All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 42/65] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023122216.2373294-42-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel
takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the
pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do
not revoke mappings.

To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to
kernel/resource.c.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
--
v3:
- add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check
  for NULL (Jason)
v4
- Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke
  code now (Dan)
---
 drivers/char/mem.c     |  85 +---------------------------------
 include/linux/ioport.h |   6 +--
 kernel/resource.c      | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index 5502f56f3655..53338aad8d28 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
 #include <linux/uio.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
-#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
-#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
-#include <linux/mount.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 # include <linux/efi.h>
@@ -809,42 +806,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct inode *devmem_inode;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res)
-{
-	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */
-	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode);
-
-	/*
-	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
-	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
-	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from
-	 * establishing mappings.
-	 */
-	if (!inode)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
-	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
-	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
-	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
-	 */
-	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
-	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
-		/*
-		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
-		 * worst that can happen?"
-		 */
-		return;
-	}
-
-	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
-}
-#endif
-
 static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -864,7 +825,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	 * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped
 	 * range.
 	 */
-	filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+	filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -995,48 +956,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 
 static struct class *mem_class;
 
-static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
-{
-	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = {
-	.name		= "devmem",
-	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
-	.init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context,
-	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
-};
-
-static int devmem_init_inode(void)
-{
-	static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount;
-	static int devmem_fs_cnt;
-	struct inode *inode;
-	int rc;
-
-	rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
-		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc);
-		simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Publish /dev/mem initialized.
-	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem().
-	 */
-	smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 {
 	int minor;
@@ -1058,8 +977,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 		 */
 		if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port())
 			continue;
-		if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0)
-			continue;
 
 		device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor),
 			      NULL, devlist[minor].name);
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb..8ffb61b36606 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -302,11 +302,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
 struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base,
 		unsigned long size, const char *name);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res);
-#else
-static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { };
-#endif
+extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void);
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 841737bbda9e..a800acbc578c 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -18,12 +18,15 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/pfn.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
 #include <linux/resource_ext.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
 
@@ -1112,6 +1115,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res)
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait);
 
+static struct inode *iomem_inode;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res)
+{
+	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */
+	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
+	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
+	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users
+	 * from establishing mappings.
+	 */
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
+	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
+	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
+	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
+	 */
+	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
+	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
+		/*
+		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
+		 * worst that can happen?"
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
+
+	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
+}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed
+	 * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But
+	 * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need
+	 * the barrier to appease checkers.
+	 */
+	return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping;
+}
+#else
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
  * @parent: parent resource descriptor
@@ -1179,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 
 	if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource)
-		revoke_devmem(res);
+		revoke_iomem(res);
 
 	return res;
 }
@@ -1713,4 +1768,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
+{
+	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = {
+	.name		= "iomem",
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context,
+	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
+};
+
+static int __init iomem_init_inode(void)
+{
+	static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount;
+	static int iomem_fs_cnt;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
+	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
+		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc);
+		simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized.
+	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem().
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode);
+
 __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);
-- 
2.28.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 42/65] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023122216.2373294-42-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel
takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the
pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do
not revoke mappings.

To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to
kernel/resource.c.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
--
v3:
- add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check
  for NULL (Jason)
v4
- Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke
  code now (Dan)
---
 drivers/char/mem.c     |  85 +---------------------------------
 include/linux/ioport.h |   6 +--
 kernel/resource.c      | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index 5502f56f3655..53338aad8d28 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
 #include <linux/uio.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
-#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
-#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
-#include <linux/mount.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 # include <linux/efi.h>
@@ -809,42 +806,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct inode *devmem_inode;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res)
-{
-	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */
-	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode);
-
-	/*
-	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
-	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
-	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from
-	 * establishing mappings.
-	 */
-	if (!inode)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
-	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
-	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
-	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
-	 */
-	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
-	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
-		/*
-		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
-		 * worst that can happen?"
-		 */
-		return;
-	}
-
-	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
-}
-#endif
-
 static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -864,7 +825,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	 * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped
 	 * range.
 	 */
-	filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+	filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -995,48 +956,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 
 static struct class *mem_class;
 
