From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618144627.114057-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
this series first cleans up the exec code and then adds proper
kernel_execveat and kernel_wait callers instead of relying on the fact
that the early init code and kernel threads implicitly run with
the address limit set to KERNEL_DS.
Note that the cleanup removes the compat execve(at) handlers entirely, as
we can handle the compat difference very nicely in a unified codebase.
x32 needs two hacky #defines for that for now, although those can go
away if the x32 syscall rework from Brian gets merged.
Changes since v1:
- remove a pointless ifdef from get_user_arg_ptr
- remove the need for a compat syscall handler for x32
Diffstat:
arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 4
arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c | 7
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
fs/exec.c | 248 ++++++++-------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 10
include/linux/compat.h | 7
include/linux/sched/task.h | 1
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
init/main.c | 5
kernel/exit.c | 16 +
kernel/umh.c | 43 ---
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
22 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:46:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618144627.114057-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615130032.931285-1-hch@lst.de>
Hi all,
this series first cleans up the exec code and then adds proper
kernel_execveat and kernel_wait callers instead of relying on the fact
that the early init code and kernel threads implicitly run with
the address limit set to KERNEL_DS.
Note that the cleanup removes the compat execve(at) handlers entirely, as
we can handle the compat difference very nicely in a unified codebase.
x32 needs two hacky #defines for that for now, although those can go
away if the x32 syscall rework from Brian gets merged.
Changes since v1:
- remove a pointless ifdef from get_user_arg_ptr
- remove the need for a compat syscall handler for x32
Diffstat:
arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 4
arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c | 7
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
fs/exec.c | 248 ++++++++-------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 10
include/linux/compat.h | 7
include/linux/sched/task.h | 1
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
init/main.c | 5
kernel/exit.c | 16 +
kernel/umh.c | 43 ---
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
22 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618144627.114057-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
this series first cleans up the exec code and then adds proper
kernel_execveat and kernel_wait callers instead of relying on the fact
that the early init code and kernel threads implicitly run with
the address limit set to KERNEL_DS.
Note that the cleanup removes the compat execve(at) handlers entirely, as
we can handle the compat difference very nicely in a unified codebase.
x32 needs two hacky #defines for that for now, although those can go
away if the x32 syscall rework from Brian gets merged.
Changes since v1:
- remove a pointless ifdef from get_user_arg_ptr
- remove the need for a compat syscall handler for x32
Diffstat:
arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 4
arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c | 7
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
fs/exec.c | 248 ++++++++-------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 10
include/linux/compat.h | 7
include/linux/sched/task.h | 1
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
init/main.c | 5
kernel/exit.c | 16 +
kernel/umh.c | 43 ---
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
22 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618144627.114057-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
this series first cleans up the exec code and then adds proper
kernel_execveat and kernel_wait callers instead of relying on the fact
that the early init code and kernel threads implicitly run with
the address limit set to KERNEL_DS.
Note that the cleanup removes the compat execve(at) handlers entirely, as
we can handle the compat difference very nicely in a unified codebase.
x32 needs two hacky #defines for that for now, although those can go
away if the x32 syscall rework from Brian gets merged.
Changes since v1:
- remove a pointless ifdef from get_user_arg_ptr
- remove the need for a compat syscall handler for x32
Diffstat:
arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 4
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 4
arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c | 7
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 4
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
fs/exec.c | 248 ++++++++-------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 10
include/linux/compat.h | 7
include/linux/sched/task.h | 1
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
init/main.c | 5
kernel/exit.c | 16 +
kernel/umh.c | 43 ---
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 4
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 4
22 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 14:46 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-06-18 14:46 ` properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] exec: cleanup the execve wrappers Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] exec: cleanup the count() function Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] exec: split prepare_arg_pages Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] exec: add a kernel_execveat helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-19 21:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-20 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-20 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-20 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-20 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-20 17:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-20 17:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-20 17:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-15 13:00 properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] exec: cleanup the execve wrappers Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 15:33 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 15:33 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 15:33 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 15:33 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 15:33 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 14:48 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 14:48 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 14:48 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 14:48 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 19:45 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 19:45 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 19:45 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 19:45 ` Brian Gerst
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] exec: cleanup the count() function Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] exec: split prepare_arg_pages Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] exec: add a kernel_execveat helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] kernel: add a kernel_wait helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 13:42 ` properly support exec and wait with kernel pointers Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-15 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618144627.114057-1-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.