All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: keystone: Modify legacy_irq_handler to check the IRQ_STATUS of INTA/B/C/D
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:15:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207161502.GC21111@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207110924.30716-3-kishon@ti.com>

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:39:17PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The legacy interrupt handler directly checks the IRQ_STATUS register
> corresponding to a interrupt line inorder to invoke generic_handle_irq.
> 
> While this is okay for K2G platform which has separate interrupt line for
> each of the 4 legacy interrupts, AM654 which uses the same PCIe wrapper
> has a single interrupt line for all the legacy interrupts. So for AM654
> the interrupt handler won't be able to directly check the IRQ_STATUS
> register corresponding to the interrupt line.
> 
> Also the legacy interrupt handler uses 'virq' obtained from
> irq_of_parse_and_map to find the correct interrupt line which raised the
> interrupt. There is no guarantee that virq assigned for contiguous hardware
> irq will be contiguous and the interrupt handler might end up checking
> the wrong IRQ_STATUS register.
> 
> In order to overcome the above issues, read the IRQ_STATUS register of
> all the 4 legacy interrupts to determine which interrupt was raised.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb081d21-7c03-0357-4294-7e92d95d838c@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> index 5286a480f76b..4cf9849d5a1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -214,16 +214,11 @@ static void ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = ks_pcie->pci;
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -	u32 pending;
>  	int virq;
>  
> -	pending = ks_pcie_app_readl(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(offset));
> -
> -	if (BIT(0) & pending) {
> -		virq = irq_linear_revmap(ks_pcie->legacy_irq_domain, offset);
> -		dev_dbg(dev, ": irq: irq_offset %d, virq %d\n", offset, virq);
> -		generic_handle_irq(virq);
> -	}
> +	virq = irq_linear_revmap(ks_pcie->legacy_irq_domain, offset);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, ": irq: irq_offset %d, virq %d\n", offset, virq);
> +	generic_handle_irq(virq);
>  
>  	/* EOI the INTx interrupt */
>  	ks_pcie_app_writel(ks_pcie, IRQ_EOI, offset);
> @@ -607,8 +602,9 @@ static void ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = ks_pcie->pci;
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -	u32 irq_offset = irq - ks_pcie->legacy_host_irqs[0];
>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	unsigned int irq_no;
> +	u32 reg;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, ": Handling legacy irq %d\n", irq);
>  
> @@ -618,7 +614,13 @@ static void ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	 * ack operation.
>  	 */
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> -	ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(ks_pcie, irq_offset);
> +	for (irq_no = 0; irq_no < PCI_NUM_INTX; irq_no++) {

I understand the aim of this code but now on platforms where there
is a 1:1 relationship between Linux IRQ and INTX this loop has
steps carried out for nothing.

If I understand the code correctly what this code does is force
looping over INTX status regs regardless of what linux IRQ number was
actually active.

You could do something faster by creating a matrix LinuxIRQ x INTx to
detect what INTx status register should actually be checked.

This seems overkill to me but it is not that complicated to implement
and may clarify the code (and avoid reading up to three registers for
nothing on the IRQ code path, which can make things faster too).

Lorenzo

> +		reg = ks_pcie_app_readl(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(irq_no));
> +		if (!(reg & INTx_EN))
> +			continue;
> +		ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(ks_pcie, irq_no);
> +	}
> +
>  	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: keystone: Modify legacy_irq_handler to check the IRQ_STATUS of INTA/B/C/D
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:15:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207161502.GC21111@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207110924.30716-3-kishon@ti.com>

