From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:55:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200601175552.22286-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601175552.22286-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the memory
ranges since there is no correlation between them.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index f45b8d597da0..a80733fb08e7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
return 0;
}
-static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
{
- struct device *parent, *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
- struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ struct device *parent, *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np;
struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mems;
struct stm32_rproc_mem_ranges *mem_range;
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
- return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(rproc);
+ return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
}
static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:55:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200601175552.22286-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601175552.22286-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the memory
ranges since there is no correlation between them.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index f45b8d597da0..a80733fb08e7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
return 0;
}
-static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
{
- struct device *parent, *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
- struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ struct device *parent, *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np;
struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mems;
struct stm32_rproc_mem_ranges *mem_range;
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
- return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(rproc);
+ return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
}
static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 17:55 [PATCH v4 00/11] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for attaching to M4 Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation " Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-22 18:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] remoteproc: Make function rproc_resource_cleanup() public Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] remoteproc: stm32: Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw() Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly handle the resource table when attaching Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new attach() operation Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop() Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-01 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200601175552.22286-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.