[PATCH 4/5] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:14:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190826201425.17547-5-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190826201425.17547-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We need to make sure implementations don't cheat and don't have a
possible schedule/blocking point deeply burried where review can't
catch it.

I'm not sure whether this is the best way to make sure all the
might_sleep() callsites trigger, and it's a bit ugly in the code flow.
But it gets the job done.

Inspired by an i915 patch series which did exactly that, because the
rules haven't been entirely clear to us.

v2: Use the shiny new non_block_start/end annotations instead of
abusing preempt_disable/enable.

v3: Rebase on top of Glisse's arg rework.

v4: Rebase on top of more Glisse rework.

v5: Also annotate invalidate_range_end in the same style. I hope I got
Jason's request for this right.

Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> (v4)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 0523555933c9..b17f3fd3779b 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -181,7 +181,13 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 	id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, &range->mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_start) {
-			int _ret = mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, range);
+			int _ret;
+
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_start();
+			_ret = mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, range);
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_end();
 			if (_ret) {
 				pr_info("%pS callback failed with %d in %sblockable context.\n",
 					mn->ops->invalidate_range_start, _ret,
@@ -224,8 +230,13 @@ void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
 			mn->ops->invalidate_range(mn, range->mm,
 						  range->start,
 						  range->end);
-		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_end)
+		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_end) {
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_start();
 			mn->ops->invalidate_range_end(mn, range);
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_end();
+		}
 	}
 	srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
 	lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map);
-- 
2.23.0

