All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
	mchehab@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	louis.kuo@mediatek.com, shengnan.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618184554.GA68039@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616125531.31671-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:55:31PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor,
> providing control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  12 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 553 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 567 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
[snip]
> +static int dw9768_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dw9768 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dw9768), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dw9768)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9768->sd, client, &dw9768_ops);
> +
> +	dw9768->aac_mode = DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->aac_timing = DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->clock_presc = DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT;
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC mode select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-mode",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_mode);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of clock pre-scale select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,clock-presc",
> +				 &dw9768->clock_presc);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC Timing */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-timing",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_timing);
> +
> +	dw9768->move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +						      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +						      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

nit: Could we make the function return the value in us already? One would
expect the function to return the value in a standard unit, so this
division by 100 here is confusing.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names); i++)
> +		dw9768->supplies[i].supply = dw9768_supply_names[i];
> +
> +	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names),
> +				      dw9768->supplies);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Initialize controls */
> +	ret = dw9768_init_controls(dw9768);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	dw9768->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> +	dw9768->sd.internal_ops = &dw9768_int_ops;
> +
> +	ret = media_entity_pads_init(&dw9768->sd.entity, 0, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	dw9768->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_LENS;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto err_power_off;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_power_off:
> +	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))

We just disabled runtime PM in the line above, so this check would be
always true. Need to call pm_runtime_disable() after this if.

> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev))

Oops, I just realized that my suggestion about the function to use here
was incorrect. pm_runtime_status_suspended() should be the correct function
here. Sorry for the confusion.

This is because we only have 2 cases here:
 - runtime PM compiled out - the stubs function is used, which returns
   false, so the condition is true,
 - runtime PM compiled in - we enabled runtime PM in probe, so here we
   don't need to consider the enable state.

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618184554.GA68039@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616125531.31671-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:55:31PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor,
> providing control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  12 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 553 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 567 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
[snip]
> +static int dw9768_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dw9768 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dw9768), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dw9768)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9768->sd, client, &dw9768_ops);
> +
> +	dw9768->aac_mode = DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->aac_timing = DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->clock_presc = DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT;
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC mode select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-mode",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_mode);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of clock pre-scale select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,clock-presc",
> +				 &dw9768->clock_presc);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC Timing */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-timing",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_timing);
> +
> +	dw9768->move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +						      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +						      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

nit: Could we make the function return the value in us already? One would
expect the function to return the value in a standard unit, so this
division by 100 here is confusing.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names); i++)
> +		dw9768->supplies[i].supply = dw9768_supply_names[i];
> +
> +	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names),
> +				      dw9768->supplies);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Initialize controls */
> +	ret = dw9768_init_controls(dw9768);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	dw9768->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> +	dw9768->sd.internal_ops = &dw9768_int_ops;
> +
> +	ret = media_entity_pads_init(&dw9768->sd.entity, 0, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	dw9768->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_LENS;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto err_power_off;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_power_off:
> +	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))

We just disabled runtime PM in the line above, so this check would be
always true. Need to call pm_runtime_disable() after this if.

> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev))

Oops, I just realized that my suggestion about the function to use here
was incorrect. pm_runtime_status_suspended() should be the correct function
here. Sorry for the confusion.

This is because we only have 2 cases here:
 - runtime PM compiled out - the stubs function is used, which returns
   false, so the condition is true,
 - runtime PM compiled in - we enabled runtime PM in probe, so here we
   don't need to consider the enable state.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618184554.GA68039@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616125531.31671-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:55:31PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor,
> providing control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  12 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 553 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 567 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
[snip]
> +static int dw9768_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dw9768 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dw9768), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dw9768)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9768->sd, client, &dw9768_ops);
> +
> +	dw9768->aac_mode = DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->aac_timing = DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT;
> +	dw9768->clock_presc = DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT;
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC mode select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-mode",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_mode);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of clock pre-scale select */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,clock-presc",
> +				 &dw9768->clock_presc);
> +
> +	/* Optional indication of AAC Timing */
> +	fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), "dongwoon,aac-timing",
> +				 &dw9768->aac_timing);
> +
> +	dw9768->move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +						      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +						      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

nit: Could we make the function return the value in us already? One would
expect the function to return the value in a standard unit, so this
division by 100 here is confusing.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names); i++)
> +		dw9768->supplies[i].supply = dw9768_supply_names[i];
> +
> +	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(dw9768_supply_names),
> +				      dw9768->supplies);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Initialize controls */
> +	ret = dw9768_init_controls(dw9768);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	/* Initialize subdev */
> +	dw9768->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> +	dw9768->sd.internal_ops = &dw9768_int_ops;
> +
> +	ret = media_entity_pads_init(&dw9768->sd.entity, 0, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_free_handler;
> +
> +	dw9768->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_LENS;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto err_power_off;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_power_off:
> +	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))

We just disabled runtime PM in the line above, so this check would be
always true. Need to call pm_runtime_disable() after this if.

> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev))

Oops, I just realized that my suggestion about the function to use here
was incorrect. pm_runtime_status_suspended() should be the correct function
here. Sorry for the confusion.

This is because we only have 2 cases here:
 - runtime PM compiled out - the stubs function is used, which returns
   false, so the condition is true,
 - runtime PM compiled in - we enabled runtime PM in probe, so here we
   don't need to consider the enable state.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-18 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 12:55 [PATCH V8 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55 ` [PATCH V8 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document DW9768 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55 ` [PATCH V8 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-16 12:55   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-18 18:45   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2020-06-18 18:45     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-18 18:45     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-20  6:58     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-20  6:58       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-20  6:58       ` Dongchun Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200618184554.GA68039@chromium.org \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.