[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/6] arm: Add missing test name prefix calls

From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/6] arm: Add missing test name prefix calls
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:42:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190927104227.253466-7-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927104227.253466-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>

When running the unit tests in TAP mode (./run_tests.sh -t), every single
test result is printed. This works fine for most tests which use the
reporting prefix feature to indicate the actual test name.
However psci and pci were missing those names, so the reporting left
people scratching their head what was actually tested:
...
ok 74 - invalid-function
ok 75 - affinity-info-on
ok 76 - affinity-info-off
ok 77 - cpu-on

Push a "psci" prefix before running those tests to make those report
lines more descriptive.
While at it, do the same for pci, even though it is less ambigious there.
Also the GIC ITARGETSR test was missing a report_prefix_pop().

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 arm/gic.c      | 2 ++
 arm/pci-test.c | 2 ++
 arm/psci.c     | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
index 66dcafe..ebb6ea2 100644
--- a/arm/gic.c
+++ b/arm/gic.c
@@ -480,6 +480,8 @@ static void test_targets(int nr_irqs)
 	test_byte_access(targetsptr + GIC_FIRST_SPI, pattern, cpu_mask);
 
 	writel(orig_targets, targetsptr + GIC_FIRST_SPI);
+
+	report_prefix_pop();
 }
 
 static void gic_test_mmio(void)
diff --git a/arm/pci-test.c b/arm/pci-test.c
index cf128ac..7c3836e 100644
--- a/arm/pci-test.c
+++ b/arm/pci-test.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ int main(void)
 		return report_summary();
 	}
 
+	report_prefix_push("pci");
+
 	pci_print();
 
 	ret = pci_testdev();
diff --git a/arm/psci.c b/arm/psci.c
index 5cb4d5c..536c9b7 100644
--- a/arm/psci.c
+++ b/arm/psci.c
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ int main(void)
 {
 	int ver = psci_invoke(PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION, 0, 0, 0);
 
+	report_prefix_push("psci");
+
 	if (nr_cpus < 2) {
 		report_skip("At least 2 cpus required");
 		goto done;
-- 
2.17.1

