All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix rdma queue mapping
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:04:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821020434.GA24247@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180820205420.25908-1-sagi@grimberg.me>

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> nvme-rdma attempts to map queues based on irq vector affinity.
> However, for some devices, completion vector irq affinity is
> configurable by the user which can break the existing assumption
> that irq vectors are optimally arranged over the host cpu cores.
> 
> So we map queues in two stages:
> First map queues according to corresponding to the completion
> vector IRQ affinity taking the first cpu in the vector affinity map.
> if the current irq affinity is arranged such that a vector is not
> assigned to any distinct cpu, we map it to a cpu that is on the same
> node. If numa affinity can not be sufficed, we map it to any unmapped
> cpu we can find. Then, map the remaining cpus in the possible cpumap
> naively.

I guess this way still can't fix the request allocation crash issue
triggered by using blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(), in which one hw queue may
not be mapped from any online CPU.

Maybe this patch isn't for this issue, but it is closely related.

Thanks,
Ming

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: fix rdma queue mapping
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:04:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821020434.GA24247@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180820205420.25908-1-sagi@grimberg.me>

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018@01:54:20PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> nvme-rdma attempts to map queues based on irq vector affinity.
> However, for some devices, completion vector irq affinity is
> configurable by the user which can break the existing assumption
> that irq vectors are optimally arranged over the host cpu cores.
> 
> So we map queues in two stages:
> First map queues according to corresponding to the completion
> vector IRQ affinity taking the first cpu in the vector affinity map.
> if the current irq affinity is arranged such that a vector is not
> assigned to any distinct cpu, we map it to a cpu that is on the same
> node. If numa affinity can not be sufficed, we map it to any unmapped
> cpu we can find. Then, map the remaining cpus in the possible cpumap
> naively.

I guess this way still can't fix the request allocation crash issue
triggered by using blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(), in which one hw queue may
not be mapped from any online CPU.

Maybe this patch isn't for this issue, but it is closely related.

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-20 20:54 [PATCH v2] block: fix rdma queue mapping Sagi Grimberg
2018-08-20 20:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-08-21  2:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-08-21  2:04   ` Ming Lei
2018-08-25  2:06   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-08-25  2:06     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-08-25 12:18     ` Steve Wise
2018-08-25 12:18       ` Steve Wise
2018-08-27  3:50       ` Ming Lei
2018-08-27  3:50         ` Ming Lei
2018-08-22 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-22 13:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-25  2:17   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-08-25  2:17     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-03 19:05     ` Steve Wise
2018-10-03 19:05       ` Steve Wise
2018-10-03 21:14       ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-03 21:14         ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-03 21:21         ` Steve Wise
2018-10-03 21:21           ` Steve Wise
2018-10-16  1:04         ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-16  1:04           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-17 16:37           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 16:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 16:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 16:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-23  6:02         ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-23  6:02           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-23 13:00           ` Steve Wise
2018-10-23 13:00             ` Steve Wise
2018-10-23 21:25             ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-23 21:25               ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-23 21:31               ` Steve Wise
2018-10-23 21:31                 ` Steve Wise
2018-10-24  0:09               ` Shiraz Saleem
2018-10-24  0:09                 ` Shiraz Saleem
2018-10-24  0:37                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-24  0:37                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-29 23:58                   ` Saleem, Shiraz
2018-10-29 23:58                     ` Saleem, Shiraz
2018-10-30 18:26                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-30 18:26                       ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180821020434.GA24247@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.