All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Lechner" <david@lechnology.com>,
	"Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010032118420.2741@hadrien>

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the
> > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that
> > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series.
> > >
> > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as
> > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the
> > > series.
> > >
> > > Can this be improved in b4?
> >
> > So, the following logic should be applied:
> >
> > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n
> > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was
> >   cherry-picked out of the series
> >
> > Is that an accurate summary?
> 
> That sounds good.

I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 
got applied. Would the following be better:

-----
From: ...
To: ...
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons...

On Sun...
> These patches...
>
> [...]

A subset of these patches was applied to

  https://...

Thanks!

[5/18] regmap: debugfs:
       commit:

(etc)
-----

In other words, we:

- specifically say that it's a subset
- instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, 
  as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the 
  posted series (e.g. [5/18])

I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone 
with 49 emails.

-K

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Lechner" <david@lechnology.com>,
	"Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:31:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010032118420.2741@hadrien>

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the
> > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that
> > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series.
> > >
> > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as
> > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the
> > > series.
> > >
> > > Can this be improved in b4?
> >
> > So, the following logic should be applied:
> >
> > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n
> > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was
> >   cherry-picked out of the series
> >
> > Is that an accurate summary?
> 
> That sounds good.

I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 
got applied. Would the following be better:

-----
From: ...
To: ...
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons...

On Sun...
> These patches...
>
> [...]

A subset of these patches was applied to

  https://...

Thanks!

[5/18] regmap: debugfs:
       commit:

(etc)
-----

In other words, we:

- specifically say that it's a subset
- instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, 
  as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the 
  posted series (e.g. [5/18])

I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone 
with 49 emails.

-K

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	"David Lechner" <david@lechnology.com>,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010032118420.2741@hadrien>

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the
> > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that
> > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series.
> > >
> > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as
> > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the
> > > series.
> > >
> > > Can this be improved in b4?
> >
> > So, the following logic should be applied:
> >
> > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n
> > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was
> >   cherry-picked out of the series
> >
> > Is that an accurate summary?
> 
> That sounds good.

I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 
got applied. Would the following be better:

-----
From: ...
To: ...
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons...

On Sun...
> These patches...
>
> [...]

A subset of these patches was applied to

  https://...

Thanks!

[5/18] regmap: debugfs:
       commit:

(etc)
-----

In other words, we:

- specifically say that it's a subset
- instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, 
  as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the 
  posted series (e.g. [5/18])

I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone 
with 49 emails.

-K

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	"David Lechner" <david@lechnology.com>,
	"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010032118420.2741@hadrien>

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the
> > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that
> > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series.
> > >
> > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as
> > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the
> > > series.
> > >
> > > Can this be improved in b4?
> >
> > So, the following logic should be applied:
> >
> > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n
> > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was
> >   cherry-picked out of the series
> >
> > Is that an accurate summary?
> 
> That sounds good.

I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 
got applied. Would the following be better:

-----
From: ...
To: ...
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons...

On Sun...
> These patches...
>
> [...]

A subset of these patches was applied to

  https://...

Thanks!

[5/18] regmap: debugfs:
       commit:

(etc)
-----

In other words, we:

- specifically say that it's a subset
- instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, 
  as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the 
  posted series (e.g. [5/18])

I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone 
with 49 emails.

