From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 1/2] x86,module: Detect VMX modules and disable Split-Lock-Detect
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:51:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402185148.GL20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200402175127.GJ13879@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:51:28AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Aside of that I'm still against the attempt of proliferating crap,
> > i.e. disabling it because the host is triggering it and then exposing it
> > to guests. The above does not change my mind in any way. This proposal
> > is still wrong.
>
> Eh, I still think the "off in host, on in guest" is a legit scenario for
> debug/development/testing, but I agree that the added complexity doesn't
> justify the minimal benefits versus sld_warn.
Off in host on in guest seems utterly insane to me. Why do you care
about that?
That's like building a bridge with rotten timber.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-02 12:32 [patch 0/2] x86: Prevent Split-Lock-Detection wreckage on VMX hypervisors Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 12:32 ` [patch 1/2] x86,module: Detect VMX modules and disable Split-Lock-Detect Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 15:23 ` [patch v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 16:20 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-02 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 16:39 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-02 16:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-02 17:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 17:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-04-02 20:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 8:09 ` David Laight
2020-04-03 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 23:42 ` [patch " Rasmus Villemoes
2020-04-03 14:35 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-03 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:16 ` David Laight
2020-04-03 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:48 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-03 17:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 18:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-03 20:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-03 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-03 11:29 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-03 11:29 ` [patch 1/2] x86, module: " kbuild test robot
2020-04-03 14:43 ` [patch 1/2] x86,module: " kbuild test robot
2020-04-03 14:43 ` [patch 1/2] x86, module: " kbuild test robot
2020-04-03 16:36 ` [patch 1/2] x86,module: " Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 18:35 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-06 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 18:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02 12:33 ` [patch 2/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Prevent split lock detection induced #AC wreckage Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 15:44 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-02 16:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 15:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: KVM: VMX: Add basic split-lock #AC handling Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/split_lock: Refactor and export handle_user_split_lock() for KVM Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 17:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 17:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 19:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-10 4:39 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-10 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: VMX: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC in guest Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 17:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 17:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 20:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-04-02 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 20:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-02 22:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 22:40 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-02 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02 23:16 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2020-04-02 23:18 ` Jim Mattson
2020-04-03 12:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-10 10:23 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: KVM: VMX: Add basic split-lock #AC handling Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-10 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 13:43 ` [patch 0/2] x86: Prevent Split-Lock-Detection wreckage on VMX hypervisors Kenneth R. Crudup
2020-04-02 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 14:41 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2020-04-02 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 14:53 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2020-04-02 14:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-02 14:47 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-02 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402185148.GL20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=kenny@panix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.