All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop runtime-pm assert from vgpu io accessors
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:25:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811092532.13753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200811030209.21058-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>

The "mmio" writes into vgpu registers are simple memory traps from the
guest into the host. We do not need to assert in the guest that the
device is awake for the io as we do not write to the device itself.

However, over time we have refactored all the mmio accessors with the
result that the vgpu reuses the gen2 accessors and so inherits the
assert for runtime-pm of the native device. The assert though has
actually been there since commit 3be0bf5acca6 ("drm/i915: Create vGPU
specific MMIO operations to reduce traps").

References: 3be0bf5acca6 ("drm/i915: Create vGPU specific MMIO operations to reduce traps")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index f5edee17902a..6d3310794d0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1209,6 +1209,18 @@ unclaimed_reg_debug(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 		spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
 }
 
+#define __vgpu_read(x) \
+static u##x \
+vgpu_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
+	u##x val = __raw_uncore_read##x(uncore, reg); \
+	trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
+	return val; \
+}
+__vgpu_read(8)
+__vgpu_read(16)
+__vgpu_read(32)
+__vgpu_read(64)
+
 #define GEN2_READ_HEADER(x) \
 	u##x val = 0; \
 	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(uncore->rpm);
@@ -1414,6 +1426,16 @@ __gen_reg_write_funcs(gen8);
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_HEADER
 
+#define __vgpu_write(x) \
+static void \
+vgpu_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+	trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
+	__raw_uncore_write##x(uncore, reg, val); \
+}
+__vgpu_write(8)
+__vgpu_write(16)
+__vgpu_write(32)
+
 #define ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x) \
 do { \
 	(uncore)->funcs.mmio_writeb = x##_write8; \
@@ -1735,7 +1757,10 @@ static void uncore_raw_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 {
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore));
 
-	if (IS_GEN(uncore->i915, 5)) {
+	if (intel_vgpu_active(uncore->i915)) {
+		ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, vgpu);
+		ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, vgpu);
+	} else if (IS_GEN(uncore->i915, 5)) {
 		ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen5);
 		ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen5);
 	} else {
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-11  3:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt:fix raw-wakeref not held calltrace in vGPU Yan Zhao
2020-08-11  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for " Patchwork
2020-08-11  4:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-11  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-11  8:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-08-11  8:18   ` Yan Zhao
2020-08-11  8:39   ` Zhenyu Wang
2020-08-11  9:25 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-08-12  2:06   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop runtime-pm assert from vgpu io accessors Zhenyu Wang
2020-08-19  8:32     ` Zhenyu Wang
2020-10-19  9:37       ` Zhenyu Wang
2020-10-20  9:41         ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-11 10:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gt:fix raw-wakeref not held calltrace in vGPU (rev2) Patchwork
2020-08-11 10:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-11 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811092532.13753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.