All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/17] mm: add mmu_notifier argument to follow_pfn
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130142820.GN401619@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202011280356.rPWHFNW4-lkp@intel.com>

So I guess kvm platforms that don't set KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER exist,
and at least on powerpc they're consistent with KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU
signalling that the guest pagetables stays in sync automatically with any
updates. So for that case I guess we could use unsafe_follow_pfn.

But on s390 this seems different: No mmu notifier, but KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU is
set. So I guess there's some hardware magic on s390 that I don't know
about.

Not sure what to do with this now here ...
-Daniel


On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:10:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linuxtv-media/master]
> [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.10-rc5]
> [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20201127]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
> config: s390-randconfig-r032-20201127 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f095ac11a9550530a4a54298debb8b04b36422be)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
>         git checkout d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >>  8) |            \
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            __fswab32(x))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> >> arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1894:40: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>            r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                             ~~~  ^
>    arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1909:41: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>                    r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                                     ~~~  ^
>    20 warnings and 2 errors generated.
> 
> vim +1894 arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> 
>   1885	
>   1886	static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct kvm *kvm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   1887				       unsigned long addr, bool *async,
>   1888				       bool write_fault, bool *writable,
>   1889				       kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
>   1890	{
>   1891		unsigned long pfn;
>   1892		int r;
>   1893	
> > 1894		r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1895		if (r) {
>   1896			/*
>   1897			 * get_user_pages fails for VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP vmas and does
>   1898			 * not call the fault handler, so do it here.
>   1899			 */
>   1900			bool unlocked = false;
>   1901			r = fixup_user_fault(current->mm, addr,
>   1902					     (write_fault ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0),
>   1903					     &unlocked);
>   1904			if (unlocked)
>   1905				return -EAGAIN;
>   1906			if (r)
>   1907				return r;
>   1908	
>   1909			r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1910			if (r)
>   1911				return r;
>   1912	
>   1913		}
>   1914	
>   1915		if (writable)
>   1916			*writable = true;
>   1917	
>   1918		/*
>   1919		 * Get a reference here because callers of *hva_to_pfn* and
>   1920		 * *gfn_to_pfn* ultimately call kvm_release_pfn_clean on the
>   1921		 * returned pfn.  This is only needed if the VMA has VM_MIXEDMAP
>   1922		 * set, but the kvm_get_pfn/kvm_release_pfn_clean pair will
>   1923		 * simply do nothing for reserved pfns.
>   1924		 *
>   1925		 * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
>   1926		 * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
>   1927		 * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
>   1928		 */ 
>   1929		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
>   1930	
>   1931		*p_pfn = pfn;
>   1932		return 0;
>   1933	}
>   1934	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/17] mm: add mmu_notifier argument to follow_pfn
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130142820.GN401619@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202011280356.rPWHFNW4-lkp@intel.com>

So I guess kvm platforms that don't set KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER exist,
and at least on powerpc they're consistent with KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU
signalling that the guest pagetables stays in sync automatically with any
updates. So for that case I guess we could use unsafe_follow_pfn.

But on s390 this seems different: No mmu notifier, but KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU is
set. So I guess there's some hardware magic on s390 that I don't know
about.

