From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
x86@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:22:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64504101-d9dd-f273-02f9-e9a8b178eecc@c-s.fr>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:26:03 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
[..]
> My suggestion was not to completely drop the #ifdef but to do like you
> did in pgd_clear_tests() for instance, ie to add the following test on
> top of the function:
>
> if (mm_pud_folded(mm) || is_defined(__ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK))
> return;
>
Ah, very nice, this would also fix the remaining issues for s390. Since
we have dynamic page table folding, neither __PAGETABLE_PXX_FOLDED nor
__ARCH_HAS_XLEVEL_HACK is defined, but mm_pxx_folded() will work.
mm_alloc() returns with a 3-level page table by default on s390, so we
will run into issues in p4d_clear/populate_tests(), and also at the end
with p4d/pud_free() (double free).
So, adding the mm_pud_folded() check to p4d_clear/populate_tests(),
and also adding mm_p4d/pud_folded() checks at the end before calling
p4d/pud_free(), would make it all work on s390.
BTW, regarding p4d/pud_free(), I'm not sure if we should rather check
the folding inside our s390 functions, similar to how we do it for
p4d/pud_free_tlb(), instead of relying on not being called for folded
p4d/pud. So far, I see no problem with this behavior, all callers of
p4d/pud_free() should be fine because of our folding check within
p4d/pud_present/none(). But that doesn't mean that it is correct not
to check for the folding inside p4d/pud_free(). At least, with this
test module we do now have a caller of p4d/pud_free() on potentially
folded entries, so instead of adding pxx_folded() checks to this
test module, we could add them to our p4d/pud_free() functions.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Gerald
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64504101-d9dd-f273-02f9-e9a8b178eecc@c-s.fr>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:26:03 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
[..]
> My suggestion was not to completely drop the #ifdef but to do like you
> did in pgd_clear_tests() for instance, ie to add the following test on
> top of the function:
>
> if (mm_pud_folded(mm) || is_defined(__ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK))
> return;
>
Ah, very nice, this would also fix the remaining issues for s390. Since
we have dynamic page table folding, neither __PAGETABLE_PXX_FOLDED nor
__ARCH_HAS_XLEVEL_HACK is defined, but mm_pxx_folded() will work.
mm_alloc() returns with a 3-level page table by default on s390, so we
will run into issues in p4d_clear/populate_tests(), and also at the end
with p4d/pud_free() (double free).
So, adding the mm_pud_folded() check to p4d_clear/populate_tests(),
and also adding mm_p4d/pud_folded() checks at the end before calling
p4d/pud_free(), would make it all work on s390.
BTW, regarding p4d/pud_free(), I'm not sure if we should rather check
the folding inside our s390 functions, similar to how we do it for
p4d/pud_free_tlb(), instead of relying on not being called for folded
p4d/pud. So far, I see no problem with this behavior, all callers of
p4d/pud_free() should be fine because of our folding check within
p4d/pud_present/none(). But that doesn't mean that it is correct not
to check for the folding inside p4d/pud_free(). At least, with this
test module we do now have a caller of p4d/pud_free() on potentially
folded entries, so instead of adding pxx_folded() checks to this
test module, we could add them to our p4d/pud_free() functions.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Gerald
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64504101-d9dd-f273-02f9-e9a8b178eecc@c-s.fr>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:26:03 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
[..]
> My suggestion was not to completely drop the #ifdef but to do like you
> did in pgd_clear_tests() for instance, ie to add the following test on
> top of the function:
>
> if (mm_pud_folded(mm) || is_defined(__ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK))
> return;
>
Ah, very nice, this would also fix the remaining issues for s390. Since
we have dynamic page table folding, neither __PAGETABLE_PXX_FOLDED nor
__ARCH_HAS_XLEVEL_HACK is defined, but mm_pxx_folded() will work.
mm_alloc() returns with a 3-level page table by default on s390, so we
will run into issues in p4d_clear/populate_tests(), and also at the end
with p4d/pud_free() (double free).
So, adding the mm_pud_folded() check to p4d_clear/populate_tests(),
and also adding mm_p4d/pud_folded() checks at the end before calling
p4d/pud_free(), would make it all work on s390.
BTW, regarding p4d/pud_free(), I'm not sure if we should rather check
the folding inside our s390 functions, similar to how we do it for
p4d/pud_free_tlb(), instead of relying on not being called for folded
p4d/pud. So far, I see no problem with this behavior, all callers of
p4d/pud_free() should be fine because of our folding check within
p4d/pud_present/none(). But that doesn't mean that it is correct not
to check for the folding inside p4d/pud_free(). At least, with this
test module we do now have a caller of p4d/pud_free() on potentially
folded entries, so instead of adding pxx_folded() checks to this
test module, we could add them to our p4d/pud_free() functions.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Gerald
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com (Gerald Schaefer)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64504101-d9dd-f273-02f9-e9a8b178eecc@c-s.fr>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:26:03 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
[..]
