All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho  Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201212135940.GD8946@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <248f928b-1383-48ea-8584-ec10146e60c9@nvidia.com>

Hi John,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:23PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 12/2/20 10:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ...
> > +#include "../kselftest.h"
> > +
> > +#define fail(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_fail(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> > +#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> > +
> > +#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Say, when I tried this out from today's linux-next, I had to delete the
> above line. In other words, the following was required in order to build:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> index 79578dfd13e6..c878c2b841fc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
> 
>  #ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> 
> -#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> -
>  #define PATTERN        0x55
> 
>  static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> 
> 
> ...and that makes sense to me, because:
> 
> a) secretmem.h is not in the uapi, which this selftests/vm build system
>    expects (it runs "make headers_install" for us, which is *not* going
>    to pick up items in the kernel include dirs), and
> 
> b) There is nothing in secretmem.h that this test uses, anyway! Just these:
> 
> bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page);
> bool secretmem_active(void);
> 
> 
> ...or am I just Doing It Wrong? :)

You are perfectly right, I had a stale header in uapi from the prevoius
versions, the include in the test remained from then.

@Andrew, can you please add the hunk above as a fixup?

> thanks,
> -- 
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201212135940.GD8946@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <248f928b-1383-48ea-8584-ec10146e60c9@nvidia.com>

Hi John,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:23PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 12/2/20 10:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ...
> > +#include "../kselftest.h"
> > +
> > +#define fail(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_fail(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> > +#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> > +
> > +#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Say, when I tried this out from today's linux-next, I had to delete the
> above line. In other words, the following was required in order to build:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> index 79578dfd13e6..c878c2b841fc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
> 
>  #ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> 
> -#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> -
>  #define PATTERN        0x55
> 
>  static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> 
> 
> ...and that makes sense to me, because:
> 
> a) secretmem.h is not in the uapi, which this selftests/vm build system
>    expects (it runs "make headers_install" for us, which is *not* going
>    to pick up items in the kernel include dirs), and
> 
> b) There is nothing in secretmem.h that this test uses, anyway! Just these:
> 
> bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page);
> bool secretmem_active(void);
> 
> 
> ...or am I just Doing It Wrong? :)

You are perfectly right, I had a stale header in uapi from the prevoius
versions, the include in the test remained from then.

@Andrew, can you please add the hunk above as a fixup?

> thanks,
> -- 
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201212135940.GD8946@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <248f928b-1383-48ea-8584-ec10146e60c9@nvidia.com>

Hi John,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:23PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 12/2/20 10:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ...
> > +#include "../kselftest.h"
> > +
> > +#define fail(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_fail(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> > +#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> > +
> > +#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Say, when I tried this out from today's linux-next, I had to delete the
> above line. In other words, the following was required in order to build:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> index 79578dfd13e6..c878c2b841fc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
> 
>  #ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> 
> -#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> -
>  #define PATTERN        0x55
> 
>  static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> 
> 
> ...and that makes sense to me, because:
> 
> a) secretmem.h is not in the uapi, which this selftests/vm build system
>    expects (it runs "make headers_install" for us, which is *not* going
>    to pick up items in the kernel include dirs), and
> 
> b) There is nothing in secretmem.h that this test uses, anyway! Just these:
> 
> bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page);
> bool secretmem_active(void);
> 
> 
> ...or am I just Doing It Wrong? :)

You are perfectly right, I had a stale header in uapi from the prevoius
versions, the include in the test remained from then.

@Andrew, can you please add the hunk above as a fixup?

> thanks,
> -- 
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201212135940.GD8946@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <248f928b-1383-48ea-8584-ec10146e60c9@nvidia.com>

Hi John,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:23PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 12/2/20 10:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ...
> > +#include "../kselftest.h"
> > +
> > +#define fail(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_fail(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> > +#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> > +
> > +#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Say, when I tried this out from today's linux-next, I had to delete the
> above line. In other words, the following was required in order to build:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> index 79578dfd13e6..c878c2b841fc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
> 
>  #ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
> 
> -#include <linux/secretmem.h>
> -
>  #define PATTERN        0x55
> 
>  static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> 
> 
> ...and that makes sense to me, because:
> 
> a) secretmem.h is not in the uapi, which this selftests/vm build system
>    expects (it runs "make headers_install" for us, which is *not* going
>    to pick up items in the kernel include dirs), and
> 
> b) There is nothing in secretmem.h that this test uses, anyway! Just these:
> 
> bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page);
> bool secretmem_active(void);
> 
> 
> ...or am I just Doing It Wrong? :)

You are perfectly right, I had a stale header in uapi from the prevoius
versions, the include in the test remained from then.

@Andrew, can you please add the hunk above as a fixup?

> thanks,
> -- 
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-03  6:29 [PATCH v14 00/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 01/10] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 02/10] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 03/10] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 04/10] set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 23:36   ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-06 11:28     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 05/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-19 20:22   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-19 20:22     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-19 20:22     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-19 20:22     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 15:05     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 15:05       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 15:05       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 15:05       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 16:02       ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 16:02         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 16:02         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 16:02         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 17:04         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 17:04           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 17:04           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-20 17:04           ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 06/10] secretmem: use PMD-size pages to amortize direct map fragmentation Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 07/10] secretmem: add memcg accounting Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 15:47   ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03 15:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03 15:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03 15:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03 15:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 08/10] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 09/10] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 23:39   ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:39     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:39     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 23:39     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-06 11:30     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:30       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:30       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-06 11:30       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-07 14:45   ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 14:45     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 14:45     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 14:45     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 14:45     ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 16:00     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-07 16:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-07 16:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-07 16:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-08  1:34       ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-08  1:34         ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-08  1:34         ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-08  1:34         ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03  6:29 ` [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2) Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03  6:29   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-12  6:16   ` John Hubbard
2020-12-12  6:16     ` John Hubbard
2020-12-12  6:16     ` John Hubbard
2020-12-12  6:16     ` John Hubbard
2020-12-12 13:59     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-12-12 13:59       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-12 13:59       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-12 13:59       ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201212135940.GD8946@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.