From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
paulus@samba.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, allison@lohutok.net,
kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
bhsharma@redhat.com, mbrugger@suse.com, hsinyi@chromium.org,
tao.li@vivo.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass.
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote:
> Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer
> from the reserved memory section of a device tree.
But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them.
> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most
code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It
doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user.
> include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, tao.li@vivo.com,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
frowand.list@gmail.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, serge@hallyn.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
hsinyi@chromium.org, tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, mbrugger@suse.com,
balajib@linux.microsoft.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass.
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote:
> Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer
> from the reserved memory section of a device tree.
But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them.
> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most
code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It
doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user.
> include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
bhsharma@redhat.com, tao.li@vivo.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
paulus@samba.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
nramas@linux.microsoft.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, serge@hallyn.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
hsinyi@chromium.org, tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr,
mbrugger@suse.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass.
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote:
> Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer
> from the reserved memory section of a device tree.
But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them.
> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most
code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It
doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user.
> include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 20:38 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Add support for using reserved memory for ima buffer pass Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree " Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-05 13:50 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-05 14:44 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-12 23:09 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-05-12 23:09 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12 23:09 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-18 20:34 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-18 20:34 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-18 20:34 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Add support for ima buffer pass using reserved memory arm64 Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-04 20:38 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-05 9:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Add support for using reserved memory for ima buffer pass Mark Rutland
2020-05-05 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-05 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-07 5:50 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-07 5:50 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-07 5:50 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-12 23:05 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12 23:05 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12 23:05 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-18 20:16 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-18 20:16 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-18 20:16 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-23 4:08 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-05-23 4:08 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-05-23 4:08 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-06-01 4:05 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-06-01 4:05 ` Prakhar Srivastava
2020-06-01 4:05 ` Prakhar Srivastava
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-01 18:15 Prakhar Srivastava
2020-05-01 18:15 ` [RFC]{PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree " Prakhar Srivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512230954.GB2654@bogus \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=balajib@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prsriva@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=tao.li@vivo.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.