All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, bp@suse.de, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:56:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016025657.GB13006@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921073211.20097-1-lijiang@redhat.com>

On 09/21/18 at 03:32pm, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> E820 reserved ranges is useful in kdump kernel, we have added this in
> kexec-tools code.
> 
> One reason is PCI mmconf (extended mode) requires reserved region otherwise
> it falls back to legacy mode.
> 
> Furthermore, when AMD SME kdump support, it needs to map dmi table area as
> unencrypted. For normal boot, these ranges sit in e820 reserved ranges,
> thus the early ioremap code naturally map them as unencrypted. If we also
> have same e820 reserve setup in kdump kernel then it will just work like
> normal kernel.
> 
> Kdump uses walk_iomem_res_desc to iterate resources, then adds matched desc
> to e820 table for the kdump kernel.
> 
> But IORES_DESC_NONE resource type includes several different e820 types, we
> need add exact e820 type to the kdump kernel e820 table, thus it also needs
> an extra checking in memmap_entry_callback() to match the e820 type and
> resource name.
> 
> By the way, we also fix an error which walks through iomem resources, the
> values of the function parameter may be modified in the while loop of
> __walk_iomem_res_desc(), which will cause us to not get the desired result
> in some cases.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Modified the value of flags to "0", when walking through the whole
> tree for e820 reserved ranges.
> 2. Modified the invalid SOB chain issue.
> 
> Lianbo Jiang (3):
>   resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources
>   x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io
>     resource name
>   x86/kexec_file: add reserved e820 ranges to kdump kernel e820 table

Lianbo, since Bjorn has fixed the resource issue in another patchset,
can you rebase your patch 2 and 3 on top of his patches and resend?

> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c         | 11 ++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c          |  2 +-
>  kernel/resource.c               |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Thanks
Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:56:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016025657.GB13006@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921073211.20097-1-lijiang@redhat.com>

On 09/21/18 at 03:32pm, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> E820 reserved ranges is useful in kdump kernel, we have added this in
> kexec-tools code.
> 
> One reason is PCI mmconf (extended mode) requires reserved region otherwise
> it falls back to legacy mode.
> 
> Furthermore, when AMD SME kdump support, it needs to map dmi table area as
> unencrypted. For normal boot, these ranges sit in e820 reserved ranges,
> thus the early ioremap code naturally map them as unencrypted. If we also
> have same e820 reserve setup in kdump kernel then it will just work like
> normal kernel.
> 
> Kdump uses walk_iomem_res_desc to iterate resources, then adds matched desc
> to e820 table for the kdump kernel.
> 
> But IORES_DESC_NONE resource type includes several different e820 types, we
> need add exact e820 type to the kdump kernel e820 table, thus it also needs
> an extra checking in memmap_entry_callback() to match the e820 type and
> resource name.
> 
> By the way, we also fix an error which walks through iomem resources, the
> values of the function parameter may be modified in the while loop of
> __walk_iomem_res_desc(), which will cause us to not get the desired result
> in some cases.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Modified the value of flags to "0", when walking through the whole
> tree for e820 reserved ranges.
> 2. Modified the invalid SOB chain issue.
> 
> Lianbo Jiang (3):
>   resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources
>   x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io
>     resource name
>   x86/kexec_file: add reserved e820 ranges to kdump kernel e820 table

Lianbo, since Bjorn has fixed the resource issue in another patchset,
can you rebase your patch 2 and 3 on top of his patches and resend?

> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c         | 11 ++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c          |  2 +-
>  kernel/resource.c               |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Thanks
Dave

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21  7:32 [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-24 17:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 17:52     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  7:08     ` lijiang
2018-09-25  7:08       ` lijiang
2018-09-24 22:14   ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15     ` [PATCH 3/3] resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  8:58       ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25  8:58         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20           ` Baoquan He
2018-09-27  5:27       ` lijiang
2018-09-27  5:27         ` lijiang
2018-09-27 14:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:03           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28  5:09           ` lijiang
2018-09-28  5:09             ` lijiang
2018-09-28 13:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-28 13:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-26  9:22     ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes lijiang
2018-09-26  9:22       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36         ` lijiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io resource name Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add reserved e820 ranges to kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-10-16  2:56 ` Dave Young [this message]
2018-10-16  2:56   ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the " Dave Young
2018-10-16  3:45   ` lijiang
2018-10-16  3:45     ` lijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181016025657.GB13006@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.