All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Cc: "jun.li@freescale.com" <jun.li@freescale.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] USB IMX Chipidea fix gpio vbus control
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:39:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227143914.mi3vsltrtyo5sqed@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB53270541BB66CAB1EB8F00008BEB0@VI1PR04MB5327.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Peter,

On 20-02-27 13:30, Peter Chen wrote:
>   
> > > >
> > > > Note, I'm using a imx6q which has the CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON set.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do you have a VBUS regulator at your dts, and add it at controller's
> > > node? See: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi as an example please?
> > 
> > Yes, that's my use case too.
> > 
> > > If you have set CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON, the VBUS is controlled by
> > > chipidea driver, not by USB core through PORTSC.PP (ehci_ci_portpower).
> > 
> > I know, pls have a look my the patches.
> > 
> > I had the problem that the vbus regulator wasn't turned off during a
> > suspend/resume logic. The first issue within the usb-core should be fixed by [1] (v2
> > RFC is on the way). You never run in that case if you don't fix this. After I fixed it
> > the port-power is called during suspend but obviously the regulator didn't get turned
> > off because we don't add it to the priv->reg_vbus.
> > 
> > This patchset should fix this and get rid of the CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON
> > flag.
> > 
>  
> Hi Marco,
> 
> I may understand your case now. At old USB port design, the VBUS is never allowed to
> turned off to response the USB wakeup event. But the expected behavior has changed
> after pm_qos_no_power_off is introduced for USB port, it is allowed the port is powered off.

Luckily we have git :) and I my archeological findings are:

 0ero Patch 2012-07-07) 1530280084c3 usb: chipidea: add imx platform driver
 1st  Patch 2012-10-23) ae0fb4b72c8d PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags support
 2nd  Patch 2013-01-23) ad493e5e5805 usb: add usb port auto power off mechanism
 3th  Patch 2014-10-13) 11a7e5940514 usb: ehci: add ehci_port_power interface
 4th  Patch 2014-10-13) c8679a2fb8de usb: chipidea: host: add portpower override
 5th  Patch 2015-02-11) 6adb9b7b5fb6 usb: chipidea: add a flag for turn on vbus early for host
 6th  Patch 2015-02-11) 659459174188 usb: chipidea: host: turn on vbus before add hcd if early vbus on is required

A few more details:
- Since day 0 the imx chipidea driver supports the regulator but it was
  only used to turn it on (0ero Patch). Later the regulator support was
  shifted to the core and optional.
- 1-2 Patch added the pm_qos_no_power_off support
- 3-4 Patch adds the support to disable the regulator
- 5-6 Patch adding a workaround for patches 3-4 which breaks the
  regulator power-off support.

So as you can see the pm_qos_no_power_off was introduced before the gpio
regulator vbus power-off support was added.

> PORTSC.PP could be controlled by USB core, but USB VBUS's power is not controlled
> by this bit if the VBUS power enable pin is configured as GPIO function, that is your case.

Yep I know :)

> CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON is introduced by fixing a bug that some i.mx USB
> controllers PHY's power is sourced from VBUS, the PHY's power need to be on before
> touch some ehci registers, otherwise, the USB signal will be wrong at some low speed
> devices use case. So, this flag can't be deleted, it may cause regression.

Pls check my archeological findings and again pls check my patches. I
deleted the flag because isn't required anymore afterwards.

> The solution I see is your may need to implement chipidea VBUS control flow by considering
> pm_qos_no_power_off at suspend situation. You may add .suspend API for ci_role_driver,
> and called by ci_controller_suspend/ci_controller_resume, of cos, better solution is welcome.

I fixed it within the core [1] and here at the chipidea side.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/27/669

You will never enter the ehci_ci_portpower() during suspend without [1]
if you are using a vanilla kernel. So IMHO this case can't be tested,
sorry.

