All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: switch to probe_new
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:04:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201213170453.2de3a963@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vc1HAndj0qPHFpW+-5Nikz+CqKwD9MWA0vWH3-FtXPvOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:26:17 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:01 AM Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Switch to the modern i2c probe_new callback and drop the i2c_device_id
> > array.  
> 
> First part is okay.
> The second is interesting. It depends if we would like to keep a
> possibility to instantiate devices from user space (strictly speaking
> it's an ABI breakage).
> 
We've also been bitten by this recently via greybus which does
it's instantiations using the i2c_device_id table as I understand it.
That's resulted in us reverting a few specific cases where we'd
done pretty much what you have done here.

So drop that part of the change.

Thanks,

Jonathan



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: switch to probe_new
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:04:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201213170453.2de3a963@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vc1HAndj0qPHFpW+-5Nikz+CqKwD9MWA0vWH3-FtXPvOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:26:17 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:01 AM Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Switch to the modern i2c probe_new callback and drop the i2c_device_id
> > array.  
> 
> First part is okay.
> The second is interesting. It depends if we would like to keep a
> possibility to instantiate devices from user space (strictly speaking
> it's an ABI breakage).
> 
We've also been bitten by this recently via greybus which does
it's instantiations using the i2c_device_id table as I understand it.
That's resulted in us reverting a few specific cases where we'd
done pretty much what you have done here.

So drop that part of the change.

Thanks,

Jonathan



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-13 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09 23:48 [PATCH 0/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: add ms5803 support Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: switch to probe_new Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-12 13:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-12 13:26     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-13 17:04     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-12-13 17:04       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: introduce hardware differentiation Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 17:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:12     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 19:51     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 19:51       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: limit available sample frequencies Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-12 18:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-12 18:26     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-13 17:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:17       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: rework CRC calculation helper Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: add support for alternative PROM layout Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 17:20   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 19:34     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 19:34       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: add ms5803 support Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11  3:34   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-11  3:34     ` Rob Herring
2020-12-11  8:08     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11  8:08       ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201213170453.2de3a963@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.