All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes together
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:55:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220085559.GE4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220071233.GA592@richard>

On 02/20/20 at 03:12pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >On 02/20/20 at 02:18pm, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:33:15PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> >No functional change.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> Those functions are introduced in your previous patches.
> >> 
> >> Is it possible to define them close to each other at the very beginning?
> >
> >Thanks for reviewing.
> >
> >Do you mean to discard this patch and keep it as they are in the patch 4/7?
> >If yes, it's fine to me to drop it as you suggested. To me, I prefer to put
> >all subsection map handling codes together.
> >
> 
> I mean when you introduce clear_subsection_map() in patch 3, is it possible to
> move close to the definition of fill_subsection_map()?
> 
> Since finally you are will to move them together.

Oh, got it. Yeah, I just put them close to their callers separately. I
think it's also good to put them together as you suggested, but it
doesn't matter much, right? I will consider this and see if I can adjust
it if v3 is needed. Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-20  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20  4:33 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm/hotplug: Only use subsection map in VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/hotplug: fix hot remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-20  6:11   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-20 12:07   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 12:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-26 13:07     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-26 18:09   ` Dan Williams
2020-02-26 18:09     ` Dan Williams
2020-03-03  8:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-03  8:39     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/sparse.c: introduce new function fill_subsection_map() Baoquan He
2020-02-20  6:14   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-28 14:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-01  4:59     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/sparse.c: introduce a new function clear_subsection_map() Baoquan He
2020-02-20  6:15   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-28 14:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-01  5:20     ` Baoquan He
2020-03-02 15:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-03  1:53         ` Baoquan He
2020-03-03  8:22         ` Baoquan He
2020-03-03  8:33           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-03  8:38             ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/sparse.c: only use subsection map in VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-20  6:17   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-25  9:57   ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26  3:53     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-26  9:10       ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-28  7:25         ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/sparse.c: add code comment about sub-section hotplug Baoquan He
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes together Baoquan He
2020-02-20  6:18   ` Wei Yang
2020-02-20  7:04     ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20  7:12       ` Wei Yang
2020-02-20  8:55         ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-02-20 21:52           ` Wei Yang
2020-02-20  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/sparse.c: Use __get_free_pages() instead in populate_section_memmap() Baoquan He
2020-02-20 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] mm/hotplug: Only use subsection map in VMEMMAP case Michal Hocko
2020-02-21 14:28   ` Baoquan He
2020-02-25  9:10     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 10:02       ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26  3:42         ` Baoquan He
2020-02-26  9:14           ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26 12:30             ` Baoquan He
2020-02-25 10:03     ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26  3:44       ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200220085559.GE4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.