All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/23] iommu/dma: Squash __iommu_dma_{map,unmap}_page helpers
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:00:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523070028.7435-8-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523070028.7435-1-hch@lst.de>

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

The remaining internal callsites don't care about having prototypes
compatible with the relevant dma_map_ops callbacks, so the extra
level of indirection just wastes space and complictaes things.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index c04450a4adec..4596e4860da8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -717,18 +717,6 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
 		arch_sync_dma_for_device(dev, sg_phys(sg), sg->length, dir);
 }
 
-static dma_addr_t __iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
-		unsigned long offset, size_t size, int prot)
-{
-	return __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page) + offset, size, prot);
-}
-
-static void __iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
-		size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
-{
-	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
-}
-
 static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 		unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
 		unsigned long attrs)
@@ -974,7 +962,8 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!addr)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize,
+					  ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			if (coherent)
 				__free_pages(page, get_order(size));
@@ -991,7 +980,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!page)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize, ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1005,7 +994,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 				arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, iosize);
 			memset(addr, 0, size);
 		} else {
-			__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, *handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+			__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, *handle, iosize);
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		}
@@ -1044,12 +1033,12 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 	 * Hence how dodgy the below logic looks...
 	 */
 	if (dma_in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size);
 	} else if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS) {
 		struct page *page = vmalloc_to_page(cpu_addr);
 
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)){
@@ -1060,7 +1049,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 		__iommu_dma_free(dev, area->pages, iosize, &handle);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		__free_pages(virt_to_page(cpu_addr), get_order(size));
 	}
 }
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/23] iommu/dma: Squash __iommu_dma_{map,unmap}_page helpers
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:00:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523070028.7435-8-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523070028.7435-1-hch@lst.de>

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

The remaining internal callsites don't care about having prototypes
compatible with the relevant dma_map_ops callbacks, so the extra
level of indirection just wastes space and complictaes things.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index c04450a4adec..4596e4860da8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -717,18 +717,6 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
 		arch_sync_dma_for_device(dev, sg_phys(sg), sg->length, dir);
 }
 
-static dma_addr_t __iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
-		unsigned long offset, size_t size, int prot)
-{
-	return __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page) + offset, size, prot);
-}
-
-static void __iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
-		size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
-{
-	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
-}
-
 static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 		unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
 		unsigned long attrs)
@@ -974,7 +962,8 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!addr)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize,
+					  ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			if (coherent)
 				__free_pages(page, get_order(size));
@@ -991,7 +980,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!page)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize, ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1005,7 +994,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 				arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, iosize);
 			memset(addr, 0, size);
 		} else {
-			__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, *handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+			__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, *handle, iosize);
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		}
@@ -1044,12 +1033,12 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 	 * Hence how dodgy the below logic looks...
 	 */
 	if (dma_in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size);
 	} else if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS) {
 		struct page *page = vmalloc_to_page(cpu_addr);
 
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)){
@@ -1060,7 +1049,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 		__iommu_dma_free(dev, area->pages, iosize, &handle);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		__free_pages(virt_to_page(cpu_addr), get_order(size));
 	}
 }
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/23] iommu/dma: Squash __iommu_dma_{map,unmap}_page helpers
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:00:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523070028.7435-8-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523070028.7435-1-hch@lst.de>

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

The remaining internal callsites don't care about having prototypes
compatible with the relevant dma_map_ops callbacks, so the extra
level of indirection just wastes space and complictaes things.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index c04450a4adec..4596e4860da8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -717,18 +717,6 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
 		arch_sync_dma_for_device(dev, sg_phys(sg), sg->length, dir);
 }
 
-static dma_addr_t __iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
-		unsigned long offset, size_t size, int prot)
-{
-	return __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page) + offset, size, prot);
-}
-
-static void __iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
-		size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
-{
-	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, size);
-}
-
 static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 		unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
 		unsigned long attrs)
@@ -974,7 +962,8 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!addr)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize,
+					  ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			if (coherent)
 				__free_pages(page, get_order(size));
@@ -991,7 +980,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 		if (!page)
 			return NULL;
 
-		*handle = __iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, iosize, ioprot);
+		*handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize, ioprot);
 		if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1005,7 +994,7 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 				arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, iosize);
 			memset(addr, 0, size);
 		} else {
-			__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, *handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+			__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, *handle, iosize);
 			dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page,
 						    size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		}
@@ -1044,12 +1033,12 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 	 * Hence how dodgy the below logic looks...
 	 */
 	if (dma_in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size);
 	} else if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS) {
 		struct page *page = vmalloc_to_page(cpu_addr);
 
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, attrs);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)){
@@ -1060,7 +1049,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 		__iommu_dma_free(dev, area->pages, iosize, &handle);
 		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
 	} else {
-		__iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
+		__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, handle, iosize);
 		__free_pages(virt_to_page(cpu_addr), get_order(size));
 	}
 }
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23  7:00 implement generic dma_map_ops for IOMMUs v6 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 01/23] iommu/dma: Cleanup dma-iommu.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 02/23] iommu/dma: Remove the flush_page callback Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 03/23] iommu/dma: Use for_each_sg in iommu_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 04/23] iommu/dma: move the arm64 wrappers to common code Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 05/23] iommu/dma: Move __iommu_dma_map Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 06/23] iommu/dma: Move domain lookup into __iommu_dma_{map,unmap} Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` [PATCH 06/23] iommu/dma: Move domain lookup into __iommu_dma_{map, unmap} Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-05-23  7:00   ` [PATCH 07/23] iommu/dma: Squash __iommu_dma_{map,unmap}_page helpers Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 08/23] iommu/dma: Factor out remapped pages lookup Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 09/23] iommu/dma: Refactor the page array remapping allocator Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 10/23] iommu/dma: Remove __iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 11/23] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 12/23] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 13/23] iommu/dma: Don't remap CMA unnecessarily Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 14/23] iommu/dma: Merge the CMA and alloc_pages allocation paths Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 15/23] iommu/dma: Split iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 16/23] iommu/dma: Cleanup variable naming in iommu_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 17/23] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_alloc, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 18/23] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_get_sgtable Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 19/23] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_mmap Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 20/23] iommu/dma: Don't depend on CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 21/23] iommu/dma: Switch copyright boilerplace to SPDX Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 22/23] arm64: switch copyright boilerplace to SPDX in dma-mapping.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00 ` [PATCH 23/23] arm64: trim includes " Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 12:33 ` implement generic dma_map_ops for IOMMUs v6 Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 12:33   ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 12:33   ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190523070028.7435-8-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.