-static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
-{
-	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = {
-	.name		= "devmem",
-	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
-	.init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context,
-	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
-};
-
-static int devmem_init_inode(void)
-{
-	static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount;
-	static int devmem_fs_cnt;
-	struct inode *inode;
-	int rc;
-
-	rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
-		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc);
-		simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Publish /dev/mem initialized.
-	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem().
-	 */
-	smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 {
 	int minor;
@@ -1058,8 +977,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 		 */
 		if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port())
 			continue;
-		if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0)
-			continue;
 
 		device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor),
 			      NULL, devlist[minor].name);
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb..8ffb61b36606 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -302,11 +302,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
 struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base,
 		unsigned long size, const char *name);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res);
-#else
-static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { };
-#endif
+extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void);
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 841737bbda9e..a800acbc578c 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -18,12 +18,15 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/pfn.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
 #include <linux/resource_ext.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
 
@@ -1112,6 +1115,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res)
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait);
 
+static struct inode *iomem_inode;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res)
+{
+	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */
+	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
+	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
+	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users
+	 * from establishing mappings.
+	 */
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
+	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
+	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
+	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
+	 */
+	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
+	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
+		/*
+		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
+		 * worst that can happen?"
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
+
+	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
+}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed
+	 * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But
+	 * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need
+	 * the barrier to appease checkers.
+	 */
+	return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping;
+}
+#else
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
  * @parent: parent resource descriptor
@@ -1179,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 
 	if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource)
-		revoke_devmem(res);
+		revoke_iomem(res);
 
 	return res;
 }
@@ -1713,4 +1768,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
+{
+	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = {
+	.name		= "iomem",
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context,
+	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
+};
+
+static int __init iomem_init_inode(void)
+{
+	static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount;
+	static int iomem_fs_cnt;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
+	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
+		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc);
+		simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized.
+	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem().
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode);
+
 __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 42/65] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023122216.2373294-42-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel
takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the
pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do
not revoke mappings.

To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to
kernel/resource.c.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
--
v3:
- add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check
  for NULL (Jason)
v4
- Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke
  code now (Dan)
---
 drivers/char/mem.c     |  85 +---------------------------------
 include/linux/ioport.h |   6 +--
 kernel/resource.c      | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index 5502f56f3655..53338aad8d28 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
 #include <linux/uio.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
-#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
-#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
-#include <linux/mount.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 # include <linux/efi.h>
@@ -809,42 +806,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct inode *devmem_inode;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res)
-{
-	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */
-	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode);
-
-	/*
-	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
-	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
-	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from
-	 * establishing mappings.
-	 */
-	if (!inode)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
-	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
-	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
-	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
-	 */
-	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
-	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
-		/*
-		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
-		 * worst that can happen?"
-		 */
-		return;
-	}
-
-	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
-}
-#endif
-
 static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -864,7 +825,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	 * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped
 	 * range.
 	 */
-	filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+	filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -995,48 +956,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 
 static struct class *mem_class;
 
-static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
-{
-	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = {
-	.name		= "devmem",
-	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
-	.init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context,
-	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
-};
-
-static int devmem_init_inode(void)
-{
-	static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount;
-	static int devmem_fs_cnt;
-	struct inode *inode;
-	int rc;
-
-	rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
-		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc);
-		simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Publish /dev/mem initialized.
-	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem().
-	 */
-	smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 {
 	int minor;
@@ -1058,8 +977,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 		 */
 		if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port())
 			continue;
-		if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0)
-			continue;
 
 		device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor),
 			      NULL, devlist[minor].name);
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb..8ffb61b36606 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -302,11 +302,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
 struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base,
 		unsigned long size, const char *name);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res);
-#else
-static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { };
-#endif
+extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void);
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 841737bbda9e..a800acbc578c 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -18,12 +18,15 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/pfn.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
 #include <linux/resource_ext.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
 
@@ -1112,6 +1115,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res)
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait);
 