Not sure what to do with this now here ...
-Daniel


On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:10:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linuxtv-media/master]
> [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.10-rc5]
> [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20201127]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
> config: s390-randconfig-r032-20201127 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f095ac11a9550530a4a54298debb8b04b36422be)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
>         git checkout d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >>  8) |            \
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            __fswab32(x))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> >> arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1894:40: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>            r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                             ~~~  ^
>    arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1909:41: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>                    r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                                     ~~~  ^
>    20 warnings and 2 errors generated.
> 
> vim +1894 arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> 
>   1885	
>   1886	static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct kvm *kvm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   1887				       unsigned long addr, bool *async,
>   1888				       bool write_fault, bool *writable,
>   1889				       kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
>   1890	{
>   1891		unsigned long pfn;
>   1892		int r;
>   1893	
> > 1894		r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1895		if (r) {
>   1896			/*
>   1897			 * get_user_pages fails for VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP vmas and does
>   1898			 * not call the fault handler, so do it here.
>   1899			 */
>   1900			bool unlocked = false;
>   1901			r = fixup_user_fault(current->mm, addr,
>   1902					     (write_fault ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0),
>   1903					     &unlocked);
>   1904			if (unlocked)
>   1905				return -EAGAIN;
>   1906			if (r)
>   1907				return r;
>   1908	
>   1909			r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1910			if (r)
>   1911				return r;
>   1912	
>   1913		}
>   1914	
>   1915		if (writable)
>   1916			*writable = true;
>   1917	
>   1918		/*
>   1919		 * Get a reference here because callers of *hva_to_pfn* and
>   1920		 * *gfn_to_pfn* ultimately call kvm_release_pfn_clean on the
>   1921		 * returned pfn.  This is only needed if the VMA has VM_MIXEDMAP
>   1922		 * set, but the kvm_get_pfn/kvm_release_pfn_clean pair will
>   1923		 * simply do nothing for reserved pfns.
>   1924		 *
>   1925		 * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
>   1926		 * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
>   1927		 * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
>   1928		 */ 
>   1929		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
>   1930	
>   1931		*p_pfn = pfn;
>   1932		return 0;
>   1933	}
>   1934	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/17] mm: add mmu_notifier argument to follow_pfn
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130142820.GN401619@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202011280356.rPWHFNW4-lkp@intel.com>

So I guess kvm platforms that don't set KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER exist,
and at least on powerpc they're consistent with KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU
signalling that the guest pagetables stays in sync automatically with any
updates. So for that case I guess we could use unsafe_follow_pfn.

But on s390 this seems different: No mmu notifier, but KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU is
set. So I guess there's some hardware magic on s390 that I don't know
about.

Not sure what to do with this now here ...
-Daniel


On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:10:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linuxtv-media/master]
> [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.10-rc5]
> [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20201127]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
> config: s390-randconfig-r032-20201127 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f095ac11a9550530a4a54298debb8b04b36422be)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
>         git checkout d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >>  8) |            \
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            __fswab32(x))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> >> arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1894:40: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>            r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                             ~~~  ^
>    arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1909:41: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>                    r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                                     ~~~  ^
>    20 warnings and 2 errors generated.
> 
> vim +1894 arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> 
>   1885	
>   1886	static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct kvm *kvm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   1887				       unsigned long addr, bool *async,
>   1888				       bool write_fault, bool *writable,
>   1889				       kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
>   1890	{
>   1891		unsigned long pfn;
>   1892		int r;
>   1893	
> > 1894		r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1895		if (r) {
>   1896			/*
>   1897			 * get_user_pages fails for VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP vmas and does
>   1898			 * not call the fault handler, so do it here.
>   1899			 */
>   1900			bool unlocked = false;
>   1901			r = fixup_user_fault(current->mm, addr,
>   1902					     (write_fault ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0),
>   1903					     &unlocked);
>   1904			if (unlocked)
>   1905				return -EAGAIN;
>   1906			if (r)
>   1907				return r;
>   1908	
>   1909			r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1910			if (r)
>   1911				return r;
>   1912	
>   1913		}
>   1914	
>   1915		if (writable)
>   1916			*writable = true;
>   1917	
>   1918		/*
>   1919		 * Get a reference here because callers of *hva_to_pfn* and
>   1920		 * *gfn_to_pfn* ultimately call kvm_release_pfn_clean on the
>   1921		 * returned pfn.  This is only needed if the VMA has VM_MIXEDMAP
>   1922		 * set, but the kvm_get_pfn/kvm_release_pfn_clean pair will
>   1923		 * simply do nothing for reserved pfns.
>   1924		 *
>   1925		 * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
>   1926		 * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
>   1927		 * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
>   1928		 */ 
>   1929		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
>   1930	
>   1931		*p_pfn = pfn;
>   1932		return 0;
>   1933	}
>   1934	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/17] mm: add mmu_notifier argument to follow_pfn
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130142820.GN401619@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202011280356.rPWHFNW4-lkp@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11959 bytes --]

So I guess kvm platforms that don't set KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER exist,
and at least on powerpc they're consistent with KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU
signalling that the guest pagetables stays in sync automatically with any
updates. So for that case I guess we could use unsafe_follow_pfn.

But on s390 this seems different: No mmu notifier, but KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU is
set. So I guess there's some hardware magic on s390 that I don't know
about.

