All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: denkenz@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] TPMLIB: Break TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:49:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824084930.GA10266@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824075227.GG3584@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52:27AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:57:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Break the TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c into their own call wrapper
> > library.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> I think the very first steps that we should take would be to make TPM
> subsystem to use struct tpm_buf internally for everything and convert
> tpm_send() to take tpm_buf instead of a raw buffer.
> 
> For TPM 2.0 the subsystem already uses tpm_buf. I remember Tomas Winkler
> working on to do the same for TPM 1.x.
> 
> After that it would make sense to convert TPM 1.x to use struct tpm_buf to
> construct commands.
> 
> After all of this is done it is possible to evaluate these changes.
> 
> BTW right now there is call wrapper interface provided by the TPM
> subsystem for TPM 2.0 trusted keys. Not sure if this has been the
> right design choice. TPM 1.x and TPM 2.0 trusted keys implementations
> live in different subsystems ATM, which at least somewhat wrong.

Tomas' patches are scattered here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10261169/

I could rebase them and make a patch set out of them when I have time.

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/23] TPMLIB: Break TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:49:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824084930.GA10266@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824075227.GG3584@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52:27AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:57:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Break the TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c into their own call wrapper
> > library.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> I think the very first steps that we should take would be to make TPM
> subsystem to use struct tpm_buf internally for everything and convert
> tpm_send() to take tpm_buf instead of a raw buffer.
> 
> For TPM 2.0 the subsystem already uses tpm_buf. I remember Tomas Winkler
> working on to do the same for TPM 1.x.
> 
> After that it would make sense to convert TPM 1.x to use struct tpm_buf to
> construct commands.
> 
> After all of this is done it is possible to evaluate these changes.
> 
> BTW right now there is call wrapper interface provided by the TPM
> subsystem for TPM 2.0 trusted keys. Not sure if this has been the
> right design choice. TPM 1.x and TPM 2.0 trusted keys implementations
> live in different subsystems ATM, which at least somewhat wrong.

Tomas' patches are scattered here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10261169/

I could rebase them and make a patch set out of them when I have time.

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: denkenz@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] TPMLIB: Break TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:49:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824084930.GA10266@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824075227.GG3584@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52:27AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:57:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Break the TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c into their own call wrapper
> > library.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> I think the very first steps that we should take would be to make TPM
> subsystem to use struct tpm_buf internally for everything and convert
> tpm_send() to take tpm_buf instead of a raw buffer.
> 
> For TPM 2.0 the subsystem already uses tpm_buf. I remember Tomas Winkler
> working on to do the same for TPM 1.x.
> 
> After that it would make sense to convert TPM 1.x to use struct tpm_buf to
> construct commands.
> 
> After all of this is done it is possible to evaluate these changes.
> 
> BTW right now there is call wrapper interface provided by the TPM
> subsystem for TPM 2.0 trusted keys. Not sure if this has been the
> right design choice. TPM 1.x and TPM 2.0 trusted keys implementations
> live in different subsystems ATM, which at least somewhat wrong.

Tomas' patches are scattered here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10261169/

I could rebase them and make a patch set out of them when I have time.

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	keyrings-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-integrity-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	denkenz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] TPMLIB: Break TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:49:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824084930.GA10266@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824075227.GG3584-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52:27AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:57:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Break the TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c into their own call wrapper
> > library.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I think the very first steps that we should take would be to make TPM
> subsystem to use struct tpm_buf internally for everything and convert
> tpm_send() to take tpm_buf instead of a raw buffer.
> 
> For TPM 2.0 the subsystem already uses tpm_buf. I remember Tomas Winkler
> working on to do the same for TPM 1.x.
> 
> After that it would make sense to convert TPM 1.x to use struct tpm_buf to
> construct commands.
> 
> After all of this is done it is possible to evaluate these changes.
> 
> BTW right now there is call wrapper interface provided by the TPM
> subsystem for TPM 2.0 trusted keys. Not sure if this has been the
> right design choice. TPM 1.x and TPM 2.0 trusted keys implementations
> live in different subsystems ATM, which at least somewhat wrong.

Tomas' patches are scattered here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10261169/

I could rebase them and make a patch set out of them when I have time.

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 15:56 tpm: Provide a TPM access library David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56 ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56 ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56 ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56 ` [PATCH 01/23] TPM: Add new TPMs to the tail of the list to prevent inadvertent change of dev David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:56   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:30   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:30     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:30     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:30     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-24  6:24     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:25       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24 11:22         ` Mimi Zohar
2018-08-24 11:22           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-08-24 11:22           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-08-24 11:22           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-08-24  6:19   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:19     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:19     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:19     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 02/23] TPM: Provide a facility for a userspace TPM emulator David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-24  6:29     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:29       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:29       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:29       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 03/23] TPM: Provide a platform driver for the user emulator driver David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-24  6:30   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:30     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:30     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  6:30     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 04/23] TPM: Expose struct tpm_chip and related find_get and put functions David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-21 18:35   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:35     ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:35     ` David Howells
2018-08-21 18:35     ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 05/23] TPM: Use struct tpm_chip rather than chip number as interface parameter David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-24  7:42   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:42     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:42     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:42     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 06/23] TPM: Move ordinal values from interface file to header with other ordinals David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 07/23] TPM: Consolidate tpm_send(), transmit_cmd() and tpm_transmit() David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 08/23] TPMLIB: Break TPM bits out of security/keys/trusted.c David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-24  7:52   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  7:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  8:49     ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-08-24  8:49       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  8:49       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  8:49       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-24  9:33     ` David Howells
2018-08-24  9:33       ` David Howells
2018-08-24  9:33       ` David Howells
2018-08-24  9:33       ` David Howells
2018-08-27  8:25       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-27  8:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-27  8:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-27  8:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 09/23] TPMLIB: Do some source cleanups David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57 ` [PATCH 10/23] TPMLIB: Better format calls to TSS_*hmac*() David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:57   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 11/23] TPMLIB: Put banner comments on public TPM library functions David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 12/23] TPMLIB: Create tpm_{even, odd}_nonce structs to represent nonces David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 13/23] TPMLIB: Rename store8() and storebytes() David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 14/23] TPMLIB: Make store_s() take a void* data argument, not unsigned char* David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 15/23] TPMLIB: Use __be32 rather than int32_t and use cpu_to_beX() and co David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 16/23] TPMLIB: Put more comments into the HMAC generation functions David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 17/23] TPMLIB: Provide a wrapper to load bytes out of the reply David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 18/23] TPMLIB: Encapsulate XOR-based encryption with authkey derivative David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 19/23] TPMLIB: Add some debugging code David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:58   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 20/23] TPMLIB: Implement call to TPM_CreateWrapKey David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 21/23] TPMLIB: Implement call to TPM_LoadKey2 David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 22/23] TPMLIB: Provide call for TPM_FlushSpecific David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 23/23] TPM: Add an asymmetric key subtype for handling TPM-based keys David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-21 15:59   ` David Howells
2018-08-22 14:19 ` tpm: Provide a TPM access library Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-22 14:19   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-22 14:19   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-22 14:19   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-22 14:45 ` David Howells
2018-08-22 14:45   ` David Howells
2018-08-22 14:45   ` David Howells
2018-08-22 14:45   ` David Howells
2018-08-23 22:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-23 22:49     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-23 22:49     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-08-23 22:49     ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824084930.GA10266@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denkenz@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.