From: Matthias Blankertz <matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, "Kuninori Morimoto" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rsnd: multi-SSI setup fixes Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:30:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200417153017.1744454-1-matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com> (raw) Fix rsnd_dai_call() operations being performed twice for the master SSI in multi-SSI setups, and fix the rsnd_ssi_stop operation for multi-SSI setups. The only visible effect of these issues was some "status check failed" spam when the rsnd_ssi_stop was called, but overall the code is cleaner now, and some questionable writes to the SSICR register which did not lead to any observable misbehaviour but were contrary to the datasheet are fixed. Mark: The first patch kind of reverts my "ASoC: rsnd: Fix parent SSI start/stop in multi-SSI mode" from a few days ago and achieves the same effect in a simpler fashion, if you would prefer a clean patch series based on v5.6 drop me a note. Greetings, Matthias Matthias Blankertz (2): ASoC: rsnd: Don't treat master SSI in multi SSI setup as parent ASoC: rsnd: Fix "status check failed" spam for multi-SSI sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) base-commit: 15a5760cb8b6d5c1ebbf1d2e1f0b77380ab68a82 -- 2.26.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthias Blankertz <matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rsnd: multi-SSI setup fixes Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:30:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200417153017.1744454-1-matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com> (raw) Fix rsnd_dai_call() operations being performed twice for the master SSI in multi-SSI setups, and fix the rsnd_ssi_stop operation for multi-SSI setups. The only visible effect of these issues was some "status check failed" spam when the rsnd_ssi_stop was called, but overall the code is cleaner now, and some questionable writes to the SSICR register which did not lead to any observable misbehaviour but were contrary to the datasheet are fixed. Mark: The first patch kind of reverts my "ASoC: rsnd: Fix parent SSI start/stop in multi-SSI mode" from a few days ago and achieves the same effect in a simpler fashion, if you would prefer a clean patch series based on v5.6 drop me a note. Greetings, Matthias Matthias Blankertz (2): ASoC: rsnd: Don't treat master SSI in multi SSI setup as parent ASoC: rsnd: Fix "status check failed" spam for multi-SSI sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) base-commit: 15a5760cb8b6d5c1ebbf1d2e1f0b77380ab68a82 -- 2.26.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 15:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-17 15:30 Matthias Blankertz [this message] 2020-04-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rsnd: multi-SSI setup fixes Matthias Blankertz 2020-04-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rsnd: Don't treat master SSI in multi SSI setup as parent Matthias Blankertz 2020-04-17 15:30 ` Matthias Blankertz 2020-04-17 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: rsnd: Fix "status check failed" spam for multi-SSI Matthias Blankertz 2020-04-17 15:30 ` Matthias Blankertz 2020-04-19 23:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rsnd: multi-SSI setup fixes Kuninori Morimoto 2020-04-19 23:38 ` Kuninori Morimoto 2020-04-20 13:37 ` Mark Brown 2020-04-20 13:37 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200417153017.1744454-1-matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com \ --to=matthias.blankertz@cetitec.com \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=perex@perex.cz \ --cc=tiwai@suse.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.