Not sure what to do with this now here ...
-Daniel


On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:10:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linuxtv-media/master]
> [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.10-rc5]
> [cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20201127]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
> base:   git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
> config: s390-randconfig-r032-20201127 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f095ac11a9550530a4a54298debb8b04b36422be)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniel-Vetter/follow_pfn-and-other-iomap-races/20201128-004421
>         git checkout d76a3489433ce67d45da86aa12953385427f0ac9
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >>  8) |            \
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
>                               ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
>            (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
>                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
>    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
>                                                              ^
>    include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
>            __fswab32(x))
>                      ^
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:18:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_host.h:32:
>    In file included from include/linux/kvm_para.h:5:
>    In file included from include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h:36:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h:25:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/diag.h:12:
>    In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
>    In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
>    In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
>    In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
>                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>    include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>            writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
>                    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> >> arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1894:40: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>            r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                             ~~~  ^
>    arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1909:41: error: no member named 'mmu_notifier' in 'struct kvm'
>                    r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>                                                     ~~~  ^
>    20 warnings and 2 errors generated.
> 
> vim +1894 arch/s390/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> 
>   1885	
>   1886	static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct kvm *kvm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   1887				       unsigned long addr, bool *async,
>   1888				       bool write_fault, bool *writable,
>   1889				       kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
>   1890	{
>   1891		unsigned long pfn;
>   1892		int r;
>   1893	
> > 1894		r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1895		if (r) {
>   1896			/*
>   1897			 * get_user_pages fails for VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP vmas and does
>   1898			 * not call the fault handler, so do it here.
>   1899			 */
>   1900			bool unlocked = false;
>   1901			r = fixup_user_fault(current->mm, addr,
>   1902					     (write_fault ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0),
>   1903					     &unlocked);
>   1904			if (unlocked)
>   1905				return -EAGAIN;
>   1906			if (r)
>   1907				return r;
>   1908	
>   1909			r = follow_pfn(vma, addr, &pfn, &kvm->mmu_notifier);
>   1910			if (r)
>   1911				return r;
>   1912	
>   1913		}
>   1914	
>   1915		if (writable)
>   1916			*writable = true;
>   1917	
>   1918		/*
>   1919		 * Get a reference here because callers of *hva_to_pfn* and
>   1920		 * *gfn_to_pfn* ultimately call kvm_release_pfn_clean on the
>   1921		 * returned pfn.  This is only needed if the VMA has VM_MIXEDMAP
>   1922		 * set, but the kvm_get_pfn/kvm_release_pfn_clean pair will
>   1923		 * simply do nothing for reserved pfns.
>   1924		 *
>   1925		 * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
>   1926		 * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
>   1927		 * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
>   1928		 */ 
>   1929		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
>   1930	
>   1931		*p_pfn = pfn;
>   1932		return 0;
>   1933	}
>   1934	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27 16:41 [PATCH v7 00/17] follow_pfn and other iomap races Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] drm/exynos: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] drm/exynos: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for g2d cmdlists Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] misc/habana: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] misc/habana: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for userptr Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-22 16:07   ` Oded Gabbay
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] media: videobuf2: Move frame_vector into media subsystem Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] mm: Close race in generic_access_phys Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] /dev/mem: Only set filp->f_mapping Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] sysfs: Support zapping of binary attr mmaps Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19  8:17   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19  8:17     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19  8:17     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19  8:17     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 14:32     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 14:32       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 14:32       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 14:34       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 14:34         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 14:34         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 15:20         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 15:20           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 15:20           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-19 16:03           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 16:03             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 16:03             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-03 16:14             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-03 16:14               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-03 16:14               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 10:23               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 10:23                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 10:23                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] mm: Add unsafe_follow_pfn Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] media/videobuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-19 12:24   ` Hans Verkuil
2021-01-19 12:24     ` Hans Verkuil
2021-01-19 12:24     ` Hans Verkuil
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn " Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] kvm: pass kvm argument to follow_pfn callsites Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] mm: add mmu_notifier argument to follow_pfn Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 16:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 19:10   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 19:10     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 19:10     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 19:10     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 19:10     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-30 14:28     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-11-30 14:28       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-30 14:28       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-30 14:28       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-30 18:03       ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-30 18:03         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-30 18:03         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-30 18:03         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-30 18:03         ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-12 13:24 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] follow_pfn and other iomap races Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 13:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-12 20:57   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-12 20:57     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-12 20:57     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130142820.GN401619@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.