Re: [PATCH 06/45] zram: remove the claim mechanism

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/45] zram: remove the claim mechanism
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:37:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125123750.GJ16944@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124132751.3747337-7-hch@lst.de>

On Tue 24-11-20 14:27:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The zram claim mechanism was added to ensure no new opens come in
> during teardown.  But the proper way to archive that is to call
					  ^^^ achieve

> del_gendisk first, which takes care of all that.  Once del_gendisk
> is called in the right place, the reset side can also be simplified
> as no I/O can be outstanding on a block device that is not open.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Otherwise I didn't find anything obviously wrong with the patch but I don't
feel confident enough with zram to really give you my reviewed-by on this
one.

								Honza

> ---
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 72 ++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 6d15d51cee2b7e..2e6d75ec1afddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -1756,64 +1756,33 @@ static ssize_t disksize_store(struct device *dev,
>  static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
>  		struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -	unsigned short do_reset;
> -	struct zram *zram;
> +	struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
>  	struct block_device *bdev;
> +	unsigned short do_reset;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	ret = kstrtou16(buf, 10, &do_reset);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -
>  	if (!do_reset)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
>  	bdev = bdget_disk(zram->disk, 0);
>  	if (!bdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -	/* Do not reset an active device or claimed device */
> -	if (bdev->bd_openers || zram->claim) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -		bdput(bdev);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* From now on, anyone can't open /dev/zram[0-9] */
> -	zram->claim = true;
> +	if (bdev->bd_openers)
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +	else
> +		zram_reset_device(zram);
>  	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -
> -	/* Make sure all the pending I/O are finished */
> -	fsync_bdev(bdev);
> -	zram_reset_device(zram);
>  	bdput(bdev);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -	zram->claim = false;
> -	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -
> -	return len;
> -}
> -
> -static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> -{
> -	int ret = 0;
> -	struct zram *zram;
> -
> -	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&bdev->bd_mutex));
> -
> -	zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -	/* zram was claimed to reset so open request fails */
> -	if (zram->claim)
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return ret ? ret : len;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = {
> -	.open = zram_open,
>  	.submit_bio = zram_submit_bio,
>  	.swap_slot_free_notify = zram_slot_free_notify,
>  	.rw_page = zram_rw_page,
> @@ -1821,7 +1790,6 @@ static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct block_device_operations zram_wb_devops = {
> -	.open = zram_open,
>  	.submit_bio = zram_submit_bio,
>  	.swap_slot_free_notify = zram_slot_free_notify,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE
> @@ -1974,32 +1942,22 @@ static int zram_add(void)
>  
>  static int zram_remove(struct zram *zram)
>  {
> -	struct block_device *bdev;
> -
> -	bdev = bdget_disk(zram->disk, 0);
> -	if (!bdev)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	struct block_device *bdev = bdget_disk(zram->disk, 0);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -	if (bdev->bd_openers || zram->claim) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> +	if (bdev) {
> +		if (bdev->bd_openers) {
> +			bdput(bdev);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
>  		bdput(bdev);
> -		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -	zram->claim = true;
> -	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> -
> +	del_gendisk(zram->disk);
>  	zram_debugfs_unregister(zram);
> -
> -	/* Make sure all the pending I/O are finished */
> -	fsync_bdev(bdev);
>  	zram_reset_device(zram);
> -	bdput(bdev);
>  
>  	pr_info("Removed device: %s\n", zram->disk->disk_name);
>  
> -	del_gendisk(zram->disk);
>  	blk_cleanup_queue(zram->disk->queue);
>  	put_disk(zram->disk);
>  	kfree(zram);
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR