From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:57:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712043341.GI17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > + if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
> > /* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
> > nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
> > nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
> > @@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (!mounted)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
> suprious hard errors?
I could switch to -ECHILD for the *_rcu() checks if you'd prefer that.
Though, I'd have (probably naively) thought that you'd have already
gotten -ECHILD from the seqlock checks if there was a race during ".."
handling.
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
> > + error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > + if (unlikely(error))
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + nd->root = nd->path;
> > + if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > + path_get(&nd->root);
> > + }
> > if (*s == '/') {
> > if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
> > set_root(nd);
> > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > return s;
> > }
> > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > - if (unlikely(error))
> > - return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
>
> Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
Yes. I did it to be more consistent with the other "have we got the
root" checks elsewhere. Is there another way you'd prefer I do it?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:57:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712043341.GI17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > + if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
> > /* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
> > nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
> > nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
> > @@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (!mounted)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
> suprious hard errors?
I could switch to -ECHILD for the *_rcu() checks if you'd prefer that.
Though, I'd have (probably naively) thought that you'd have already
gotten -ECHILD from the seqlock checks if there was a race during ".."
handling.
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
> > + error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > + if (unlikely(error))
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + nd->root = nd->path;
> > + if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > + path_get(&nd->root);
> > + }
> > if (*s == '/') {
> > if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
> > set_root(nd);
> > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > return s;
> > }
> > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > - if (unlikely(error))
> > - return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
>
> Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
Yes. I did it to be more consistent with the other "have we got the
root" checks elsewhere. Is there another way you'd prefer I do it?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:57:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712043341.GI17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > + if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
> > /* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
> > nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
> > nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
> > @@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (!mounted)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
> suprious hard errors?
I could switch to -ECHILD for the *_rcu() checks if you'd prefer that.
Though, I'd have (probably naively) thought that you'd have already
gotten -ECHILD from the seqlock checks if there was a race during ".."
handling.
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
> > + error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > + if (unlikely(error))
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + nd->root = nd->path;
> > + if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > + path_get(&nd->root);
> > + }
> > if (*s == '/') {
> > if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
> > set_root(nd);
> > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > return s;
> > }
> > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > - if (unlikely(error))
> > - return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
>
> Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
Yes. I did it to be more consistent with the other "have we got the
root" checks elsewhere. Is there another way you'd prefer I do it?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:57:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712043341.GI17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > + if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
> > /* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
> > nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
> > nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
> > @@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (!mounted)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
> suprious hard errors?
I could switch to -ECHILD for the *_rcu() checks if you'd prefer that.
Though, I'd have (probably naively) thought that you'd have already
gotten -ECHILD from the seqlock checks if there was a race during ".."
handling.
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
> > + error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > + if (unlikely(error))
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + nd->root = nd->path;
> > + if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > + path_get(&nd->root);
> > + }
> > if (*s == '/') {
> > if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
> > set_root(nd);
> > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > return s;
> > }
> > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > - if (unlikely(error))
> > - return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
>
> Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
Yes. I did it to be more consistent with the other "have we got the
root" checks elsewhere. Is there another way you'd prefer I do it?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:57:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712043341.GI17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2295 bytes --]
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > + if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
> > /* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
> > nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
> > nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
> > @@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return -ECHILD;
> > if (!mounted)
> > break;
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
> > + return -EXDEV;
>
> Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
> suprious hard errors?
I could switch to -ECHILD for the *_rcu() checks if you'd prefer that.
Though, I'd have (probably naively) thought that you'd have already
gotten -ECHILD from the seqlock checks if there was a race during ".."
handling.
> > + if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
> > + error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > + if (unlikely(error))
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + nd->root = nd->path;
> > + if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > + path_get(&nd->root);
> > + }
> > if (*s == '/') {
> > if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
> > set_root(nd);
> > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > return s;
> > }
> > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > - if (unlikely(error))
> > - return ERR_PTR(error);
> > + if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
>
> Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
Yes. I did it to be more consistent with the other "have we got the
root" checks elsewhere. Is there another way you'd prefer I do it?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 243+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-06 14:57 [PATCH v9 00/10] namei: openat2(2) path resolution restrictions Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] namei: obey trailing magic-link DAC permissions Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 4:14 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:14 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:14 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:14 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:14 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 6:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 6:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 6:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 6:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 6:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 13:10 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:10 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:10 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:10 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:10 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 7:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] procfs: switch magic-link modes to be more sane Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] open: O_EMPTYPATH: procfs-less file descriptor re-opening Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] namei: split out nd->dfd handling to dirfd_path_init Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 4:20 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:20 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:20 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:20 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:20 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 4:33 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 10:57 ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2019-07-12 10:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 10:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 10:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 10:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:39 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:55 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:55 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:55 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:55 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 12:55 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 13:25 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Al Viro
2019-07-13 2:41 ` Al Viro
2019-07-13 2:41 ` Al Viro
2019-07-13 2:41 ` Al Viro
2019-07-13 2:41 ` Al Viro
2019-07-13 2:41 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 3:58 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 3:58 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 3:58 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 3:58 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 3:58 ` Al Viro
2019-07-16 8:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-16 8:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-16 8:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-16 8:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-16 8:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:00 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:00 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:00 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:00 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 7:00 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 14:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 14:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 14:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 14:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-14 14:36 ` Al Viro
2019-07-18 3:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 3:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 3:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 3:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 3:17 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 10:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 10:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 10:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 10:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-14 10:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] namei: LOOKUP_IN_ROOT: chroot-like path resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] namei: aggressively check for nd->root escape on ".." resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] open: openat2(2) syscall Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 14:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-18 14:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-18 14:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-18 14:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-18 14:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-07-18 15:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 15:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 15:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 15:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 15:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 16:12 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-18 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-19 1:59 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 1:59 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 1:59 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 1:59 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 1:59 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-07-19 2:19 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-19 2:19 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-19 2:19 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-19 2:19 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-19 2:19 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] kselftest: save-and-restore errno to allow for %m formatting Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] selftests: add openat2(2) selftests Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-06 14:57 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 1:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 5:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-08 5:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-08 5:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-08 5:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-08 5:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 15:11 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] namei: openat2(2) path resolution restrictions Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:11 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:11 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:11 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:11 ` Al Viro
2019-07-12 15:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 15:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 15:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 15:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-07-12 15:32 ` Aleksa Sarai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190712105745.nruaftgeat6irhzr@yavin \
--to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.