From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916204359.GB29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjsMycgMHJrCmeetR3r+K5bpSRtmVWfd8iaoQCYd_VYAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:32:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > All fair, but some of us need to write code that must handle being
> > invoked from a wide variety of contexts.
>
> Note that I think that core functionality is different from random drivers.
>
> Of course core code can (and will) look at things like
>
> if (in_interrupt())
> .. schedule work asynchronously ..
>
> because core code ends up being called from odd places, and code like
> that is expected to have understanding of the rules it plays with.
>
> But something like RCU is a very different beast from some "walk the
> scatter-gather list" code.
>
> RCU does its work in the background, and works with lots of different
> things. And it's so core and used everywhere that it knows about these
> things. I mean, we literally have special code explicitly to let RCU
> know "we entered kernel context now".
>
> But something like a driver list walking thing should not be doing
> different things behind peoples back depending on whether they hold
> spinlocks or not. It should either just work regardless, or there
> should be a flag (or special interface) for the "you're being called
> in a crtitical region".
>
> Because dynamically changing behavior really is very confusing.
Whew! I feel much better now. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916204359.GB29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjsMycgMHJrCmeetR3r+K5bpSRtmVWfd8iaoQCYd_VYAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:32:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > All fair, but some of us need to write code that must handle being
> > invoked from a wide variety of contexts.
>
> Note that I think that core functionality is different from random drivers.
>
> Of course core code can (and will) look at things like
>
> if (in_interrupt())
> .. schedule work asynchronously ..
>
> because core code ends up being called from odd places, and code like
> that is expected to have understanding of the rules it plays with.
>
> But something like RCU is a very different beast from some "walk the
> scatter-gather list" code.
>
> RCU does its work in the background, and works with lots of different
> things. And it's so core and used everywhere that it knows about these
> things. I mean, we literally have special code explicitly to let RCU
> know "we entered kernel context now".
>
> But something like a driver list walking thing should not be doing
> different things behind peoples back depending on whether they hold
> spinlocks or not. It should either just work regardless, or there
> should be a flag (or special interface) for the "you're being called
> in a crtitical region".
>
> Because dynamically changing behavior really is very confusing.
Whew! I feel much better now. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916204359.GB29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjsMycgMHJrCmeetR3r+K5bpSRtmVWfd8iaoQCYd_VYAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:32:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > All fair, but some of us need to write code that must handle being
> > invoked from a wide variety of contexts.
>
> Note that I think that core functionality is different from random drivers.
>
> Of course core code can (and will) look at things like
>
> if (in_interrupt())
> .. schedule work asynchronously ..
>
> because core code ends up being called from odd places, and code like
> that is expected to have understanding of the rules it plays with.
>
> But something like RCU is a very different beast from some "walk the
> scatter-gather list" code.
>
> RCU does its work in the background, and works with lots of different
> things. And it's so core and used everywhere that it knows about these
> things. I mean, we literally have special code explicitly to let RCU
> know "we entered kernel context now".
>
> But something like a driver list walking thing should not be doing
> different things behind peoples back depending on whether they hold
> spinlocks or not. It should either just work regardless, or there
> should be a flag (or special interface) for the "you're being called
> in a crtitical region".
>
> Because dynamically changing behavior really is very confusing.
Whew! I feel much better now. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
l
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916204359.GB29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjsMycgMHJrCmeetR3r+K5bpSRtmVWfd8iaoQCYd_VYAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:32:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > All fair, but some of us need to write code that must handle being
> > invoked from a wide variety of contexts.
>
> Note that I think that core functionality is different from random drivers.
>
> Of course core code can (and will) look at things like
>
> if (in_interrupt())
> .. schedule work asynchronously ..
>
> because core code ends up being called from odd places, and code like
> that is expected to have understanding of the rules it plays with.
>
> But something like RCU is a very different beast from some "walk the
> scatter-gather list" code.
>
> RCU does its work in the background, and works with lots of different
> things. And it's so core and used everywhere that it knows about these
> things. I mean, we literally have special code explicitly to let RCU
> know "we entered kernel context now".
>
> But something like a driver list walking thing should not be doing
> different things behind peoples back depending on whether they hold
> spinlocks or not. It should either just work regardless, or there
> should be a flag (or special interface) for the "you're being called
> in a crtitical region".
>
> Because dynamically changing behavior really is very confusing.
Whew! I feel much better now. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 282+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 20:42 [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 02/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 03/13] preempt: Clenaup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 04/13] lockdep: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 05/13] mm/pagemap: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 0:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15 0:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15 2:40 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15 5:28 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 06/13] locking/bitspinlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 07/13] uaccess: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 08/13] sched: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 09/13] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 10/13] xtensa: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 11/13] drm/i915: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 12/13] rcutorture: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 13/13] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_COUNT from Kconfig Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:54 ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 3:21 ` [PATCH] crypto: lib/chacha20poly1305 - Set SG_MITER_ATOMIC unconditionally Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 3:21 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 3:21 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 3:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 3:21 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 3:30 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:40 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 6:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 7:05 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 7:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 10:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:05 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 10:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:10 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 19:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 7:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:20 ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 6:22 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:22 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:22 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:22 ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 6:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 6:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 6:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 6:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 6:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 7:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 7:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 8:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 7:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 7:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 7:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 7:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 7:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-09-16 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 6:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17 6:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17 6:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17 6:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17 6:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-16 20:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 21:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 22:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 7:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 9:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 9:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 9:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 9:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 9:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-16 19:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-14 22:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916204359.GB29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.