All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:19:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904094956.GT2672@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190823125618.8133-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

On 23-08-19, 15:56, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When other cores want to use EDMA for their use cases Linux was not playing
> nicely.
> By design EDMA is supporting shared use with shadow regions. Linux is using
> region0, others can be used by other cores.
> 
> In order to not break multicore shared usage of EDMA:
> - do not reset paRAM slots which is not allocated for Linux (reserved paRAM
>   slots)
> - Only reset region0 access registers, do not touch other regions
> - Add option for reserved channels which should not be used by Linux in a similar
>   fashion as we already have for reserved paRAM slots.

Applied 1 to 3, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:19:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904094956.GT2672@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190823125618.8133-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

On 23-08-19, 15:56, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When other cores want to use EDMA for their use cases Linux was not playing
> nicely.
> By design EDMA is supporting shared use with shadow regions. Linux is using
> region0, others can be used by other cores.
> 
> In order to not break multicore shared usage of EDMA:
> - do not reset paRAM slots which is not allocated for Linux (reserved paRAM
>   slots)
> - Only reset region0 access registers, do not touch other regions
> - Add option for reserved channels which should not be used by Linux in a similar
>   fashion as we already have for reserved paRAM slots.

Applied 1 to 3, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-23 12:56 [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Do not reset reserved paRAM slots Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Only reset region0 access registers Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Use bitmap_set() instead of open coded edma_set_bits() Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: dma: ti-edma: Add option for reserved channel ranges Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Rob Herring
2019-08-29 22:47     ` Rob Herring
2019-08-30  5:37     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-30  5:37       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-30  5:37       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-03 10:19       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-03 10:19         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-03 10:19         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-06 13:10         ` Rob Herring
2019-09-06 13:10           ` Rob Herring
2019-09-06 13:10           ` Rob Herring
2019-08-23 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Add support for handling reserved channels Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-08-23 12:56   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-09-04  9:49 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2019-09-04  9:49   ` [PATCH 0/5] dmaengine: ti: edma: Multicore usage related fixes Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190904094956.GT2672@vkoul-mobl \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.