From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
enh <enh@google.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:13:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806171335.4dzjex5asoertaob@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724142059.GC21234@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:02 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:03:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > Should this go through the mm or the arm tree?
> > >
> > > I would certainly prefer to take at least the arm64 bits via the arm64 tree
> > > (i.e. patches 1, 2 and 15). We also need a Documentation patch describing
> > > the new ABI.
> >
> > Sounds good! Should I post those patches together with the
> > Documentation patches from Vincenzo as a separate patchset?
>
> Yes, please (although as you say below, we need a new version of those
> patches from Vincenzo to address the feedback on v5). The other thing I
> should say is that I'd be happy to queue the other patches in the series
> too, but some of them are missing acks from the relevant maintainers (e.g.
> the mm/ and fs/ changes).
Ok, I've queued patches 1, 2, and 15 on a stable branch here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/tbi
which should find its way into -next shortly via our for-next/core branch.
If you want to make changes, please send additional patches on top.
This is targetting 5.4, but I will drop it before the merge window if
we don't have both of the following in place:
* Updated ABI documentation with Acks from Catalin and Kevin
* The other patches in the series either Acked (so I can pick them up)
or queued via some other tree(s) for 5.4.
Make sense?
Cheers,
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, enh <enh@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:13:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806171335.4dzjex5asoertaob@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724142059.GC21234@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:02 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:03:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > Should this go through the mm or the arm tree?
> > >
> > > I would certainly prefer to take at least the arm64 bits via the arm64 tree
> > > (i.e. patches 1, 2 and 15). We also need a Documentation patch describing
> > > the new ABI.
> >
> > Sounds good! Should I post those patches together with the
> > Documentation patches from Vincenzo as a separate patchset?
>
> Yes, please (although as you say below, we need a new version of those
> patches from Vincenzo to address the feedback on v5). The other thing I
> should say is that I'd be happy to queue the other patches in the series
> too, but some of them are missing acks from the relevant maintainers (e.g.
> the mm/ and fs/ changes).
Ok, I've queued patches 1, 2, and 15 on a stable branch here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/tbi
which should find its way into -next shortly via our for-next/core branch.
If you want to make changes, please send additional patches on top.
This is targetting 5.4, but I will drop it before the merge window if
we don't have both of the following in place:
* Updated ABI documentation with Acks from Catalin and Kevin
* The other patches in the series either Acked (so I can pick them up)
or queued via some other tree(s) for 5.4.
Make sense?
Cheers,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Dave
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:13:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806171335.4dzjex5asoertaob@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724142059.GC21234@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:02 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:03:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > > Should this go through the mm or the arm tree?
> > >
> > > I would certainly prefer to take at least the arm64 bits via the arm64 tree
> > > (i.e. patches 1, 2 and 15). We also need a Documentation patch describing
> > > the new ABI.
> >
> > Sounds good! Should I post those patches together with the
> > Documentation patches from Vincenzo as a separate patchset?
>
> Yes, please (although as you say below, we need a new version of those
> patches from Vincenzo to address the feedback on v5). The other thing I
> should say is that I'd be happy to queue the other patches in the series
> too, but some of them are missing acks from the relevant maintainers (e.g.
> the mm/ and fs/ changes).
Ok, I've queued patches 1, 2, and 15 on a stable branch here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/tbi
which should find its way into -next shortly via our for-next/core branch.
If you want to make changes, please send additional patches on top.
This is targetting 5.4, but I will drop it before the merge window if
we don't have both of the following in place:
* Updated ABI documentation with Acks from Catalin and Kevin
* The other patches in the series either Acked (so I can pick them up)
or queued via some other tree(s) for 5.4.
Make sense?
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 175+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 17:58 [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 01/15] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 02/15] arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-31 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-31 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-31 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 12:38 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 12:38 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 12:38 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 16:45 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 16:45 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 16:45 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-02 10:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 03/15] lib: untag user pointers in strn*_user Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 04/15] mm: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-09 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 05/15] mm: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 06/15] mm: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 07/15] fs/namespace: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 08/15] userfaultfd: untag user pointers Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 09/15] drm/amdgpu: " Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 10/15] drm/radeon: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 11/15] IB/mlx4: untag user pointers in mlx4_get_umem_mr Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 19:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 19:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-24 19:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-25 11:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-25 11:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-25 11:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-25 11:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 12/15] media/v4l2-core: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 13/15] tee/shm: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 14/15] vfio/type1: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` [PATCH v19 15/15] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 18:03 ` [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 18:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 18:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-23 18:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 14:02 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:02 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:02 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:02 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 14:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 14:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 14:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-07-24 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 17:12 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-24 17:12 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-24 17:12 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-24 17:12 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-08-06 17:13 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-08-06 17:13 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-06 17:13 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-06 17:13 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-07 17:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-07 17:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-07 17:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-07 17:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-08 21:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 21:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 21:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 21:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-08 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-08 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-08 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-08 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-08 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-08-09 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-09 9:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 9:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 9:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 9:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] arm64 relaxed ABI Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-25 13:50 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] arm64: Define Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-25 13:50 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-30 10:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-30 10:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-30 13:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-30 13:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-30 13:57 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-30 13:57 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-30 14:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-30 14:24 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-30 14:48 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-30 14:48 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-07-31 16:43 ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-31 16:43 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-02 10:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: Relax Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.rst Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-25 13:50 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-07-31 16:50 ` [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Dave Hansen
2019-07-31 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2019-07-31 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 12:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 12:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 12:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-08-01 12:48 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-01 12:48 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-01 12:48 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-01 12:48 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-01 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-01 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-02 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-02 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190806171335.4dzjex5asoertaob@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
--cc=Lee.Smith@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.