Re: [PATCH v1] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management

From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:31:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200722200134.GA4310@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159542550175.19884.5724047291778558359.b4-ty@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:45:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 21:27:15 +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > Drivers using legacy PM have to manage PCI states and device's PM states
> > themselves. They also need to take care of configuration registers.
> > 
> > With improved and powerful support of generic PM, PCI Core takes care of
> > above mentioned, device-independent, jobs.
> > 
> > This driver makes use of PCI helper functions like
> > pci_save/restore_state(), pci_enable/disable_device(), pci_enable_wake()
> > and pci_set_power_state() to do required operations. In generic mode, they
> > are no longer needed.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/1] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management
>       commit: f185bcc779808df5d31bc332b79b5f1455ee910b
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
Thanks,
--Vaibhav Gupta
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark