From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span()
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:48:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205144811.GF26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205095924.GC24162@richard>
Hi Wei Yang,
On 02/05/20 at 05:59pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644
> >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > if (pfn) {
> > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
> > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
> >+ } else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > }
> > } else if (zone_end_pfn = end_pfn) {
> > /*
> >@@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > start_pfn);
> > if (pfn)
> > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
> >+ else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> >+ }
> > }
>
> If it is me, I would like to take out these two similar logic out.
I also like this style.
>
> For example:
>
> if () {
> } else if () {
> } else {
> goto out;
Here the last else is unnecessary, right?
> }
>
>
Like this, I believe both David and I will be satisfactory. Even though
I still think his 2nd resetting is not needed :-)
> /* The zone has no valid section */
> if (!pfn) {
> zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> }
>
> out:
> zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>
> Well, this is just my personal taste :-)
>
> >-
> >- /*
> >- * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it
> >- * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not
> >- * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
> >- * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> >- */
> >- pfn = zone_start_pfn;
> >- for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> >- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* Skip range to be removed */
> >- if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> >- zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> >- return;
> >- }
> >-
> >- /* The zone has no valid section */
> >- zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >- zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.21.0
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205144811.GF26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205095924.GC24162@richard>
Hi Wei Yang,
On 02/05/20 at 05:59pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644
> >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > if (pfn) {
> > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
> > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
> >+ } else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > }
> > } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
> > /*
> >@@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > start_pfn);
> > if (pfn)
> > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
> >+ else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> >+ }
> > }
>
> If it is me, I would like to take out these two similar logic out.
I also like this style.
>
> For example:
>
> if () {
> } else if () {
> } else {
> goto out;
Here the last else is unnecessary, right?
> }
>
>
Like this, I believe both David and I will be satisfactory. Even though
I still think his 2nd resetting is not needed :-)
> /* The zone has no valid section */
> if (!pfn) {
> zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> }
>
> out:
> zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>
> Well, this is just my personal taste :-)
>
> >-
> >- /*
> >- * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it
> >- * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not
> >- * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
> >- * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> >- */
> >- pfn = zone_start_pfn;
> >- for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> >- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* Skip range to be removed */
> >- if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> >- zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> >- return;
> >- }
> >-
> >- /* The zone has no valid section */
> >- zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >- zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.21.0
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205144811.GF26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205095924.GC24162@richard>
Hi Wei Yang,
On 02/05/20 at 05:59pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644
> >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > if (pfn) {
> > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
> > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
> >+ } else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > }
> > } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
> > /*
> >@@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > start_pfn);
> > if (pfn)
> > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
> >+ else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> >+ }
> > }
>
> If it is me, I would like to take out these two similar logic out.
I also like this style.
>
> For example:
>
> if () {
> } else if () {
> } else {
> goto out;
Here the last else is unnecessary, right?
> }
>
>
Like this, I believe both David and I will be satisfactory. Even though
I still think his 2nd resetting is not needed :-)
> /* The zone has no valid section */
> if (!pfn) {
> zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> }
>
> out:
> zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>
> Well, this is just my personal taste :-)
>
> >-
> >- /*
> >- * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it
> >- * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not
> >- * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
> >- * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> >- */
> >- pfn = zone_start_pfn;
> >- for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> >- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* Skip range to be removed */
> >- if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> >- zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> >- return;
> >- }
> >-
> >- /* The zone has no valid section */
> >- zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >- zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.21.0
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205144811.GF26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205095924.GC24162@richard>
Hi Wei Yang,
On 02/05/20 at 05:59pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644
> >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > if (pfn) {
> > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
> > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
> >+ } else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > }
> > } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
> > /*
> >@@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > start_pfn);
> > if (pfn)
> > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
> >+ else {
> >+ zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >+ zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> >+ }
> > }
>
> If it is me, I would like to take out these two similar logic out.
I also like this style.
>
> For example:
>
> if () {
> } else if () {
> } else {
> goto out;
Here the last else is unnecessary, right?
> }
>
>
Like this, I believe both David and I will be satisfactory. Even though
I still think his 2nd resetting is not needed :-)
> /* The zone has no valid section */
> if (!pfn) {
> zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> }
>
> out:
> zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>
> Well, this is just my personal taste :-)
>
> >-
> >- /*
> >- * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it
> >- * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not
> >- * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
> >- * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> >- */
> >- pfn = zone_start_pfn;
> >- for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> >- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* Skip range to be removed */
> >- if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
> >- continue;
> >-
> >- /* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> >- zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> >- return;
> >- }
> >-
> >- /* The zone has no valid section */
> >- zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> >- zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> > zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.21.0
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 263+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-06 8:56 [PATCH v6 00/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones before removing memory David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] mm/memunmap: Don't access uninitialized memmap in memunmap_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 19:58 ` Damian Tometzki
2019-10-06 19:58 ` Damian Tometzki
2019-10-06 19:58 ` Damian Tometzki
2019-10-06 19:58 ` Damian Tometzki
2019-10-06 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] mm/memmap_init: Update variable name in memmap_init_zone David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't access uninitialized memmaps in shrink_pgdat_span() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't access uninitialized memmaps in shrink_zone_span() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-14 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-14 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-14 19:17 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-19 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-19 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-19 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-19 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-19 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-19 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-19 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-19 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones when offlining memory David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-14 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-14 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-27 22:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-27 22:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-30 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-30 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2019-11-30 23:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-30 23:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-18 17:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-18 17:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-18 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
2019-12-18 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
2019-12-03 15:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-12-03 15:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-12-03 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-03 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-03 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-03 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Poison memmap in remove_pfn_range_from_zone() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 8:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 8:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 8:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 8:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] mm/memory_hotplug: We always have a zone in find_(smallest|biggest)_section_pfn David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-05 8:57 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 8:57 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 8:57 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 8:57 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 9:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:26 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 14:25 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-04 14:25 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-04 14:25 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-04 14:25 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-04 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 12:43 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 12:43 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 12:43 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 12:43 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:34 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 13:34 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 13:34 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 13:34 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:26 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:26 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:26 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:26 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 9:59 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:59 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:59 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 9:59 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 14:48 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-02-05 14:48 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:48 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 14:48 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 22:56 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 22:56 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 22:56 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 22:56 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:08 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:08 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:08 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:08 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:30 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:30 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:30 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:30 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 23:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 23:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 14:54 ` David Laight
2020-02-05 14:54 ` David Laight
2020-02-05 14:54 ` David Laight
2020-02-05 14:54 ` David Laight
2020-02-05 14:54 ` David Laight
2020-02-05 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop local variables " David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 10:07 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 10:07 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 10:07 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 10:07 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Cleanup __remove_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 13:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-04 13:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-04 13:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-04 13:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-04 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 12:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-05 12:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-05 12:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-05 12:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-05 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-05 11:48 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 11:48 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 11:48 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-05 11:48 ` Wei Yang
2019-12-02 9:09 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones before removing memory David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-03 13:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-12-03 13:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-01-31 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-01-31 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-01-31 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-31 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-31 10:03 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-31 10:03 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-31 10:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-31 10:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 1:46 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-04 1:46 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-04 8:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 8:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-04 9:51 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-02-04 9:51 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205144811.GF26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.