-K

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-03 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 195+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-27 19:12 [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 01/18] clk: uniphier: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-14  0:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 02/18] ipmi:bt-bmc: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 03/18] [ARM] pata_icside: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28 16:47   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-28 16:47     ` Joe Perches
2020-09-28 17:11     ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28 17:11       ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28 17:57       ` Joe Perches
2020-09-28 17:57         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 04/18] hwrng: stm32 - " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-02 11:55   ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:55     ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:55     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 05/18] bcma: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-01 13:24   ` Kalle Valo
2020-10-01 13:24     ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 06/18] hwrng: iproc-rng200 - " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28  1:42   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-09-28  1:42     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-09-28  1:42     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-02 11:55   ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:55     ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:55     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 07/18] hwrng: mxc-rnga " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-02 11:55   ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:55     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 08/18] agp: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 09/18] clk: mvebu: ap80x-cpu: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-14  0:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 10/18] clk: meson: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28  9:47   ` Jerome Brunet
2020-09-28  9:47     ` Jerome Brunet
2020-09-28  9:47     ` Jerome Brunet
2020-09-28  9:47     ` Jerome Brunet
2020-10-08  1:54     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-08  1:54       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-08  1:54       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-08  1:54       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-10-14  0:44     ` Stephen Boyd
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 11/18] clocksource/drivers/mps2-timer: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` [PATCH 11/18] clocksource/drivers/mps2-timer: use semicolons rather than commas to separate statemen Julia Lawall
2020-10-01  8:13   ` [tip: timers/core] clocksource/drivers/mps2-timer: Use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements tip-bot2 for Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 12/18] ACPI: use " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 20:27   ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-09-27 20:27     ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 13/18] crypto: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-02 11:56   ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:56     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] regmap: debugfs: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] counter: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-28 15:37   ` David Lechner
2020-09-28 15:37     ` David Lechner
2020-09-29 15:27     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-29 15:27       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] clocksource/drivers: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-02 14:29   ` [tip: timers/core] clocksource/drivers/armada-370-xp: Use " tip-bot2 for Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] crypto: atmel-tdes - use " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-02 11:56   ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:56     ` Herbert Xu
2020-10-02 11:56     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-27 19:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] drbd: " Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 19:12   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-27 20:08 ` [PATCH 00/18] " Joe Perches
2020-09-27 20:08   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-27 20:08   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-27 20:08   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-28 19:35 ` Mark Brown
2020-09-28 19:35   ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29  0:45   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29  0:45     ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29  0:45     ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29  0:45     ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 11:37     ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 11:37       ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 11:37       ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 11:37       ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 11:46       ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 11:46         ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 11:46         ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 11:46         ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:37         ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 12:37           ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 12:37           ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 12:37           ` Mark Brown
2020-09-29 12:44           ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:44             ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:44             ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:44             ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-30 19:33       ` Joe Perches
2020-09-30 19:33         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-30 19:33         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-30 19:33         ` Joe Perches
2020-10-01 11:01         ` Mark Brown
2020-10-01 11:01           ` Mark Brown
2020-10-01 11:01           ` Mark Brown
2020-10-01 11:01           ` Mark Brown
2020-10-03 18:40           ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 18:40             ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 18:40             ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 18:40             ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:15             ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:15               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:15               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:15               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:18               ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-03 19:18                 ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-03 19:18                 ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-03 19:18                 ` Julia Lawall
2020-10-03 19:31                 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2020-10-03 19:31                   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:31                   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:31                   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-10-03 19:43                   ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:43                     ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:43                     ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:43                     ` Joe Perches
2020-10-05 16:52                     ` Mark Brown
2020-10-05 16:52                       ` Mark Brown
2020-10-05 16:52                       ` Mark Brown
2020-10-05 16:52                       ` Mark Brown
2020-10-05 16:52                       ` Mark Brown
2020-10-03 19:27               ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:27                 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:27                 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:27                 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:36                 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:36                   ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:36                   ` Joe Perches
2020-10-03 19:36                   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 12:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-29 12:20   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-29 12:20   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-29 12:20   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-29 12:36   ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:36     ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:36     ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:36     ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:41   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-29 12:41     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-29 12:41     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-29 12:41     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-29 12:47     ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:47       ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:47       ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 12:47       ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 13:34       ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 13:34         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 13:34         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 13:34         ` Joe Perches
2020-09-29 13:42         ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Julia Lawall
2020-09-29 13:42         ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-29 13:42           ` Shuah Khan
2020-10-02 16:47           ` Shuah Khan
2020-10-02 16:47             ` Shuah Khan
2020-10-02 16:47             ` Shuah Khan
2020-10-02 16:47             ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local \
    --to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.