray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 07/74] xarray: Define struct xa_node Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-06-17  1:59   ` [PATCH v14 08/74] xarray: Add documentation Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 09/74] xarray: Add XArray load operation Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 10/74] xarray: Add XArray tags Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 11/74] xarray: Add XArray unconditional store operations Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 12/74] xarray: Add XArray conditional " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 13/74] xarray: Add XArray iterators Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 14/74] xarray: Extract entries from an XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 15/74] xarray: Destroy " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 16/74] xarray: Step through " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 17/74] xarray: Add xas_for_each_conflict Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 18/74] xarray: Add xas_create_range Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 19/74] xarray: Add MAINTAINERS entry Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 20/74] page cache: Rearrange address_space Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59 ` [PATCH v14 21/74] page cache: Convert hole search to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  1:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 22/74] page cache: Add and replace pages using the XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 23/74] page cache: Convert page deletion to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 24/74] page cache: Convert find_get_entry " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 25/74] page cache: Convert find_get_entries " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 26/74] page cache: Convert find_get_pages_range " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 27/74] page cache: Convert find_get_pages_contig " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 28/74] page cache; Convert find_get_pages_range_tag " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 29/74] page cache: Convert find_get_entries_tag " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 30/74] page cache: Convert filemap_map_pages " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 31/74] radix tree test suite: Convert regression1 " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 32/74] page cache: Convert delete_batch " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 33/74] page cache: Remove stray radix comment Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 34/74] page cache: Convert filemap_range_has_page to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 35/74] mm: Convert page-writeback " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 36/74] mm: Convert workingset " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 37/74] mm: Convert truncate " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 38/74] mm: Convert add_to_swap_cache " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 39/74] mm: Convert delete_from_swap_cache " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 40/74] mm: Convert __do_page_cache_readahead " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 41/74] mm: Convert page migration " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 42/74] mm: Convert huge_memory " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 43/74] mm: Convert collapse_shmem " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 44/74] mm: Convert khugepaged_scan_shmem " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 45/74] mm: Convert is_page_cache_freeable " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 46/74] pagevec: Use xa_tag_t Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 47/74] shmem: Convert shmem_radix_tree_replace to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 48/74] shmem: Convert shmem_confirm_swap " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 49/74] shmem: Convert find_swap_entry " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 50/74] shmem: Convert shmem_add_to_page_cache " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 51/74] shmem: Convert shmem_alloc_hugepage " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 52/74] shmem: Convert shmem_free_swap " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 53/74] shmem: Convert shmem_partial_swap_usage " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 54/74] memfd: Convert memfd_wait_for_pins " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 55/74] memfd: Convert memfd_tag_pins " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 56/74] shmem: Comment fixups Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 57/74] btrfs: Convert page cache to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 58/74] fs: Convert buffer " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 59/74] fs: Convert writeback " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 60/74] nilfs2: Convert " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 61/74] f2fs: " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 62/74] dax: Rename some functions Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 63/74] dax: Hash on XArray instead of mapping Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 64/74] dax: Convert dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 65/74] dax: Convert dax_layout_busy_page " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 66/74] dax: Convert __dax_invalidate_entry " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 67/74] dax: Convert dax writeback " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 68/74] dax: Convert dax_lock_page " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-29 17:30   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-29 17:30     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-06 11:54     ` [PATCH] fs/dax: remove unused function Anders Roxell
2018-07-06 13:04     ` [PATCH v14 68/74] dax: Convert dax_lock_page to XArray Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-06 13:04       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 69/74] dax: Convert page fault handlers " Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 70/74] page cache: Finish XArray conversion Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 71/74] radix tree: Remove radix_tree_update_node_t Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 72/74] radix tree: Remove split/join code Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 73/74] radix tree: Remove radix_tree_maybe_preload_order Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00 ` [PATCH v14 74/74] radix tree: Remove radix_tree_clear_tags Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-17  2:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-19  3:12 ` [PATCH v14 00/74] Convert page cache to XArray Ross Zwisler
2018-06-19  9:22   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-19 16:40     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-19 17:16       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-27 11:05         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-27 11:05           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-27 19:44           ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-28  8:39             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-28 16:30               ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-25 21:03             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-25 21:12               ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-27 17:20               ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-27 17:20                 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-30 15:43                 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180617020052.4759-9-willy@infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.