From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:25:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > > preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> > > standardize the identifier for the PT_NOTE entry to "note" as used by
> > > all other architectures that emit PT_NOTE.
> >
> > All other archs are wrong, and "notes" is a much better name. This
> > segment does not contain a single "note", but multiple "notes".
>
> True, but the naming appears to be based off the Program Header name of
> "PT_NOTE".
Ah, so that's why the kernel segment (which isn't text btw, it's rwx) is
called "load" :-P
(Not convinced. Some arch just got it wrong, and many others blindly
copied it? That sounds a lot more likely imo.)
> Regardless, it is an entirely internal-to-the-linker-script
> identifier, so I am just consolidating on a common name with the least
> number of collateral changes.
Yes, that's what I'm complaining about.
Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with
a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you?
Segher
p.s. Thanks for doing this, removing the powerpc workaround etc. :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:25:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > > preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> > > standardize the identifier for the PT_NOTE entry to "note" as used by
> > > all other architectures that emit PT_NOTE.
> >
> > All other archs are wrong, and "notes" is a much better name. This
> > segment does not contain a single "note", but multiple "notes".
>
> True, but the naming appears to be based off the Program Header name of
> "PT_NOTE".
Ah, so that's why the kernel segment (which isn't text btw, it's rwx) is
called "load" :-P
(Not convinced. Some arch just got it wrong, and many others blindly
copied it? That sounds a lot more likely imo.)
> Regardless, it is an entirely internal-to-the-linker-script
> identifier, so I am just consolidating on a common name with the least
> number of collateral changes.
Yes, that's what I'm complaining about.
Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with
a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you?
Segher
p.s. Thanks for doing this, removing the powerpc workaround etc. :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:25:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > > preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> > > standardize the identifier for the PT_NOTE entry to "note" as used by
> > > all other architectures that emit PT_NOTE.
> >
> > All other archs are wrong, and "notes" is a much better name. This
> > segment does not contain a single "note", but multiple "notes".
>
> True, but the naming appears to be based off the Program Header name of
> "PT_NOTE".
Ah, so that's why the kernel segment (which isn't text btw, it's rwx) is
called "load" :-P
(Not convinced. Some arch just got it wrong, and many others blindly
copied it? That sounds a lot more likely imo.)
> Regardless, it is an entirely internal-to-the-linker-script
> identifier, so I am just consolidating on a common name with the least
> number of collateral changes.
Yes, that's what I'm complaining about.
Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with
a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you?
Segher
p.s. Thanks for doing this, removing the powerpc workaround etc. :-)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:25:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > > preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> > > standardize the identifier for the PT_NOTE entry to "note" as used by
> > > all other architectures that emit PT_NOTE.
> >
> > All other archs are wrong, and "notes" is a much better name. This
> > segment does not contain a single "note", but multiple "notes".
>
> True, but the naming appears to be based off the Program Header name of
> "PT_NOTE".
Ah, so that's why the kernel segment (which isn't text btw, it's rwx) is
called "load" :-P
(Not convinced. Some arch just got it wrong, and many others blindly
copied it? That sounds a lot more likely imo.)
> Regardless, it is an entirely internal-to-the-linker-script
> identifier, so I am just consolidating on a common name with the least
> number of collateral changes.
Yes, that's what I'm complaining about.
Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with
a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you?
Segher
p.s. Thanks for doing this, removing the powerpc workaround etc. :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 236+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 0:05 [PATCH v2 00/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Refactor EXCEPTION_TABLE and NOTES Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note" Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 8:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 8:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 8:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 8:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-15 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-15 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-15 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-15 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-15 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-15 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-15 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-15 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-29 21:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-29 21:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-29 21:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-29 21:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-30 1:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-30 1:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-30 1:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-10-30 1:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-11-04 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-04 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-04 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-04 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/29] powerpc: Remove PT_NOTE workaround Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/29] powerpc: Rename PT_LOAD identifier "kernel" to "text" Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/29] alpha: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/29] ia64: Rename PT_LOAD identifier "code" " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/29] s390: Move RO_DATA into "text" PT_LOAD Program Header Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-16 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/29] x86: Restore "text" Program Header with dummy section Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Provide EMIT_PT_NOTE to indicate export of .notes Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Move Program Header restoration into NOTES macro Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Move NOTES into RO_DATA Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Replace RODATA with RO_DATA Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 16:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 16:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 16:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 16:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 16:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-11 18:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 18:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 18:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 18:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-11 18:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-12 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-12 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-12 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-12 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-12 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Replace RO_DATA_SECTION " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Replace RW_DATA_SECTION with RW_DATA Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 14/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Allow EXCEPTION_TABLE to live in RO_DATA Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 15/29] x86: Actually use _etext for end of text segment Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 16/29] x86: Move EXCEPTION_TABLE to RO_DATA segment Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/29] alpha: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/29] arm64: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/29] c6x: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 20/29] h8300: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 21/29] ia64: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 22/29] microblaze: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 23/29] parisc: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-12 9:50 ` Helge Deller
2019-10-12 9:50 ` Helge Deller
2019-10-12 9:50 ` Helge Deller
2019-10-12 9:50 ` Helge Deller
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 24/29] powerpc: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 25/29] xtensa: " Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-14 7:41 ` Max Filippov
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 26/29] x86/mm: Remove redundant &s on addresses Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 27/29] x86/mm: Report which part of kernel image is freed Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 28/29] x86/mm: Report actual image regions in /proc/iomem Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 29/29] x86: Use INT3 instead of NOP for linker fill bytes Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-11 0:06 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-16 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Refactor EXCEPTION_TABLE and NOTES Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:28 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:28 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-16 8:28 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.