All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Liang,
	Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/22] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:11:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007181113.GC13229@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e570d6d-b29f-f4cb-1eb9-6ff6cab15a2e@arm.com>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 07/10/2019 17:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> >> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> >> index 902f5fa6bf93..34fe904dd417 100644
> >> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> >> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void hmm_range_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static int hmm_vma_walk_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> >> -			     struct mm_walk *walk)
> >> +			     __always_unused int depth, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > 
> > It this __always_unused on function arguments something we are doing
> > now?
> 
> $ git grep __always_unused | wc -l
> 191
> 
> It's elsewhere in the kernel tree. It seems like a good way of both
> documenting and silencing compiler warnings. But I'm open to other
> suggestions.

The normal kernel build doesn't generate warnings for unused function
parameters because there are alot of false positives, IIRC. So, seems
weird to see things like this.

> > Can we have negative depth? Should it be unsigned?
> 
> As per the documentation added in this patch:
> 
>  * @pte_hole:	if set, called for each hole at all levels,
>  *		depth is -1 if not known, 0:PGD, 1:P4D, 2:PUD, 3:PMD
>  *		4:PTE. Any folded depths (where PTRS_PER_P?D is equal
>  *		to 1) are skipped.
> 
> So it's signed to allow "-1" in the cases where pte_hole is called
> without knowing the actual depth. This is used in the function
> walk_page_test() because it don't walk the actual page tables, but is
> called on a VMA instead. This means that there may not be a single depth
> for the range provided.

So are the depth values below OK? I would have expected -1 by this
definition

> >>  {
> >>  	struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private;
> >>  	struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range;
> >> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> >>  again:
> >>  	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> >>  	if (pmd_none(pmd))
> >> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  	if (thp_migration_supported() && is_pmd_migration_entry(pmd)) {
> >>  		bool fault, write_fault;
> >> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >>  again:
> >>  	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> >>  	if (pud_none(pud))
> >> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
> >>  		unsigned long i, npages, pfn;
> >> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >>  		bool fault, write_fault;
> >>  
> >>  		if (!pud_present(pud))
> >> -			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  		i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>  		npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Liang,
	Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/22] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:11:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007181113.GC13229@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e570d6d-b29f-f4cb-1eb9-6ff6cab15a2e@arm.com>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 07/10/2019 17:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> >> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> >> index 902f5fa6bf93..34fe904dd417 100644
> >> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> >> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void hmm_range_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static int hmm_vma_walk_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> >> -			     struct mm_walk *walk)
> >> +			     __always_unused int depth, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > 
> > It this __always_unused on function arguments something we are doing
> > now?
> 
> $ git grep __always_unused | wc -l
> 191
> 
> It's elsewhere in the kernel tree. It seems like a good way of both
> documenting and silencing compiler warnings. But I'm open to other
> suggestions.

The normal kernel build doesn't generate warnings for unused function
parameters because there are alot of false positives, IIRC. So, seems
weird to see things like this.

> > Can we have negative depth? Should it be unsigned?
> 
> As per the documentation added in this patch:
> 
>  * @pte_hole:	if set, called for each hole at all levels,
>  *		depth is -1 if not known, 0:PGD, 1:P4D, 2:PUD, 3:PMD
>  *		4:PTE. Any folded depths (where PTRS_PER_P?D is equal
>  *		to 1) are skipped.
> 
> So it's signed to allow "-1" in the cases where pte_hole is called
> without knowing the actual depth. This is used in the function
> walk_page_test() because it don't walk the actual page tables, but is
> called on a VMA instead. This means that there may not be a single depth
> for the range provided.

So are the depth values below OK? I would have expected -1 by this
definition

> >>  {
> >>  	struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private;
> >>  	struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range;
> >> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> >>  again:
> >>  	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> >>  	if (pmd_none(pmd))
> >> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  	if (thp_migration_supported() && is_pmd_migration_entry(pmd)) {
> >>  		bool fault, write_fault;
> >> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >>  again:
> >>  	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> >>  	if (pud_none(pud))
> >> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
> >>  		unsigned long i, npages, pfn;
> >> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >>  		bool fault, write_fault;
> >>  
> >>  		if (!pud_present(pud))
> >> -			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
> >> +			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
> >>  
> >>  		i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>  		npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-07 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07 15:38 [PATCH v11 00/22] Generic page walk and ptdump Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 01/22] mm: Add generic p?d_leaf() macros Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 02/22] arc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-08 20:19   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-10-08 20:19     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 03/22] arm: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 04/22] arm64: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 05/22] mips: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 06/22] powerpc: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 07/22] riscv: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-08 11:31   ` Alex Ghiti
2019-10-08 11:31     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-10-08 11:31     ` Alex Ghiti
2019-10-08 21:33   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-08 21:33     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-08 21:33     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-09 10:55     ` Steven Price
2019-10-09 10:55       ` Steven Price
2019-10-09 10:55       ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 08/22] s390: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 09/22] sparc: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 10/22] x86: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 11/22] mm: pagewalk: Add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry() Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 12/22] mm: pagewalk: Allow walking without vma Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 13/22] mm: pagewalk: Add test_p?d callbacks Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 14/22] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 16:10   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-07 16:10     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-07 16:20     ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 16:20       ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 18:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-07 18:11         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 11:00         ` Steven Price
2019-10-09 11:00           ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 15/22] x86: mm: Point to struct seq_file from struct pg_state Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 16/22] x86: mm+efi: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level() to take a mm_struct Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 17/22] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs() to take an mm_struct Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 18/22] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_core() " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 19/22] mm: Add generic ptdump Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 20/22] x86: mm: Convert dump_pagetables to use walk_page_range Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 21/22] arm64: mm: Convert mm/dump.c to use walk_page_range() Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 22/22] arm64: mm: Display non-present entries in ptdump Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38   ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191007181113.GC13229@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.