Kind regards,
  Marco

> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jun.li@freescale.com" <jun.li@freescale.com>,
	"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] USB IMX Chipidea fix gpio vbus control
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:39:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227143914.mi3vsltrtyo5sqed@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB53270541BB66CAB1EB8F00008BEB0@VI1PR04MB5327.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Peter,

On 20-02-27 13:30, Peter Chen wrote:
>   
> > > >
> > > > Note, I'm using a imx6q which has the CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON set.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do you have a VBUS regulator at your dts, and add it at controller's
> > > node? See: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabresd.dtsi as an example please?
> > 
> > Yes, that's my use case too.
> > 
> > > If you have set CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON, the VBUS is controlled by
> > > chipidea driver, not by USB core through PORTSC.PP (ehci_ci_portpower).
> > 
> > I know, pls have a look my the patches.
> > 
> > I had the problem that the vbus regulator wasn't turned off during a
> > suspend/resume logic. The first issue within the usb-core should be fixed by [1] (v2
> > RFC is on the way). You never run in that case if you don't fix this. After I fixed it
> > the port-power is called during suspend but obviously the regulator didn't get turned
> > off because we don't add it to the priv->reg_vbus.
> > 
> > This patchset should fix this and get rid of the CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON
> > flag.
> > 
>  
> Hi Marco,
> 
> I may understand your case now. At old USB port design, the VBUS is never allowed to
> turned off to response the USB wakeup event. But the expected behavior has changed
> after pm_qos_no_power_off is introduced for USB port, it is allowed the port is powered off.

Luckily we have git :) and I my archeological findings are:

 0ero Patch 2012-07-07) 1530280084c3 usb: chipidea: add imx platform driver
 1st  Patch 2012-10-23) ae0fb4b72c8d PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags support
 2nd  Patch 2013-01-23) ad493e5e5805 usb: add usb port auto power off mechanism
 3th  Patch 2014-10-13) 11a7e5940514 usb: ehci: add ehci_port_power interface
 4th  Patch 2014-10-13) c8679a2fb8de usb: chipidea: host: add portpower override
 5th  Patch 2015-02-11) 6adb9b7b5fb6 usb: chipidea: add a flag for turn on vbus early for host
 6th  Patch 2015-02-11) 659459174188 usb: chipidea: host: turn on vbus before add hcd if early vbus on is required

A few more details:
- Since day 0 the imx chipidea driver supports the regulator but it was
  only used to turn it on (0ero Patch). Later the regulator support was
  shifted to the core and optional.
- 1-2 Patch added the pm_qos_no_power_off support
- 3-4 Patch adds the support to disable the regulator
- 5-6 Patch adding a workaround for patches 3-4 which breaks the
  regulator power-off support.

So as you can see the pm_qos_no_power_off was introduced before the gpio
regulator vbus power-off support was added.

> PORTSC.PP could be controlled by USB core, but USB VBUS's power is not controlled
> by this bit if the VBUS power enable pin is configured as GPIO function, that is your case.

Yep I know :)

> CI_HDRC_TURN_VBUS_EARLY_ON is introduced by fixing a bug that some i.mx USB
> controllers PHY's power is sourced from VBUS, the PHY's power need to be on before
> touch some ehci registers, otherwise, the USB signal will be wrong at some low speed
> devices use case. So, this flag can't be deleted, it may cause regression.

Pls check my archeological findings and again pls check my patches. I
deleted the flag because isn't required anymore afterwards.

> The solution I see is your may need to implement chipidea VBUS control flow by considering
> pm_qos_no_power_off at suspend situation. You may add .suspend API for ci_role_driver,
> and called by ci_controller_suspend/ci_controller_resume, of cos, better solution is welcome.

I fixed it within the core [1] and here at the chipidea side.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/27/669

You will never enter the ehci_ci_portpower() during suspend without [1]
if you are using a vanilla kernel. So IMHO this case can't be tested,
sorry.

Kind regards,
  Marco

> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27 10:42 [PATCH 0/3] USB IMX Chipidea fix gpio vbus control Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42 ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] USB: ehci-hub: let port_power() override the ehci_port_power() Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42   ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Partially Revert "usb: chipidea: host: turn on vbus before add hcd if early vbus on is required" Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42   ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Revert "usb: chipidea: add a flag for turn on vbus early for host" Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 10:42   ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 11:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] USB IMX Chipidea fix gpio vbus control Peter Chen
2020-02-27 11:18   ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 11:35   ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 11:35     ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 12:20     ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 12:20       ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 12:44       ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 12:44         ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-27 13:30         ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 13:30           ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 13:59           ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 13:59             ` Peter Chen
2020-02-27 14:39           ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2020-02-27 14:39             ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-28  2:51             ` Peter Chen
2020-02-28  2:51               ` Peter Chen
2020-02-28  7:48               ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-28  7:48                 ` Marco Felsch
2020-02-28  9:40                 ` Peter Chen
2020-02-28  9:40                   ` Peter Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200227143914.mi3vsltrtyo5sqed@pengutronix.de \
    --to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jun.li@freescale.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.