All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel-shark-qt: Consolidate load_data_entries and load_data_records
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:35:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705123509.26f1c0c9@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <993cf66c-316a-1b7a-59a6-a5f607476667@gmail.com>

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:39:01 +0300
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com> wrote:

Your comment actually had me re-examine the code, and I found a bug.

> >   
> > +struct rec_list {
> > +	struct pevent_record	*rec;
> > +	struct rec_list		*next;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void free_rec_list(struct rec_list **rec_list, int n_cpus)
> > +{
> > +	struct rec_list *temp_rec;
> > +	int cpu;
> > +
> > +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < n_cpus; ++cpu) {
> > +		while (rec_list[cpu]) {
> > +			temp_rec = rec_list[cpu];
> > +			rec_list[cpu] = temp_rec->next;

I need a:

			free_record(temp_rec->rec);


> > +			free(temp_rec);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	free(rec_list);
> > +}
> > +


> > @@ -521,9 +587,11 @@ ssize_t kshark_load_data_entries(struct kshark_context *kshark_ctx,
> >   				struct kshark_entry ***data_rows)
> >   {
> >   	struct event_filter *adv_filter = kshark_ctx->advanced_event_filter;
> > -	struct kshark_entry **cpu_list, **rows;
> > -	struct kshark_entry *entry, **next;
> >   	struct kshark_task_list *task;
> > +	struct kshark_entry **rows;
> > +	struct kshark_entry *entry;
> > +	struct rec_list **rec_list;
> > +	struct rec_list *temp_rec;
> >   	struct pevent_record *rec;
> >   	int cpu, n_cpus, next_cpu;
> >   	size_t count, total = 0;
> > @@ -533,24 +601,41 @@ ssize_t kshark_load_data_entries(struct kshark_context *kshark_ctx,
> >   	if (*data_rows)
> >   		free(*data_rows);
> >   
> > +	total = get_records(kshark_ctx, &rec_list);
> > +	if (total < 0)
> > +		goto fail;
> > +
> > +	rows = calloc(total, sizeof(struct kshark_entry *));
> > +	if(!rows)
> > +		goto fail;
> > +
> >   	n_cpus = tracecmd_cpus(kshark_ctx->handle);
> > -	cpu_list = calloc(n_cpus, sizeof(struct kshark_entry *));
> >   
> > -	for (cpu = 0; cpu < n_cpus; ++cpu) {
> > -		count = 0;
> > -		cpu_list[cpu] = NULL;
> > -		next = &cpu_list[cpu];
> > +	for (count = 0; count < total; count++) {
> > +		ts = 0;
> > +		next_cpu = -1;
> > +		for (cpu = 0; cpu < n_cpus; ++cpu) {
> > +			if (!rec_list[cpu])
> > +				continue;
> >   
> > -		rec = tracecmd_read_cpu_first(kshark_ctx->handle, cpu);
> > -		while (rec) {
> > -			*next = entry = malloc(sizeof(struct kshark_entry));
> > +			if (!ts || rec_list[cpu]->rec->ts < ts) {
> > +				ts = rec_list[cpu]->rec->ts;
> > +				next_cpu = cpu;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (next_cpu >= 0) {
> > +			entry = malloc(sizeof(struct kshark_entry));
> >   			if (!entry)
> > -				goto fail;
> > +				goto fail_free;
> > +
> > +			rec = rec_list[next_cpu]->rec;
> > +			rows[count] = entry;
> >   
> >   			kshark_set_entry_values(kshark_ctx, rec, entry);
> >   			task = kshark_add_task(kshark_ctx, entry->pid);
> >   			if (!task)
> > -				goto fail;
> > +				goto fail_free;
> >   
> >   			/* Apply event filtering. */
> >   			ret = FILTER_NONE;
> > @@ -567,47 +652,26 @@ ssize_t kshark_load_data_entries(struct kshark_context *kshark_ctx,
> >   				entry->visible &= ~kshark_ctx->filter_mask;
> >   			}
> >   
> > -			entry->next = NULL;
> > -			next = &entry->next;
> > +			temp_rec = rec_list[next_cpu];
> > +			rec_list[next_cpu] = rec_list[next_cpu]->next;
> > +			free(temp_rec);

I should add a comment here:

