From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:05:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191220170525.GC549437@yoga> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCk7NoaWw8Tor-P02SESztWEGpGMK6GbRNG45yMVYhMdDCEnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 20 Dec 06:33 PST 2019, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:00 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 18 Dec 05:22 PST 2019, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes for MSM8998 SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi | 8 ++
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > index 6db3f9e0344d1..e87094665c52c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > @@ -312,6 +312,14 @@
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&remoteproc_slpi {
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > &tlmm {
> > > gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>, <81 4>;
> > > };
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > index 8d799e868a5d3..014127700afb0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > @@ -1075,6 +1075,61 @@
> > > #interrupt-cells = <0x2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_mss: remoteproc@4080000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil";
> > > + reg = <0x04080000 0x100>, <0x04180000 0x20>;
> > > + reg-names = "qdsp6", "rmb";
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended =
> > > + <&intc GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack",
> > > + "shutdown-ack";
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_MSS_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_BIMC_MSS_Q6_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_BOOT_ROM_AHB_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_MNOC_BIMC_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> >
> > RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC doesn't seem to be implemented...
> >
> > I did pull in a patch from Jeff that defines it, but when I boot the
> > modem I see the following error repeatedly:
>
> Yeah, we need to figure out a solution for rpmcc to actually provide
> this since the previous N solutions were not acceptable. Its on my
> todo list to look into in Jan. However, I really think the DT should
> be defined this way, since it replicates the hardware config.
>
I presume you can't rely on parent_data due to issues before rpmcc has
probed properly?
Not sure what to do about that, perhaps we can stop-gap by adding the
new clock and setting up the DT, and then swing back to wiring it up
internally in gcc later?
> >
> > [ 616.632227] qcom-q6v5-mss 4080000.remoteproc: fatal error received: dog_hb.c:266:DOG_HB detects starvation of task 0xda172640, triage with its own
>
> Maybe the BIMC fix will address this?
>
Just applying "clk: qcom: smd: Add missing bimc clock" did not change
things.
So just to be clear, I'm testing this with the following patches on top
of linux-next:
clk: qcom: smd: Add missing bimc clock
clk: qcom: smd: Add XO clock for MSM8998
arm64: dts: msm8998: Add xo clock to gcc node
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Update reserved memory map
remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add MSM8998 ADSP and SLPI support
dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add ADSP and SLPI support for MSM8998 SoC
remoteproc: q6v5-mss: Remove mem clk from the active pool
phy: qcom-qmp: Add optional SW reset
phy: qcom-qmp: Increase the phy init timeout
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> >
> >
> > All the qrtr services seems registered nicely, so the remote does come
> > up before it goes down.
> >
> > Also, adsp comes up nicely.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > + clock-names = "iface", "bus", "mem", "gpll0_mss",
> > > + "snoc_axi", "mnoc_axi", "qdss", "xo";
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&modem_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + resets = <&gcc GCC_MSS_RESTART>;
> > > + reset-names = "mss_restart";
> > > +
> > > + qcom,halt-regs = <&tcsr_mutex_regs 0x23000 0x25000 0x24000>;
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDCX>,
> > > + <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDMX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "cx", "mx";
> > > +
> > > + mba {
> > > + memory-region = <&mba_mem>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + mpss {
> > > + memory-region = <&mpss_mem>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 452 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "modem";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <1>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 15>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > gpucc: clock-controller@5065000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,msm8998-gpucc";
> > > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > > @@ -1088,6 +1143,42 @@
> > > "gpll0";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_slpi: remoteproc@5800000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-slpi-pas";
> > > + reg = <0x05800000 0x4040>;
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 390 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack";
> > > +
> > > + px-supply = <&vreg_lvs2a_1p8>;
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>;
> > > + clock-names = "xo", "aggre2";
> > > +
> > > + memory-region = <&slpi_mem>;
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&slpi_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_SSCCX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "ssc_cx";
> > > +
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "dsps";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <3>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 27>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > stm: stm@6002000 {
> > > compatible = "arm,coresight-stm", "arm,primecell";
> > > reg = <0x06002000 0x1000>,
> > > @@ -1880,6 +1971,39 @@
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_adsp: remoteproc@17300000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-adsp-pas";
> > > + reg = <0x17300000 0x4040>;
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 162 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack";
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> > > + clock-names = "xo";
> > > +
> > > + memory-region = <&adsp_mem>;
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&adsp_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDCX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "cx";
> > > +
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 157 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "lpass";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <2>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 9>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > apcs_glb: mailbox@17911000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,msm8998-apcs-hmss-global";
> > > reg = <0x17911000 0x1000>;
> > > --
> > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:05:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191220170525.GC549437@yoga> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCk7NoaWw8Tor-P02SESztWEGpGMK6GbRNG45yMVYhMdDCEnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 20 Dec 06:33 PST 2019, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:00 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 18 Dec 05:22 PST 2019, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes for MSM8998 SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi | 8 ++
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > index 6db3f9e0344d1..e87094665c52c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi
> > > @@ -312,6 +312,14 @@
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&remoteproc_slpi {
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > &tlmm {
> > > gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>, <81 4>;
> > > };
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > index 8d799e868a5d3..014127700afb0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> > > @@ -1075,6 +1075,61 @@
> > > #interrupt-cells = <0x2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_mss: remoteproc@4080000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil";
> > > + reg = <0x04080000 0x100>, <0x04180000 0x20>;
> > > + reg-names = "qdsp6", "rmb";
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended =
> > > + <&intc GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&modem_smp2p_in 7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack",
> > > + "shutdown-ack";
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_MSS_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_BIMC_MSS_Q6_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_BOOT_ROM_AHB_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&gcc GCC_MSS_MNOC_BIMC_AXI_CLK>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> >
> > RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC doesn't seem to be implemented...
