Re: [PATCH] drm: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY from atomic_commit

From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY from atomic_commit
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:31:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923103137.GD6112@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922181834.2913552-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:18:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
> reconfiguring global resources).
> 
> But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
> which can lead to spurious EBUSY calls, both:
> - when that other CRTC is currently busy doing a page_flip the
>   ALLOW_MODESET commit can fail with an EBUSY
> - on the other CRTC a normal atomic flip can fail with EBUSY because
>   of the additional commit inserted by the kernel without userspace's
>   knowledge
> 
> For blocking commits this isn't a problem, because everyone else will
> just block until all the CRTC are reconfigured. Only thing userspace
> can notice is the dropped frames without any reason for why frames got
> dropped.
> 
> Consensus is that we need new uapi to handle this properly, but no one
> has any idea what exactly the new uapi should look like. Since this
> has been shipping for years already compositors need to deal no matter
> what, so as a first step just try to enforce this across drivers
> better with some checks.
> 
> v2: Add comments and a WARN_ON to enforce this only when allowed - we
> don't want to silently convert page flips into blocking plane updates
> just because the driver is buggy.
> 
> v3: Fix inverted WARN_ON (Pekka).
> 
> v4: Drop the uapi changes, only add a WARN_ON for now to enforce some
> rules for drivers.
> 
> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/182281.html
> Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/issues/24#note_9568
> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
> Cc: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 58527f151984..ef106e7153a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_state_free);
>   * needed. It will also grab the relevant CRTC lock to make sure that the state
>   * is consistent.
>   *
> + * WARNING: Drivers may only add new CRTC states to a @state if
> + * drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset is set, or if it's a driver-internal commit
> + * not created by userspace through an IOCTL call.
> + *
>   * Returns:
>   *
>   * Either the allocated state or the error code encoded into the pointer. When
> @@ -1262,10 +1266,15 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>  	struct drm_connector *conn;
>  	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> +	unsigned requested_crtc = 0;
> +	unsigned affected_crtc = 0;
>  	int i, ret = 0;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
>  
> +	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
> +		requested_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
> +
>  	for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
>  		ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
>  		if (ret) {
> @@ -1313,6 +1322,24 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)

Inconsistent old vs. new.

> +		affected_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * For commits that allow modesets drivers can add other CRTCs to the
> +	 * atomic commit, e.g. when they need to reallocate global resources.
> +	 * This can cause spurious EBUSY, which robs compositors of a very
> +	 * effective sanity check for their drawing loop. Therefor only allow
> +	 * this for modeset commits.
> +	 *
> +	 * FIXME: Should add affected_crtc mask to the ATOMIC IOCTL as an output
> +	 * so compositors know what's going on.
> +	 */
> +	if (affected_crtc != requested_crtc) {
> +		/* adding other CRTC is only allowed for modeset commits */
> +		WARN_ON(!state->allow_modeset);
> +	}

I think this means pretty much all non-pageflip commits will
have to have allow_modeset==true on i915 or else we just can't
guarantee that we can anything (due to sagv and/or cdclk mainly).

Also a bit baffled that CI didn't hit this. I think it should be
totally possible to hit this now. To avoid that I guess we'd just
need to make intel_atomic_serialize_global_state() fail if it
has to add any new crtcs when allow_modeset==false. Hopefully
there aren't many other places that add crtcs to the state
without forcing a modeset on them.

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);
> -- 
> 2.28.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel