All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [tracing] cd8f62b481: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:21:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401102112.35036490@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401230700.d9ddb42b3459dca98144b55c@kernel.org>

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 23:07:00 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:12:56 +0800
> kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> > 
> > commit: cd8f62b481530fafbeacee0d3283b60bcf42d854 ("[PATCH 02/12 v2] tracing: Save off entry when peeking at next entry")
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/ring-buffer-tracing-Remove-disabling-of-ring-buffer-while-reading-trace-file/20200320-073240
> >   
> 
> Hmm, this seems that we can not call kmalloc() in ftrace_dump().
> Maybe we can fix it by
> - Use GFP_ATOMIC.
>  or
> - Do not use iter->temp if it is NULL. (it is safe since ftrace_dump() stops tracing)
> 
> What would you think?
> 

Thanks for the reminder, I knew there was something that I had to deal with
and forgot to mark this report!

I already looked at it, and yes, this is an issue, but for PREEMPT_RT even
GFP_ATOMIC will fail. As it's not critical to record it, we can just check
for in atomic and not bother with the allocation.

-- Steve

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 6519b7afc499..7f1466253ca8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3487,6 +3487,14 @@ struct trace_entry *trace_find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter,
 	 */
 	if (iter->ent && iter->ent != iter->temp) {
 		if (!iter->temp || iter->temp_size < iter->ent_size) {
+			/*
+			 * This function is only used to add markers between
+			 * events that are far apart (see trace_print_lat_context()),
+			 * but if this is called in an atomic context (like NMIs)
+			 * we can't call kmalloc(), thus just return NULL.
+			 */
+			if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())
+				return NULL;
 			kfree(iter->temp);
 			iter->temp = kmalloc(iter->ent_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!iter->temp)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [tracing] cd8f62b481: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:21:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401102112.35036490@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401230700.d9ddb42b3459dca98144b55c@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1918 bytes --]

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 23:07:00 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:12:56 +0800
> kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> > 
> > commit: cd8f62b481530fafbeacee0d3283b60bcf42d854 ("[PATCH 02/12 v2] tracing: Save off entry when peeking at next entry")
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/ring-buffer-tracing-Remove-disabling-of-ring-buffer-while-reading-trace-file/20200320-073240
> >   
> 
> Hmm, this seems that we can not call kmalloc() in ftrace_dump().
> Maybe we can fix it by
> - Use GFP_ATOMIC.
>  or
> - Do not use iter->temp if it is NULL. (it is safe since ftrace_dump() stops tracing)
> 
> What would you think?
> 

Thanks for the reminder, I knew there was something that I had to deal with
and forgot to mark this report!

I already looked at it, and yes, this is an issue, but for PREEMPT_RT even
GFP_ATOMIC will fail. As it's not critical to record it, we can just check
for in atomic and not bother with the allocation.

-- Steve

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 6519b7afc499..7f1466253ca8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3487,6 +3487,14 @@ struct trace_entry *trace_find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter,
 	 */
 	if (iter->ent && iter->ent != iter->temp) {
 		if (!iter->temp || iter->temp_size < iter->ent_size) {
+			/*
+			 * This function is only used to add markers between
+			 * events that are far apart (see trace_print_lat_context()),
+			 * but if this is called in an atomic context (like NMIs)
+			 * we can't call kmalloc(), thus just return NULL.
+			 */
+			if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())
+				return NULL;
 			kfree(iter->temp);
 			iter->temp = kmalloc(iter->ent_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!iter->temp)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-01 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 23:22 [PATCH 00/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Remove disabling of ring buffer while reading trace file Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 01/12 v2] selftest/ftrace: Fix function trigger test to handle trace not disabling the tracer Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 02/12 v2] tracing: Save off entry when peeking at next entry Steven Rostedt
2020-03-20  2:57   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-26  9:12   ` [tracing] cd8f62b481: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h kernel test robot
2020-03-26  9:12     ` kernel test robot
2020-04-01 14:07     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-01 14:07       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-01 14:21       ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-04-01 14:21         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 15:04         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 15:04           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02  7:19           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-02  7:19             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-02 18:14             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02 18:14               ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-03  6:47               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-03  6:47                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-03 13:16                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-03 13:16                   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 03/12 v2] ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_empty() not depend on tracing stopped Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 04/12 v2] ring-buffer: Rename ring_buffer_read() to read_buffer_iter_advance() Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 05/12 v2] ring-buffer: Add page_stamp to iterator for synchronization Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 06/12 v2] ring-buffer: Have rb_iter_head_event() handle concurrent writer Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 07/12 v2] ring-buffer: Do not die if rb_iter_peek() fails more than thrice Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 08/12 v2] ring-buffer: Optimize rb_iter_head_event() Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 09/12 v2] ring-buffer: Do not disable recording when there is an iterator Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 10/12 v2] tracing: Do not disable tracing when reading the trace file Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 11/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Have iterator acknowledge dropped events Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 12/12 v2] tracing: Have the document reflect that the trace file keeps tracing enabled Steven Rostedt
2020-03-21 19:13 ` [PATCH 00/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Remove disabling of ring buffer while reading trace file David Laight
2020-03-22 18:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27  1:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27 10:07     ` David Laight
2020-03-27 14:30       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27 14:56         ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200401102112.35036490@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.