+static struct inode *iomem_inode;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res)
+{
+	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */
+	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
+	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
+	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users
+	 * from establishing mappings.
+	 */
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
+	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
+	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
+	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
+	 */
+	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
+	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
+		/*
+		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
+		 * worst that can happen?"
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
+
+	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
+}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed
+	 * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But
+	 * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need
+	 * the barrier to appease checkers.
+	 */
+	return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping;
+}
+#else
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
  * @parent: parent resource descriptor
@@ -1179,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 
 	if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource)
-		revoke_devmem(res);
+		revoke_iomem(res);
 
 	return res;
 }
@@ -1713,4 +1768,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
+{
+	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = {
+	.name		= "iomem",
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context,
+	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
+};
+
+static int __init iomem_init_inode(void)
+{
+	static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount;
+	static int iomem_fs_cnt;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
+	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
+		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc);
+		simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized.
+	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem().
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode);
+
 __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/65] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023122216.2373294-42-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel
takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the
pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do
not revoke mappings.

To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to
kernel/resource.c.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
--
v3:
- add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check
  for NULL (Jason)
v4
- Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke
  code now (Dan)
---
 drivers/char/mem.c     |  85 +---------------------------------
 include/linux/ioport.h |   6 +--
 kernel/resource.c      | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index 5502f56f3655..53338aad8d28 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -31,9 +31,6 @@
 #include <linux/uio.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
-#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
-#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
-#include <linux/mount.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
 # include <linux/efi.h>
@@ -809,42 +806,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct inode *devmem_inode;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res)
-{
-	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */
-	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode);
-
-	/*
-	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
-	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
-	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from
-	 * establishing mappings.
-	 */
-	if (!inode)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
-	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
-	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
-	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
-	 */
-	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
-	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
-		/*
-		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
-		 * worst that can happen?"
-		 */
-		return;
-	}
-
-	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
-}
-#endif
-
 static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	int rc;
@@ -864,7 +825,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	 * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped
 	 * range.
 	 */
-	filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+	filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -995,48 +956,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 
 static struct class *mem_class;
 
-static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
-{
-	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = {
-	.name		= "devmem",
-	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
-	.init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context,
-	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
-};
-
-static int devmem_init_inode(void)
-{
-	static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount;
-	static int devmem_fs_cnt;
-	struct inode *inode;
-	int rc;
-
-	rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-	if (rc < 0) {
-		pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
-	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
-		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc);
-		simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt);
-		return rc;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Publish /dev/mem initialized.
-	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem().
-	 */
-	smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 {
 	int minor;
@@ -1058,8 +977,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void)
 		 */
 		if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port())
 			continue;
-		if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0)
-			continue;
 
 		device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor),
 			      NULL, devlist[minor].name);
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb..8ffb61b36606 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -302,11 +302,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
 struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base,
 		unsigned long size, const char *name);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
-void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res);
-#else
-static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { };
-#endif
+extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void);
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 841737bbda9e..a800acbc578c 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -18,12 +18,15 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/pseudo_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/pfn.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
 #include <linux/resource_ext.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/magic.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
 
@@ -1112,6 +1115,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res)
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait);
 
+static struct inode *iomem_inode;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res)
+{
+	/* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */
+	struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race
+	 * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before
+	 * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users
+	 * from establishing mappings.
+	 */
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked
+	 * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed()
+	 * should start returning false, however for performance this
+	 * does not iterate the entire resource range.
+	 */
+	if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) &&
+	    devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) {
+		/*
+		 * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the
+		 * worst that can happen?"
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
+
+	unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
+}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed
+	 * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But
+	 * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need
+	 * the barrier to appease checkers.
+	 */
+	return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping;
+}
+#else
+static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {}
+struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
  * @parent: parent resource descriptor
@@ -1179,7 +1234,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 
 	if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource)
-		revoke_devmem(res);
+		revoke_iomem(res);
 
