Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mfd: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625

From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	jic23@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de,
	pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mfd: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324081651.GG5477@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323021605.GA2731@labundy.com>

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:24:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Mar 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Lee,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:04:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Lee,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well done Jeff.  Good job.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Applied, thanks.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thank you for your kind words as well as your support in fleshing out this
> > > > > series.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Just to confirm, does your offer to take the remainder (once everything is
> > > > > approved) through immutable branches still stand?
> > > > 
> > > > Depends how quickly you can get the other drivers turned around.
> > > 
> > > With Uwe's approval from Friday, all five drivers are complete. Dmitry and
> > > Jonathan's approvals were given in previous review cycles and were carried
> > > forward with their permission. If anything else is required, please let me
> > > know.
> > 
> > Does Uwe's review mean that Thierry's is not required?
> 
> Sorry about that; I was jumping the gun (thank you Uwe for clarifying).
> The pwm patch still needs an Ack from Thierry before it can be applied.
> 
> I have not received any feedback from Thierry throughout this patch set,
> and I'd like to unblock the remainder if possible. In case Thierry does
> not respond by the time you elect to send your next pull request, would
> you be willing to drop the pwm patch and take the input and iio patches
> through your tree?
> 
> If so, I'll re-send the pwm patch on its own to Thierry during a future
> cycle so that he can take it through his tree at his convenience.

Hopefully we hear fro Thierry.

If not, yes I can apply the set without the PWM patch.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog