From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kerne
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611173903.4icrfmoyfvms35cy@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
> > > > +#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> > >
> > > I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> > > a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> > > kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> > > in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> > > the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> > > assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> > > inherit this.
> >
> > Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
> > think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
> > differences from the one I posted yesterday:
> >
> > - renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
> > to disable the relaxed ABI
> >
> > - sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
> > (just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
> >
> > And, of course, it needs more testing.
>
> Sure, I'll add it to the series.
>
> Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?
Not necessary, your patch just relaxes the ABI for all apps, mine
tightens it. You could instead move the untagging to __range_ok() and
rebase my patch accordingly.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, enh <enh@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611173903.4icrfmoyfvms35cy@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
> > > > +#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> > >
> > > I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> > > a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> > > kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> > > in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> > > the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> > > assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> > > inherit this.
> >
> > Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
> > think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
> > differences from the one I posted yesterday:
> >
> > - renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
> > to disable the relaxed ABI
> >
> > - sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
> > (just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
> >
> > And, of course, it needs more testing.
>
> Sure, I'll add it to the series.
>
> Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?
Not necessary, your patch just relaxes the ABI for all apps, mine
tightens it. You could instead move the untagging to __range_ok() and
rebase my patch accordingly.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, enh <enh@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611173903.4icrfmoyfvms35cy@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
> > > > +#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> > >
> > > I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> > > a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> > > kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> > > in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> > > the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> > > assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> > > inherit this.
> >
> > Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
> > think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
> > differences from the one I posted yesterday:
> >
> > - renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
> > to disable the relaxed ABI
> >
> > - sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
> > (just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
> >
> > And, of course, it needs more testing.
>
> Sure, I'll add it to the series.
>
> Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?
Not necessary, your patch just relaxes the ABI for all apps, mine
tightens it. You could instead move the untagging to __range_ok() and
rebase my patch accordingly.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, enh <enh@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611173903.4icrfmoyfvms35cy@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
> > > > +#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> > >
> > > I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> > > a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> > > kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> > > in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> > > the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> > > assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> > > inherit this.
> >
> > Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
> > think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
> > differences from the one I posted yesterday:
> >
> > - renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
> > to disable the relaxed ABI
> >
> > - sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
> > (just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
> >
> > And, of course, it needs more testing.
>
> Sure, I'll add it to the series.
>
> Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?
Not necessary, your patch just relaxes the ABI for all apps, mine
tightens it. You could instead move the untagging to __range_ok() and
rebase my patch accordingly.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 356+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 16:55 [PATCH v16 00/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:02 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:02 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:02 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:02 ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 17:02 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:06 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:24 ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 17:29 ` hch
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 18:17 ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 11:45 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 17:53 ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:07 ` keescook
2019-06-10 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:53 ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 20:36 ` keescook
2019-06-10 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12 11:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12 11:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-06-11 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 03/16] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:48 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:06 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-11 20:06 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-11 20:06 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 04/16] mm: untag user pointers in do_pages_move Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:49 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:18 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-11 20:18 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-11 20:18 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-12 11:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 05/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:28 ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 15:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 15:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 15:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 06/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:59 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 07/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:00 ` keescook
2019-06-08 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:29 ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 08/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:02 ` keescook
2019-06-08 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:38 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 14:38 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 14:38 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 14:38 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 09/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:03 ` keescook
2019-06-08 4:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 10/16] drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 11/16] drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-03 17:46 ` jgg
2019-06-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:18 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:27 ` jgg
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:45 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:02 ` jgg
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:09 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 13/16] media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:52 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 14/16] tee, arm64: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-07 5:33 ` jens.wiklander
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-08 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 4:05 ` keescook
2019-06-08 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 15/16] vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:58 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:58 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:58 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:58 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:58 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 16/16] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08 3:56 ` keescook
2019-06-08 3:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-11 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190611173903.4icrfmoyfvms35cy@mbp \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kerne \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.