From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Dr. Greg" <greg@enjellic.com>
Cc: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: x86/sgx: uapi change proposal
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 12:34:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220103400.GC26410@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181219144343.GA31189@wind.enjellic.com>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 08:43:43AM -0600, Dr. Greg wrote:
> I believe it is a silent response to the issues we were prosecuting
> 4-5 weeks ago, regarding the requirement for an SGX driver on an FLC
> hardware platform to have some semblance of policy management to be
> relevant from a security/privacy perspective. It would have certainly
> been collegial to include a reference to our discussions and concerns
> in the changelog.
>
> See 364f68f5a3c in Jarkko's next/master.
>
> The changeset addresses enclave access to the PROVISION key but is
> still insufficient to deliver guarantees that are consistent with the
> SGX security model. In order to achieve that, policy management needs
> to embrace the use of MRSIGNER values, which is what our SFLC patchset
> uses.
>
> The noted changeset actually implements most of the 'kernel bloat'
> that our SFLC patchset needs to bolt onto.
>
> As of yesterday afternoon next/master still won't initialize a
> non-trivial enclave. Since there now appears to be a wholesale change
> in the driver architecture and UAPI we are sitting on the sidelines
> waiting for an indication all of that has some hope of working before
> we introduce our approach.
>
> Part of SFLC won't be popular but it is driven by clients who are
> actually paying for SGX security engineering and architectures.
How many of these people are actually posting here?
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-20 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 21:57 [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] x86: Add vDSO exception fixup for SGX Sean Christopherson
2018-12-14 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/5] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Sean Christopherson
2018-12-14 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/5] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Sean Christopherson
2018-12-14 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/5] x86/fault: Attempt to fixup unhandled #PF on ENCLU before signaling Sean Christopherson
2018-12-14 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/5] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO " Sean Christopherson
2018-12-14 21:57 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/5] x86/vdso: Add __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to wrap SGX enclave transitions Sean Christopherson
2018-12-19 9:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-18 4:18 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] x86: Add vDSO exception fixup for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-18 15:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-12-19 4:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 5:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 7:58 ` x86/sgx: uapi change proposal Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 8:41 ` Jethro Beekman
2018-12-19 9:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 9:36 ` Jethro Beekman
2018-12-19 10:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 14:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-12-20 2:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-20 10:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-20 13:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-20 13:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-22 8:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20181222082502.GA13275@linux.intel.com>
2018-12-23 12:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-23 20:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-24 11:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-02 20:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-03 15:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20190103162634.GA8610@linux.intel.com>
2019-01-09 14:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-21 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-12-21 17:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-21 18:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-12-21 23:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-23 20:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-24 12:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-21 23:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-22 6:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-08 19:27 ` Huang, Kai
2019-01-08 22:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-08 22:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-09 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 21:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-10 22:22 ` Huang, Kai
2019-01-10 23:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-11 0:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 1:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-11 12:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-11 13:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-11 23:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-18 14:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 17:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 16:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-09 5:24 ` Huang, Kai
2019-01-09 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 0:21 ` Huang, Kai
2019-01-10 0:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 17:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-20 10:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-19 14:43 ` Dr. Greg
2018-12-20 10:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-12-20 22:06 ` Dr. Greg
2018-12-21 13:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-12-20 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-20 12:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181220103400.GC26410@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=greg@enjellic.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.