> >
> > I did pull in a patch from Jeff that defines it, but when I boot the
> > modem I see the following error repeatedly:
>
> Yeah, we need to figure out a solution for rpmcc to actually provide
> this since the previous N solutions were not acceptable. Its on my
> todo list to look into in Jan. However, I really think the DT should
> be defined this way, since it replicates the hardware config.
>
I presume you can't rely on parent_data due to issues before rpmcc has
probed properly?
Not sure what to do about that, perhaps we can stop-gap by adding the
new clock and setting up the DT, and then swing back to wiring it up
internally in gcc later?
> >
> > [ 616.632227] qcom-q6v5-mss 4080000.remoteproc: fatal error received: dog_hb.c:266:DOG_HB detects starvation of task 0xda172640, triage with its own
>
> Maybe the BIMC fix will address this?
>
Just applying "clk: qcom: smd: Add missing bimc clock" did not change
things.
So just to be clear, I'm testing this with the following patches on top
of linux-next:
clk: qcom: smd: Add missing bimc clock
clk: qcom: smd: Add XO clock for MSM8998
arm64: dts: msm8998: Add xo clock to gcc node
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Update reserved memory map
remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add MSM8998 ADSP and SLPI support
dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add ADSP and SLPI support for MSM8998 SoC
remoteproc: q6v5-mss: Remove mem clk from the active pool
phy: qcom-qmp: Add optional SW reset
phy: qcom-qmp: Increase the phy init timeout
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> >
> >
> > All the qrtr services seems registered nicely, so the remote does come
> > up before it goes down.
> >
> > Also, adsp comes up nicely.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > + clock-names = "iface", "bus", "mem", "gpll0_mss",
> > > + "snoc_axi", "mnoc_axi", "qdss", "xo";
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&modem_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + resets = <&gcc GCC_MSS_RESTART>;
> > > + reset-names = "mss_restart";
> > > +
> > > + qcom,halt-regs = <&tcsr_mutex_regs 0x23000 0x25000 0x24000>;
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDCX>,
> > > + <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDMX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "cx", "mx";
> > > +
> > > + mba {
> > > + memory-region = <&mba_mem>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + mpss {
> > > + memory-region = <&mpss_mem>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 452 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "modem";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <1>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 15>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > gpucc: clock-controller@5065000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,msm8998-gpucc";
> > > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > > @@ -1088,6 +1143,42 @@
> > > "gpll0";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_slpi: remoteproc@5800000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-slpi-pas";
> > > + reg = <0x05800000 0x4040>;
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 390 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&slpi_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack";
> > > +
> > > + px-supply = <&vreg_lvs2a_1p8>;
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> > > + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>;
> > > + clock-names = "xo", "aggre2";
> > > +
> > > + memory-region = <&slpi_mem>;
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&slpi_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_SSCCX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "ssc_cx";
> > > +
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "dsps";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <3>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 27>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > stm: stm@6002000 {
> > > compatible = "arm,coresight-stm", "arm,primecell";
> > > reg = <0x06002000 0x1000>,
> > > @@ -1880,6 +1971,39 @@
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + remoteproc_adsp: remoteproc@17300000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-adsp-pas";
> > > + reg = <0x17300000 0x4040>;
> > > +
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 162 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > > + <&adsp_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready",
> > > + "handover", "stop-ack";
> > > +
> > > + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
> > > + clock-names = "xo";
> > > +
> > > + memory-region = <&adsp_mem>;
> > > +
> > > + qcom,smem-states = <&adsp_smp2p_out 0>;
> > > + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > > +
> > > + power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8998_VDDCX>;
> > > + power-domain-names = "cx";
> > > +
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 157 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + label = "lpass";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <2>;
> > > + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 9>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > apcs_glb: mailbox@17911000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,msm8998-apcs-hmss-global";
> > > reg = <0x17911000 0x1000>;
> > > --
> > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-20 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 13:22 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add the missing remoteprocs on MSM8998 Sibi Sankar
2019-12-18 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] remoteproc: q6v5-mss: Remove mem clk from the active pool Sibi Sankar
2019-12-18 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add ADSP and SLPI support for MSM8998 SoC Sibi Sankar
2019-12-18 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add MSM8998 ADSP and SLPI support Sibi Sankar
2019-12-18 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Update reserved memory map Sibi Sankar
2019-12-18 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add ADSP, MPSS and SLPI nodes Sibi Sankar
2019-12-20 6:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-20 7:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-20 14:33 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-12-20 17:05 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2019-12-20 17:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-20 17:10 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-12-20 18:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-20 18:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-20 18:04 ` Jeffrey Hugo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191220170525.GC549437@yoga \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.