			/* The record will no longer be referenced */

> >   			free_record(rec);
> > -
> > -			++count;
> > -			rec = tracecmd_read_data(kshark_ctx->handle, cpu);
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		total += count;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	rows = calloc(total, sizeof(struct kshark_entry *));
> > -	if (!rows)
> > -		goto fail;
> > -
> > -	count = 0;
> > -	while (count < total) {
> > -		ts = 0;
> > -		next_cpu = -1;
> > -		for (cpu = 0; cpu < n_cpus; ++cpu) {
> > -			if (!cpu_list[cpu])
> > -				continue;
> > -
> > -			if (!ts || cpu_list[cpu]->ts < ts) {
> > -				ts = cpu_list[cpu]->ts;
> > -				next_cpu = cpu;
> > -			}
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		if (next_cpu >= 0) {
> > -			rows[count] = cpu_list[next_cpu];
> > -			cpu_list[next_cpu] = cpu_list[next_cpu]->next;
> >   		}
> > -		++count;
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	free(cpu_list);
> > +	free_rec_list(rec_list, n_cpus);
> >   	*data_rows = rows;
> >   	return total;
> >   
> > -fail:
> > + fail_free:
> > +	free_rec_list(rec_list, n_cpus);
> > +	for (count = 0; count < total; count++) {
> > +		if (!rows[count])
> > +			break;
> > +		free(rows[count]);
> > +	}
> > +	free(rows);
> > + fail:
> >   	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate memory during data loading.\n");
> >   	return -ENOMEM;
> >   }
> > @@ -625,82 +689,60 @@ fail:
> >   ssize_t kshark_load_data_records(struct kshark_context *kshark_ctx,
> >   				struct pevent_record ***data_rows)
> >   {

[..]

> >   	rows = calloc(total, sizeof(struct pevent_record *));
> > -	if (!rows)
> > +	if(!rows)
> >   		goto fail;
> >   
> > -	count = 0;
> > -	while (count < total) {
> > +	n_cpus = tracecmd_cpus(kshark_ctx->handle);
> > +
> > +	for (count = 0; count < total; count++) {
> >   		ts = 0;
> >   		next_cpu = -1;
> >   		for (cpu = 0; cpu < n_cpus; ++cpu) {
> > -			if (!cpu_list[cpu])
> > +			if (!rec_list[cpu])
> >   				continue;
> >   
> > -			if (!ts || cpu_list[cpu]->rec->ts < ts) {
> > -				ts = cpu_list[cpu]->rec->ts;
> > +			if (!ts || rec_list[cpu]->rec->ts < ts) {
> > +				ts = rec_list[cpu]->rec->ts;
> >   				next_cpu = cpu;
> >   			}
> >   		}
> >   
> >   		if (next_cpu >= 0) {
> > -			rows[count] = cpu_list[next_cpu]->rec;
> > -			temp_rec = cpu_list[next_cpu];
> > -			cpu_list[next_cpu] = cpu_list[next_cpu]->next;
> > -			free (temp_rec);
> > -		}
> > +			rec = rec_list[next_cpu]->rec;
> > +			rows[count] = rec;
> >   
> > -		++count;
> > +			pid = pevent_data_pid(kshark_ctx->pevent, rec);
> > +			task = kshark_add_task(kshark_ctx, pid);
> > +			if (!task)
> > +				goto fail;
> > +
> > +			temp_rec = rec_list[next_cpu];
> > +			rec_list[next_cpu] = rec_list[next_cpu]->next;
> > +			free(temp_rec);
> > +			free_record(rec);  
> 
> You have to free only the element of the list.
> The user is responsible for freeing the record.

Right! And I'll replace that with a comment:

			/* The record is still referenced in rows */

Thanks for the review.

-- Steve

> 
> > +		}
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	free(cpu_list);
> > +	free_rec_list(rec_list, n_cpus);
> >   	*data_rows = rows;
> >   	return total;
> >   
> > -fail:
> > + fail:
> >   	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate memory during data loading.\n");
> >   	return -ENOMEM;
> >   }
> >   

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03 16:21 [PATCH 2/3] kernel-shark-qt: Consolidate load_data_entries and load_data_records Steven Rostedt
2018-07-04 11:39 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-05 14:47   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 14:53     ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-05 15:48       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 16:08   ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-05 16:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 16:35   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-07-05 16:38     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-05 22:05   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 10:51     ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-06 11:36       ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-06 12:46     ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-06 18:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 18:43         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-09 15:54         ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2018-07-06 18:24       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-09 15:54         ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180705123509.26f1c0c9@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=y.karadz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.