All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated available
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:23:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319162321.20632-2-s-anna@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319162321.20632-1-s-anna@ti.com>

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

In some cases, like with OMAP remoteproc, we are not creating dedicated
memory pool for the virtio device. Instead, we use the same memory pool
for all shared memories. The current virtio memory pool handling forces
a split between these two, as a separate device is created for it,
causing memory to be allocated from bad location if the dedicated pool
is not available. Fix this by falling back to using the parent device
memory pool if dedicated is not available.

Fixes: 086d08725d34 ("remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool")
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
 - Address Arnaud's concerns about hard-coded memory-region index 0
 - Update the comment around the new code addition
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11422721/

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h             |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index eb817132bc5f..b687715cdf4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -369,6 +369,21 @@ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
 				goto out;
 			}
 		}
+	} else {
+		struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
+
+		/*
+		 * If we don't have dedicated buffer, just attempt to re-assign
+		 * the reserved memory from our parent. A default memory-region
+		 * at index 0 from the parent's memory-regions is assigned for
+		 * the rvdev dev to allocate from, and this can be customized
+		 * by updating the vdevbuf_mem_id in platform drivers if
+		 * desired. Failure is non-critical and the allocations will
+		 * fall back to global pools, so don't check return value
+		 * either.
+		 */
+		of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
+						   rproc->vdevbuf_mem_id);
 	}
 
 	/* Allocate virtio device */
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index ed127b2d35ca..07bd73a6d72a 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
  * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
+ * @vdevbuf_mem_id: default memory-region index for allocating vdev buffers
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -514,6 +515,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	bool auto_boot;
 	struct list_head dump_segments;
 	int nb_vdev;
+	u8 vdevbuf_mem_id;
 	u8 elf_class;
 };
 
-- 
2.23.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated available
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:23:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319162321.20632-2-s-anna@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319162321.20632-1-s-anna@ti.com>

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

In some cases, like with OMAP remoteproc, we are not creating dedicated
memory pool for the virtio device. Instead, we use the same memory pool
for all shared memories. The current virtio memory pool handling forces
a split between these two, as a separate device is created for it,
causing memory to be allocated from bad location if the dedicated pool
is not available. Fix this by falling back to using the parent device
memory pool if dedicated is not available.

Fixes: 086d08725d34 ("remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool")
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
 - Address Arnaud's concerns about hard-coded memory-region index 0
 - Update the comment around the new code addition
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11422721/

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h             |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index eb817132bc5f..b687715cdf4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -369,6 +369,21 @@ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
 				goto out;
 			}
 		}
+	} else {
+		struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
+
+		/*
+		 * If we don't have dedicated buffer, just attempt to re-assign
+		 * the reserved memory from our parent. A default memory-region
+		 * at index 0 from the parent's memory-regions is assigned for
+		 * the rvdev dev to allocate from, and this can be customized
+		 * by updating the vdevbuf_mem_id in platform drivers if
+		 * desired. Failure is non-critical and the allocations will
+		 * fall back to global pools, so don't check return value
+		 * either.
+		 */
+		of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
+						   rproc->vdevbuf_mem_id);
 	}
 
 	/* Allocate virtio device */
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index ed127b2d35ca..07bd73a6d72a 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
  * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
+ * @vdevbuf_mem_id: default memory-region index for allocating vdev buffers
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -514,6 +515,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	bool auto_boot;
 	struct list_head dump_segments;
 	int nb_vdev;
+	u8 vdevbuf_mem_id;
 	u8 elf_class;
 };
 
-- 
2.23.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-19 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 16:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region support Suman Anna
2020-03-19 16:23 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-19 16:23 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2020-03-19 16:23   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated available Suman Anna
2020-03-20  8:39   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-03-20  8:39     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-03-25 20:38   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-25 20:38     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-25 23:39     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-25 23:39       ` Suman Anna
2020-03-27 21:09       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 12:29         ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-07 19:47           ` Suman Anna
2020-04-08  9:42             ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-08 23:36               ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09  9:58                 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-09 13:20                   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-07 19:36         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-19 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: Fix and restore the parenting hierarchy for vdev Suman Anna
2020-03-19 16:23   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region support Suman Anna
2020-04-14 18:43   ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200319162321.20632-2-s-anna@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.