All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:30:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403083019.29f5fd9b@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403024842.drobymuwvx6hmwv7@blommer>

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:48:43 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> We currently have:
> 
> ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, addr)
> ftrace_make_call(rec, addr)
> ftrace_modify_call(rec, old_addr, new_addr)
> 
> ... whereas we could have:
> 
> ftrace_call_init(mod, rec)
> ftrace_call_enable(rec, addr)
> ftrace_call_disable(rec, addr)
> ftrace_call_modify(rec, old_addr, new_addr)
> 
> ... so we wouldn't need to special-case anything for initialization (and
> don't need MCOUNT_ADDR at all), and it would be clearer as to what was
> happening at each stage.

Just a note. I would be OK if someone wants to work in changing the
ftrace interface to be this. I'll review the code, but I don't have the
cycles to implement such a change.

-- Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:30:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403083019.29f5fd9b@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403024842.drobymuwvx6hmwv7@blommer>

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:48:43 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> We currently have:
> 
> ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, addr)
> ftrace_make_call(rec, addr)
> ftrace_modify_call(rec, old_addr, new_addr)
> 
> ... whereas we could have:
> 
> ftrace_call_init(mod, rec)
> ftrace_call_enable(rec, addr)
> ftrace_call_disable(rec, addr)
> ftrace_call_modify(rec, old_addr, new_addr)
> 
> ... so we wouldn't need to special-case anything for initialization (and
> don't need MCOUNT_ADDR at all), and it would be clearer as to what was
> happening at each stage.

Just a note. I would be OK if someone wants to work in changing the
ftrace interface to be this. I'll review the code, but I don't have the
cycles to implement such a change.

-- Steve

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18 16:37 [PATCH v7 0/3] arm64: ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:37 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in Makefiles Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39   ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 17:24   ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-18 17:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39   ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22  1:39   ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-22  1:39     ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-22 13:09     ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22 13:09       ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-23 20:38       ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-23 20:38         ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-22 10:18   ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 10:18     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 13:28     ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22 13:28       ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22 13:49       ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 13:49         ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 13:55       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-22 13:55         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-04 12:03         ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-04 12:03           ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-04 13:43           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-04 13:43             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-06  8:59   ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06  8:59     ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06  9:30     ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06  9:30       ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06 14:09     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-06 14:09       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-06 15:05     ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-06 15:05       ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-07 10:33       ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 10:33         ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 12:51         ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-07 12:51           ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-07 13:47           ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 13:47             ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 14:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-07 14:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-07 14:58           ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 14:58             ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 15:00           ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-07 15:00             ` Torsten Duwe
2019-04-03  2:48   ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-03  2:48     ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-03 12:30     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-04-03 12:30       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-03 13:05     ` Torsten Duwe
2019-04-03 13:05       ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: use -fpatchable-function-entry if available Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39   ` Torsten Duwe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190403083019.29f5fd9b@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.