From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Hoan Tran OS <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Open Source Submission <patches@amperecomputing.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:37:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712121223.GR29483@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:12:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 12-07-19 10:56:47, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> [...]
> > It would be good if we can enable it by-default. Otherwise, let arch
> > enables it by them-self. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> I can hardly make any suggestions when it is not really clear _why_ you
> want to remove this config option in the first place. Please explain
> what motivated you to make this change.
Sorry, I think this confusion might actually be my fault and Hoan has just
been implementing my vague suggestion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190625101245.s4vxfosoop52gl4e@willie-the-truck/
If the preference of the mm folks is to leave CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
as it is, then we can define it for arm64. I just find it a bit weird that
the majority of NUMA-capable architectures have to add a symbol in the arch
Kconfig file, for what appears to be a performance optimisation applicable
only to ia64, mips and sh.
At the very least we could make the thing selectable.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
willy@infradead.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Hoan Tran OS <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Open Source Submission <patches@amperecomputing.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:37:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712121223.GR29483@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:12:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 12-07-19 10:56:47, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> [...]
> > It would be good if we can enable it by-default. Otherwise, let arch
> > enables it by them-self. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> I can hardly make any suggestions when it is not really clear _why_ you
> want to remove this config option in the first place. Please explain
> what motivated you to make this change.
Sorry, I think this confusion might actually be my fault and Hoan has just
been implementing my vague suggestion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190625101245.s4vxfosoop52gl4e@willie-the-truck/
If the preference of the mm folks is to leave CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
as it is, then we can define it for arm64. I just find it a bit weird that
the majority of NUMA-capable architectures have to add a symbol in the arch
Kconfig file, for what appears to be a performance optimisation applicable
only to ia64, mips and sh.
At the very least we could make the thing selectable.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
willy@infradead.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Hoan Tran OS <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Open Source Submission <patches@amperecomputing.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:37:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712121223.GR29483@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:12:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 12-07-19 10:56:47, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> [...]
> > It would be good if we can enable it by-default. Otherwise, let arch
> > enables it by them-self. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> I can hardly make any suggestions when it is not really clear _why_ you
> want to remove this config option in the first place. Please explain
> what motivated you to make this change.
Sorry, I think this confusion might actually be my fault and Hoan has just
been implementing my vague suggestion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190625101245.s4vxfosoop52gl4e@willie-the-truck/
If the preference of the mm folks is to leave CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
as it is, then we can define it for arm64. I just find it a bit weird that
the majority of NUMA-capable architectures have to add a symbol in the arch
Kconfig file, for what appears to be a performance optimisation applicable
only to ia64, mips and sh.
At the very least we could make the thing selectable.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
willy@infradead.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Hoan Tran OS <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Open Source Submission <patches@amperecomputing.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:37:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712121223.GR29483@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:12:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 12-07-19 10:56:47, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> [...]
> > It would be good if we can enable it by-default. Otherwise, let arch
> > enables it by them-self. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> I can hardly make any suggestions when it is not really clear _why_ you
> want to remove this config option in the first place. Please explain
> what motivated you to make this change.
Sorry, I think this confusion might actually be my fault and Hoan has just
been implementing my vague suggestion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190625101245.s4vxfosoop52gl4e@willie-the-truck/
If the preference of the mm folks is to leave CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
as it is, then we can define it for arm64. I just find it a bit weird that
the majority of NUMA-capable architectures have to add a symbol in the arch
Kconfig file, for what appears to be a performance optimisation applicable
only to ia64, mips and sh.
At the very least we could make the thing selectable.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 140+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-11 23:25 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86: " Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-06 16:47 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-08-06 16:47 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-08-06 16:47 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-08-06 16:47 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-08-06 16:47 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sparc: " Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] s390: " Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-11 23:25 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-12 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-12 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-12 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-12 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-12 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 10:56 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 10:56 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 10:56 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 10:56 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 10:56 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 14:37 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-07-12 14:37 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-12 14:37 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-12 14:37 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-12 14:37 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-12 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 17:55 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-15 17:55 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-15 17:55 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-15 17:55 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-15 17:55 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-30 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 17:31 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-30 17:31 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-30 17:31 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-30 17:31 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-30 17:31 ` Hoan Tran OS
2019-07-31 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 12:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 12:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 12:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 12:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 12:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 13:00 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 13:00 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OT Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 13:00 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 14:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 14:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 14:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 14:21 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 14:21 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 14:41 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 14:41 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 17:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 17:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 17:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 17:15 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 17:15 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Mike Rapoport
2019-07-31 17:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-07-31 17:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-07-31 17:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-07-31 17:45 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Randy Dunlap
2019-07-31 17:45 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Randy Dunlap
2019-09-02 13:51 ` Michal Simek
2019-09-02 13:51 ` Michal Simek
2019-09-02 13:51 ` Michal Simek
2019-09-02 13:51 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Michal Simek
2019-09-02 13:51 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Michal Simek
2019-09-02 15:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-02 15:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-02 15:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-02 15:18 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPA Mike Rapoport
2019-09-02 15:18 ` microblaze HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP dependency (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA) Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hoan@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.