 	return res;
 }
@@ -1713,4 +1768,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
+{
+	return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = {
+	.name		= "iomem",
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context,
+	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
+};
+
+static int __init iomem_init_inode(void)
+{
+	static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount;
+	static int iomem_fs_cnt;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb);
+	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
+		pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc);
+		simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized.
+	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem().
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode);
+
 __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-23 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 229+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21 16:32 [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic-helpers: remove legacy_cursor_update hacks Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 16:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/vc4: Drop legacy_cursor_update override Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 16:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 13:19   ` Maxime Ripard
2020-10-22 13:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Maxime Ripard
2020-10-21 16:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 16:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/atomic-helpers: remove legacy_cursor_update hacks Patchwork
2020-10-21 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-22 13:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2020-10-22 13:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2020-10-22 14:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 14:03     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 17:02 ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 17:02   ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 17:02   ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 17:21   ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 17:21     ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 17:21     ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 19:16     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 19:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 19:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 15:02       ` Rob Clark
2020-10-23 15:02         ` Rob Clark
2020-10-23 15:02         ` Rob Clark
2020-10-23 16:00         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 16:00           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 16:00           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 16:21           ` Rob Clark
2020-10-23 16:21             ` Rob Clark
2020-10-23 16:21             ` Rob Clark
2020-10-22 20:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/atomic-helpers: remove legacy_cursor_update hacks (rev2) Patchwork
2020-10-23 12:21 ` [PATCH 01/65] drm/vc4: Drop legacy_cursor_update override Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 02/65] drm/doc: Document legacy_cursor_update better Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 03/65] mm: Track mmu notifiers in fs_reclaim_acquire/release Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-27 18:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-27 18:51       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-27 19:01       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-27 19:01         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-27 19:01         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-27 19:01         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 04/65] mm: Extract might_alloc() debug check Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-23 14:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-23 14:14       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-23 14:16     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-23 14:16       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-23 14:37       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:37         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:37         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:45         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:45           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 20:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-23 20:53       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-23 20:53       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 05/65] drm/atomic-helper: Add dma-fence annotations Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 06/65] drm/vkms: Annotate vblank timer Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 07/65] drm/vblank: Annotate with dma-fence signalling section Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 08/65] drm/amdgpu: add dma-fence annotations to atomic commit path Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 09/65] drm/komeda: Annotate dma-fence critical section in " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 10/65] drm/malidp: " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-28 13:27     ` Liviu Dudau
2020-10-28 13:27       ` [Intel-gfx] " Liviu Dudau
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 11/65] drm/atmel: Use drm_atomic_helper_commit Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 12/65] drm/imx: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 13/65] drm/omapdrm: " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-26  7:13     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-10-26  7:13       ` [Intel-gfx] " Tomi Valkeinen
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 14/65] drm/rcar-du: " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-16  1:29     ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-16  1:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-16  1:29       ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-16  9:41       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-16  9:41         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-16  9:41         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 15/65] drm/tegra: " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 16/65] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 17/65] drm/scheduler: use dma-fence annotations in main thread Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 18/65] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations in cs_submit() Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 19/65] drm/amdgpu: s/GFP_KERNEL/GFP_ATOMIC in scheduler code Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 20/65] drm/scheduler: use dma-fence annotations in tdr work Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 21/65] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations for gpu reset code Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 22/65] Revert "drm/amdgpu: add fbdev suspend/resume on gpu reset" Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 23/65] drm/i915: Annotate dma_fence_work Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 24/65] Revert "drm/i915: Annotate dma_fence_work" Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
     [not found]   ` <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [PATCH 25/65] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 26/65] drm/vmwgfx: Drop svga_lock Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 27/65] drm/vmwgfx: Always evict vram _before_ disabling it Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 28/65] drm/ttm: WARN_ON non-empty lru when disabling a resource manager Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:54     ` Christian König
2020-10-23 14:54       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-10-23 14:56       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 14:56         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 16:30         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 16:30           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 29/65] s390/pci: Remove races against pte updates Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 30/65] drm/exynos: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 31/65] drm/exynos: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for g2d cmdlists Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 32/65] misc/habana: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 33/65] misc/habana: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for userptr Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 34/65] mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 35/65] media: videobuf2: Move frame_vector into media subsystem Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 36/65] mm: Close race in generic_access_phys Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 37/65] mm: Add unsafe_follow_pfn Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 38/65] media/videbuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 39/65] vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 40/65] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 41/65] /dev/mem: Only set filp->f_mapping Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/65] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 43/65] sysfs: Support zapping of binary attr mmaps Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21   ` [PATCH 44/65] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:25   ` [PATCH 01/65] drm/vc4: Drop legacy_cursor_update override Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26 ` [PATCH] drm/atomic-helpers: remove legacy_cursor_update hacks Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23 12:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201023122216.2373294-42-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.