All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
To: palmer@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, keescook@chromium.org,
	luto@amacapital.net, wad@chromium.org, green.hu@gmail.com,
	deanbo422@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: fix syscall_{get,set}_arguments
Date: Thu,  6 Dec 2018 16:01:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206150156.28210-3-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181206150156.28210-1-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>

Testing with libseccomp master branch revealed that testcases with
filters on syscall arguments were failing due to wrong values. Seccomp
uses syscall_get_argumentsi() to copy syscall arguments, and there is a
bug in pointer arithmetics in memcpy() call.

Two alternative implementation were tested: the one in this patch and
another one based on while-break loop. Both delivered the same results.

This implementation is also used in arm, arm64 and nds32 arches.

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
index bba3da6ef157..26ceb434a433 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
@@ -70,19 +70,32 @@ static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
 	regs->a0 = (long) error ?: val;
 }
 
+#define SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS 6
+
 static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
 					 struct pt_regs *regs,
 					 unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
 					 unsigned long *args)
 {
-	BUG_ON(i + n > 6);
+	if (n == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (i + n > SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS) {
+		unsigned long *args_bad = args + SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS - i;
+		unsigned int n_bad = n + i - SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS;
+		pr_warning("%s called with max args %d, handling only %d\n",
+			__func__, i + n, SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS);
+		memset(args_bad, 0, n_bad * sizeof(args[0]));
+	}
+
 	if (i == 0) {
 		args[0] = regs->orig_a0;
 		args++;
 		i++;
 		n--;
 	}
-	memcpy(args, &regs->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), n * sizeof(args[0]));
+
+	memcpy(args, &regs->a0 + i, n * sizeof(args[0]));
 }
 
 static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
@@ -90,14 +103,23 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
 					 unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
 					 const unsigned long *args)
 {
-	BUG_ON(i + n > 6);
-        if (i == 0) {
-                regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
-                args++;
-                i++;
-                n--;
-        }
-	memcpy(&regs->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), args, n * sizeof(regs->a0));
+	if (n == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (i + n > SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS) {
+		pr_warning("%s called with max args %d, handling only %d\n",
+			__func__, i + n, SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS);
+		n = SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS - i;
+	}
+
+	if (i == 0) {
+		regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
+		args++;
+		i++;
+		n--;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(&regs->a0 + i, args, n * sizeof(args[0]));
 }
 
 static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
-- 
2.19.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
To: palmer@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, keescook@chromium.org,
	luto@amacapital.net, wad@chromium.org, green.hu@gmail.com,
	deanbo422@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: fix syscall_{get,set}_arguments
Date: Thu,  6 Dec 2018 16:01:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206150156.28210-3-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181206150156.28210-1-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>

Testing with libseccomp master branch revealed that testcases with
filters on syscall arguments were failing due to wrong values. Seccomp
uses syscall_get_argumentsi() to copy syscall arguments, and there is a
bug in pointer arithmetics in memcpy() call.

Two alternative implementation were tested: the one in this patch and
another one based on while-break loop. Both delivered the same results.

This implementation is also used in arm, arm64 and nds32 arches.

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
index bba3da6ef157..26ceb434a433 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
@@ -70,19 +70,32 @@ static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
 	regs->a0 = (long) error ?: val;
 }
 
+#define SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS 6
+
 static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
 					 struct pt_regs *regs,
 					 unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
 					 unsigned long *args)
 {
-	BUG_ON(i + n > 6);
+	if (n == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (i + n > SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS) {
+		unsigned long *args_bad = args + SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS - i;
+		unsigned int n_bad = n + i - SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS;
+		pr_warning("%s called with max args %d, handling only %d\n",
+			__func__, i + n, SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS);
+		memset(args_bad, 0, n_bad * sizeof(args[0]));
+	}
+
 	if (i == 0) {
 		args[0] = regs->orig_a0;
 		args++;
 		i++;
 		n--;
 	}
-	memcpy(args, &regs->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), n * sizeof(args[0]));
+
+	memcpy(args, &regs->a0 + i, n * sizeof(args[0]));
 }
 
 static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
@@ -90,14 +103,23 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
 					 unsigned int i, unsigned int n,
 					 const unsigned long *args)
 {
-	BUG_ON(i + n > 6);
-        if (i == 0) {
-                regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
-                args++;
-                i++;
-                n--;
-        }
-	memcpy(&regs->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), args, n * sizeof(regs->a0));
+	if (n == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (i + n > SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS) {
+		pr_warning("%s called with max args %d, handling only %d\n",
+			__func__, i + n, SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS);
+		n = SYSCALL_MAX_ARGS - i;
+	}
+
+	if (i == 0) {
+		regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
+		args++;
+		i++;
+		n--;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(&regs->a0 + i, args, n * sizeof(args[0]));
 }
 
 static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
-- 
2.19.2


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06 15:01 [PATCH 0/2] riscv: add support for SECCOMP and SECCOMP_FILTER David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 15:01 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: add support for SECCOMP incl. filters David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 15:01   ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 16:47   ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 16:47     ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:10     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 17:10       ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 16:51   ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 16:51     ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:11     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 17:11       ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 18:25     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 18:25       ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 18:32       ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 18:32         ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:06   ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:06     ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:12     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 17:12       ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 15:01 ` David Abdurachmanov [this message]
2018-12-06 15:01   ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: fix syscall_{get,set}_arguments David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 16:48   ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 16:48     ` Kees Cook
2018-12-06 17:13     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-12-06 17:13       ` David Abdurachmanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181206150156.28210-3-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com \
    --to=david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.