All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:13:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716151352.vqw43lcf4e7zmk55@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxhDyzMuJ67Yr8Y5Vbq6NqJJiqqWi+Rv-2D6aDRki9Qkgw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 11-07-18 13:48:58, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> Allocate fsnotify mark independently instead of embedding it inside
> >> chunk. This will allow us to just replace chunk attached to mark when
> >> growing / shrinking chunk instead of replacing mark attached to inode
> >> which is a more complex operation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >
> > Ack.
> 
> Found minor nit.
> 
> [...]
> >> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *AUDIT_M(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> >> +{
> >> +       return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, fsn_mark);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> >>  {
> >> -       struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> >> +       struct audit_chunk *chunk = AUDIT_M(entry)->chunk;
> >>         audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> >> +       kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, entry);
> 
> Technically, we should be freeing AUDIT_M(entry)
> although it is the same address with current struct layout.

Right, thanks for spotting this. Fixed in my tree.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:13:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716151352.vqw43lcf4e7zmk55@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxhDyzMuJ67Yr8Y5Vbq6NqJJiqqWi+Rv-2D6aDRki9Qkgw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 11-07-18 13:48:58, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> Allocate fsnotify mark independently instead of embedding it inside
> >> chunk. This will allow us to just replace chunk attached to mark when
> >> growing / shrinking chunk instead of replacing mark attached to inode
> >> which is a more complex operation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >
> > Ack.
> 
> Found minor nit.
> 
> [...]
> >> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *AUDIT_M(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> >> +{
> >> +       return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, fsn_mark);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> >>  {
> >> -       struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
> >> +       struct audit_chunk *chunk = AUDIT_M(entry)->chunk;
> >>         audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> >> +       kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, entry);
> 
> Technically, we should be freeing AUDIT_M(entry)
> although it is the same address with current struct layout.

Right, thanks for spotting this. Fixed in my tree.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-16 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-10 10:02 [PATCH 0/10 v2] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04  9:53     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04  9:53       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 10:00     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 10:00       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  7:58   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  7:58     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:26     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:26       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:01       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:01         ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:23         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:23           ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:57     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-16 15:13       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-07-16 15:13         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:03     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:03       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11 14:17   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 14:17     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:11     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:11       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/10 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180716151352.vqw43lcf4e7zmk55@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.