All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923151852.2952812-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923105737.2943649-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
reconfiguring global resources).

But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
which can lead to spurious EBUSY calls, both:
- when that other CRTC is currently busy doing a page_flip the
  ALLOW_MODESET commit can fail with an EBUSY
- on the other CRTC a normal atomic flip can fail with EBUSY because
  of the additional commit inserted by the kernel without userspace's
  knowledge

For blocking commits this isn't a problem, because everyone else will
just block until all the CRTC are reconfigured. Only thing userspace
can notice is the dropped frames without any reason for why frames got
dropped.

Consensus is that we need new uapi to handle this properly, but no one
has any idea what exactly the new uapi should look like. Since this
has been shipping for years already compositors need to deal no matter
what, so as a first step just try to enforce this across drivers
better with some checks.

v2: Add comments and a WARN_ON to enforce this only when allowed - we
don't want to silently convert page flips into blocking plane updates
just because the driver is buggy.

v3: Fix inverted WARN_ON (Pekka).

v4: Drop the uapi changes, only add a WARN_ON for now to enforce some
rules for drivers.

v5: Make the WARNING more informative (Daniel)

v6: Add unconditional debug output for compositor hackers to figure
out what's going on when they get an EBUSY (Daniel)

References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/182281.html
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/issues/24#note_9568
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
index 58527f151984..f1a912e80846 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
@@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_state_free);
  * needed. It will also grab the relevant CRTC lock to make sure that the state
  * is consistent.
  *
+ * WARNING: Drivers may only add new CRTC states to a @state if
+ * drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset is set, or if it's a driver-internal commit
+ * not created by userspace through an IOCTL call.
+ *
  * Returns:
  *
  * Either the allocated state or the error code encoded into the pointer. When
@@ -1262,10 +1266,15 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
 	struct drm_connector *conn;
 	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
+	unsigned requested_crtc = 0;
+	unsigned affected_crtc = 0;
 	int i, ret = 0;
 
 	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
 
+	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
+		requested_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
+
 	for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
 		ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
 		if (ret) {
@@ -1313,6 +1322,26 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 		}
 	}
 
+	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
+		affected_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
+
+	/*
+	 * For commits that allow modesets drivers can add other CRTCs to the
+	 * atomic commit, e.g. when they need to reallocate global resources.
+	 * This can cause spurious EBUSY, which robs compositors of a very
+	 * effective sanity check for their drawing loop. Therefor only allow
+	 * drivers to add unrelated CRTC states for modeset commits.
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: Should add affected_crtc mask to the ATOMIC IOCTL as an output
+	 * so compositors know what's going on.
+	 */
+	if (affected_crtc != requested_crtc) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("driver added CRTC to commit: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
+				 requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
+		WARN(!state->allow_modeset, "adding CRTC not allowed without modesets: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
+		     requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923151852.2952812-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923105737.2943649-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
reconfiguring global resources).

But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
which can lead to spurious EBUSY calls, both:
- when that other CRTC is currently busy doing a page_flip the
  ALLOW_MODESET commit can fail with an EBUSY
- on the other CRTC a normal atomic flip can fail with EBUSY because
  of the additional commit inserted by the kernel without userspace's
  knowledge

For blocking commits this isn't a problem, because everyone else will
just block until all the CRTC are reconfigured. Only thing userspace
can notice is the dropped frames without any reason for why frames got
dropped.

Consensus is that we need new uapi to handle this properly, but no one
has any idea what exactly the new uapi should look like. Since this
has been shipping for years already compositors need to deal no matter
what, so as a first step just try to enforce this across drivers
better with some checks.

v2: Add comments and a WARN_ON to enforce this only when allowed - we
don't want to silently convert page flips into blocking plane updates
just because the driver is buggy.

v3: Fix inverted WARN_ON (Pekka).

v4: Drop the uapi changes, only add a WARN_ON for now to enforce some
rules for drivers.

v5: Make the WARNING more informative (Daniel)

v6: Add unconditional debug output for compositor hackers to figure
out what's going on when they get an EBUSY (Daniel)

References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-July/182281.html
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/issues/24#note_9568
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
index 58527f151984..f1a912e80846 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
@@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_state_free);
  * needed. It will also grab the relevant CRTC lock to make sure that the state
  * is consistent.
  *
+ * WARNING: Drivers may only add new CRTC states to a @state if
+ * drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset is set, or if it's a driver-internal commit
+ * not created by userspace through an IOCTL call.
+ *
  * Returns:
  *
  * Either the allocated state or the error code encoded into the pointer. When
@@ -1262,10 +1266,15 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
 	struct drm_connector *conn;
 	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
+	unsigned requested_crtc = 0;
+	unsigned affected_crtc = 0;
 	int i, ret = 0;
 
 	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
 
+	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
+		requested_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
+
 	for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
 		ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
 		if (ret) {
@@ -1313,6 +1322,26 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 		}
 	}
 
+	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
+		affected_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
+
+	/*
+	 * For commits that allow modesets drivers can add other CRTCs to the
+	 * atomic commit, e.g. when they need to reallocate global resources.
+	 * This can cause spurious EBUSY, which robs compositors of a very
+	 * effective sanity check for their drawing loop. Therefor only allow
+	 * drivers to add unrelated CRTC states for modeset commits.
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: Should add affected_crtc mask to the ATOMIC IOCTL as an output
+	 * so compositors know what's going on.
+	 */
+	if (affected_crtc != requested_crtc) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("driver added CRTC to commit: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
+				 requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
+		WARN(!state->allow_modeset, "adding CRTC not allowed without modesets: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
+		     requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-23 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-23 10:57 [PATCH 1/2] drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: debug output for EBUSY Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 10:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-25  8:27   ` Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-25  8:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-23 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY Patchwork
2020-09-23 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-09-23 14:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-09-23 15:18 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-09-23 15:18   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 19:17   ` Marius Vlad
2020-09-23 19:17     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marius Vlad
2020-09-23 20:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 20:01       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-24  7:41       ` Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-24  7:41         ` [Intel-gfx] " Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-24  8:04         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-24  8:04           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-24 10:10           ` Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-24 10:10             ` [Intel-gfx] " Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-24 11:01             ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-24 11:01               ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-24 11:13               ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-24 11:13                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-24 11:32                 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-24 11:32                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-25  8:24   ` Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-25  8:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Pekka Paalanen
2020-09-25  8:45     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-25  8:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-23 15:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY (rev2) Patchwork
2020-09-23 16:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200923151852.2952812-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.