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:39:17PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The legacy interrupt handler directly checks the IRQ_STATUS register
> corresponding to a interrupt line inorder to invoke generic_handle_irq.
> 
> While this is okay for K2G platform which has separate interrupt line for
> each of the 4 legacy interrupts, AM654 which uses the same PCIe wrapper
> has a single interrupt line for all the legacy interrupts. So for AM654
> the interrupt handler won't be able to directly check the IRQ_STATUS
> register corresponding to the interrupt line.
> 
> Also the legacy interrupt handler uses 'virq' obtained from
> irq_of_parse_and_map to find the correct interrupt line which raised the
> interrupt. There is no guarantee that virq assigned for contiguous hardware
> irq will be contiguous and the interrupt handler might end up checking
> the wrong IRQ_STATUS register.
> 
> In order to overcome the above issues, read the IRQ_STATUS register of
> all the 4 legacy interrupts to determine which interrupt was raised.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb081d21-7c03-0357-4294-7e92d95d838c@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> index 5286a480f76b..4cf9849d5a1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -214,16 +214,11 @@ static void ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = ks_pcie->pci;
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -	u32 pending;
>  	int virq;
>  
> -	pending = ks_pcie_app_readl(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(offset));
> -
> -	if (BIT(0) & pending) {
> -		virq = irq_linear_revmap(ks_pcie->legacy_irq_domain, offset);
> -		dev_dbg(dev, ": irq: irq_offset %d, virq %d\n", offset, virq);
> -		generic_handle_irq(virq);
> -	}
> +	virq = irq_linear_revmap(ks_pcie->legacy_irq_domain, offset);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, ": irq: irq_offset %d, virq %d\n", offset, virq);
> +	generic_handle_irq(virq);
>  
>  	/* EOI the INTx interrupt */
>  	ks_pcie_app_writel(ks_pcie, IRQ_EOI, offset);
> @@ -607,8 +602,9 @@ static void ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = ks_pcie->pci;
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -	u32 irq_offset = irq - ks_pcie->legacy_host_irqs[0];
>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	unsigned int irq_no;
> +	u32 reg;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, ": Handling legacy irq %d\n", irq);
>  
> @@ -618,7 +614,13 @@ static void ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	 * ack operation.
>  	 */
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> -	ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(ks_pcie, irq_offset);
> +	for (irq_no = 0; irq_no < PCI_NUM_INTX; irq_no++) {

I understand the aim of this code but now on platforms where there
is a 1:1 relationship between Linux IRQ and INTX this loop has
steps carried out for nothing.

If I understand the code correctly what this code does is force
looping over INTX status regs regardless of what linux IRQ number was
actually active.

You could do something faster by creating a matrix LinuxIRQ x INTx to
detect what INTx status register should actually be checked.

This seems overkill to me but it is not that complicated to implement
and may clarify the code (and avoid reading up to three registers for
nothing on the IRQ code path, which can make things faster too).

Lorenzo

> +		reg = ks_pcie_app_readl(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(irq_no));
> +		if (!(reg & INTx_EN))
> +			continue;
> +		ks_pcie_handle_legacy_irq(ks_pcie, irq_no);
> +	}
> +
>  	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-07 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-07 11:09 [PATCH v2 0/9] PCI: DWC/Keystone: MSI configuration cleanup Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PCI: keystone: Cleanup interrupt related macros Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: keystone: Modify legacy_irq_handler to check the IRQ_STATUS of INTA/B/C/D Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 16:15   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-02-07 16:15     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:32     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08  4:32       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 20:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 20:52     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-08 11:09     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08 11:09       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] PCI: keystone: Add separate functions for configuring MSI and legacy interrupt Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 15:44   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-07 15:44     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:33     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08  4:33       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] PCI: keystone: Use hwirq to get the IRQ number offset Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] PCI: keystone: Cleanup ks_pcie_msi_irq_handler and ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] PCI: dwc: Add support to use non default msi_irq_chip Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 16:48   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-07 16:48     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:46     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08  4:46       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08 10:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08 10:22         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-07 20:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 20:56     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI: keystone: Use Keystone specific msi_irq_chip Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: dwc: Remove Keystone specific dw_pcie_host_ops Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 18:45   ` Trent Piepho
2019-02-07 18:45     ` Trent Piepho
2019-02-07 21:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 21:26     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-08  5:13     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08  5:13       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08 14:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-08 14:05         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] PCI: dwc: Do not write to MSI control registers if the platform doesn't use it Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190207161502.GC21111@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.