From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: Use dma_fence_array for implementing shared dma_resv fences Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:57:22 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190826145731.1725-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> (raw) This is the new dma_fence_array based container for shared fences in the dma_resv object. Advantage of this approach is that you can grab a reference to the current set of shared fences at any time, which allows us to drop the sequence number increment and makes the whole RCU handling much more easier. Disadvantage is that RCU users now have to grab a reference instead of using the sequence counter. As far as I can see i915 was actually the only driver doing this. So we optimize for adding more fences instead of reading them now. Another behavior change worth noting is that the shared fences are now only visible after unlocking the dma_resv object or calling dma_resv_fences_commit() manually. Please review and/or comment, Christian.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: Use dma_fence_array for implementing shared dma_resv fences Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:57:22 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190826145731.1725-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> (raw) This is the new dma_fence_array based container for shared fences in the dma_resv object. Advantage of this approach is that you can grab a reference to the current set of shared fences at any time, which allows us to drop the sequence number increment and makes the whole RCU handling much more easier. Disadvantage is that RCU users now have to grab a reference instead of using the sequence counter. As far as I can see i915 was actually the only driver doing this. So we optimize for adding more fences instead of reading them now. Another behavior change worth noting is that the shared fences are now only visible after unlocking the dma_resv object or calling dma_resv_fences_commit() manually. Please review and/or comment, Christian. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 14:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-08-26 14:57 Christian König [this message] 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Use dma_fence_array for implementing shared dma_resv fences Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] dma-buf: fix dma_fence_array_signaled Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-27 11:44 ` Chris Wilson 2019-08-27 11:44 ` Chris Wilson 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] dma-buf: make to_dma_fence_array NULL safe Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-30 16:07 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2019-08-30 16:07 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_array_alloc/free Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_array_recycle v2 Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_array_for_each Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] dma-buf/resv: add dma_resv_prune_fences v2 Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] dma-buf/resv: add new fences container implementation Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] dma-buf/resv: use new dma_fence_array based implementation Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] dma-buf/resv: drop the sequence count Christian König 2019-08-26 14:57 ` Christian König 2019-08-27 16:37 ` Use dma_fence_array for implementing shared dma_resv fences Daniel Vetter 2019-08-27 16:37 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190826145731.1725-1-christian.koenig@amd.com \ --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \ --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.