> My suggestion was not to completely drop the #ifdef but to do like you
> did in pgd_clear_tests() for instance, ie to add the following test on
> top of the function:
>
> if (mm_pud_folded(mm) || is_defined(__ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK))
> return;
>
Ah, very nice, this would also fix the remaining issues for s390. Since
we have dynamic page table folding, neither __PAGETABLE_PXX_FOLDED nor
__ARCH_HAS_XLEVEL_HACK is defined, but mm_pxx_folded() will work.
mm_alloc() returns with a 3-level page table by default on s390, so we
will run into issues in p4d_clear/populate_tests(), and also at the end
with p4d/pud_free() (double free).
So, adding the mm_pud_folded() check to p4d_clear/populate_tests(),
and also adding mm_p4d/pud_folded() checks at the end before calling
p4d/pud_free(), would make it all work on s390.
BTW, regarding p4d/pud_free(), I'm not sure if we should rather check
the folding inside our s390 functions, similar to how we do it for
p4d/pud_free_tlb(), instead of relying on not being called for folded
p4d/pud. So far, I see no problem with this behavior, all callers of
p4d/pud_free() should be fine because of our folding check within
p4d/pud_present/none(). But that doesn't mean that it is correct not
to check for the folding inside p4d/pud_free(). At least, with this
test module we do now have a caller of p4d/pud_free() on potentially
folded entries, so instead of adding pxx_folded() checks to this
test module, we could add them to our p4d/pud_free() functions.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Gerald
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
x86@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64504101-d9dd-f273-02f9-e9a8b178eecc@c-s.fr>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:26:03 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
[..]
> My suggestion was not to completely drop the #ifdef but to do like you
> did in pgd_clear_tests() for instance, ie to add the following test on
> top of the function:
>
> if (mm_pud_folded(mm) || is_defined(__ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK))
> return;
>
Ah, very nice, this would also fix the remaining issues for s390. Since
we have dynamic page table folding, neither __PAGETABLE_PXX_FOLDED nor
__ARCH_HAS_XLEVEL_HACK is defined, but mm_pxx_folded() will work.
mm_alloc() returns with a 3-level page table by default on s390, so we
will run into issues in p4d_clear/populate_tests(), and also at the end
with p4d/pud_free() (double free).
So, adding the mm_pud_folded() check to p4d_clear/populate_tests(),
and also adding mm_p4d/pud_folded() checks at the end before calling
p4d/pud_free(), would make it all work on s390.
BTW, regarding p4d/pud_free(), I'm not sure if we should rather check
the folding inside our s390 functions, similar to how we do it for
p4d/pud_free_tlb(), instead of relying on not being called for folded
p4d/pud. So far, I see no problem with this behavior, all callers of
p4d/pud_free() should be fine because of our folding check within
p4d/pud_present/none(). But that doesn't mean that it is correct not
to check for the folding inside p4d/pud_free(). At least, with this
test module we do now have a caller of p4d/pud_free() on potentially
folded entries, so instead of adding pxx_folded() checks to this
test module, we could add them to our p4d/pud_free() functions.
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Gerald
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 6:02 [PATCH V2 0/2] mm/debug: Add tests for architecture exported page table helpers Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Make alloc_gigantic_page() available for general use Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-12 12:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 12:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 12:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 12:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 12:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 15:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:23 ` [PATCH] mm/pgtable/debug: Fix " Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 7:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 8:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 8:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 8:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 8:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 8:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-18 7:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 7:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 7:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 7:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 7:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 9:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add " Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 9:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 9:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 9:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 9:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 9:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 5:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 5:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 5:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 5:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 5:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-18 18:22 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2019-09-18 18:22 ` Gerald Schaefer
2019-09-18 18:22 ` Gerald Schaefer
2019-09-18 18:22 ` Gerald Schaefer
2019-09-18 18:22 ` Gerald Schaefer
2019-09-20 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-20 4:18 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-20 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-20 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-20 4:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 4:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-19 5:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-19 5:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 14:42 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] mm/debug: Add tests for architecture exported " Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 14:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 14:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 14:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-12 14:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-09-13 6:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-09-13 6:32 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190918202243.37e709df@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Steven.Price@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schowdary@nvidia.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.