All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, edwin.verplanke@intel.com,
	cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/4] i40: consolidate handling of XDP program actions
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:33:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114143318.2171-5-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114143318.2171-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>

Consolidate the actions performed on the packet based on the XDP
program result into a separate function that is easier to read and
maintain. Simplify the i40e_construct_skb_zc function, so that the
input xdp buffer is always freed, regardless of whether the output
skb is successfully created or not. Simplify the behavior of the
i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc function, so that the current packet descriptor
is dropped when function i40_construct_skb_zc returns an error as
opposed to re-processing the same description on the next invocation.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 98 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
index 1167496a2e08..470b8600adb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
@@ -250,17 +250,70 @@ static struct sk_buff *i40e_construct_skb_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
 			       xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start,
 			       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
-		return NULL;
+		goto out;
 
 	skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
 	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), xdp->data, datasize);
 	if (metasize)
 		skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
 
+out:
 	xsk_buff_free(xdp);
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static void i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
+				      struct xdp_buff *xdp_buff,
+				      union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc,
+				      unsigned int *rx_packets,
+				      unsigned int *rx_bytes,
+				      unsigned int size,
+				      unsigned int xdp_res)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	*rx_packets = 1;
+	*rx_bytes = size;
+
+	if (likely(xdp_res == I40E_XDP_REDIR) || xdp_res == I40E_XDP_TX)
+		return;
+
+	if (xdp_res == I40E_XDP_CONSUMED) {
+		xsk_buff_free(xdp_buff);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (xdp_res == I40E_XDP_PASS) {
+		/* NB! We are not checking for errors using
+		 * i40e_test_staterr with
+		 * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that
+		 * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set).
+		 */
+		skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, xdp_buff);
+		if (!skb) {
+			rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++;
+			*rx_packets = 0;
+			*rx_bytes = 0;
+			return;
+		}
+
+		if (eth_skb_pad(skb)) {
+			*rx_packets = 0;
+			*rx_bytes = 0;
+			return;
+		}
+
+		*rx_bytes = skb->len;
+		i40e_process_skb_fields(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
+		napi_gro_receive(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi, skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Should never get here, as all valid cases have been handled already.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+}
+
 /**
  * i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc - Consumes Rx packets from the hardware ring
  * @rx_ring: Rx ring
@@ -276,10 +329,11 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 	u16 count_mask = rx_ring->count - 1;
 	unsigned int xdp_res, xdp_xmit = 0;
 	bool failure = false;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	while (likely(total_rx_packets < (unsigned int)budget)) {
 		union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc;
+		unsigned int rx_packets;
+		unsigned int rx_bytes;
 		struct xdp_buff *bi;
 		unsigned int size;
 		u64 qword;
@@ -313,42 +367,12 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 		xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool);
 
 		xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, bi);
-		if (xdp_res) {
-			if (xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR))
-				xdp_xmit |= xdp_res;
-			else
-				xsk_buff_free(bi);
-
-			total_rx_bytes += size;
-			total_rx_packets++;
-
-			next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/* XDP_PASS path */
-
-		/* NB! We are not checking for errors using
-		 * i40e_test_staterr with
-		 * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that
-		 * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set).
-		 */
-		skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, bi);
-		if (!skb) {
-			rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++;
-			break;
-		}
-
+		i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(rx_ring, bi, rx_desc, &rx_packets,
+					  &rx_bytes, size, xdp_res);
+		total_rx_packets += rx_packets;
+		total_rx_bytes += rx_bytes;
+		xdp_xmit |= xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR);
 		next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask;
-
-		if (eth_skb_pad(skb))
-			continue;
-
-		total_rx_bytes += skb->len;
-		total_rx_packets++;
-
-		i40e_process_skb_fields(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
-		napi_gro_receive(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi, skb);
 	}
 
 	rx_ring->next_to_clean = next_to_clean;
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 4/4] i40: consolidate handling of XDP program actions
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:33:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114143318.2171-5-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114143318.2171-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>

Consolidate the actions performed on the packet based on the XDP
program result into a separate function that is easier to read and
maintain. Simplify the i40e_construct_skb_zc function, so that the
input xdp buffer is always freed, regardless of whether the output
skb is successfully created or not. Simplify the behavior of the
i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc function, so that the current packet descriptor
is dropped when function i40_construct_skb_zc returns an error as
opposed to re-processing the same description on the next invocation.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 98 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
index 1167496a2e08..470b8600adb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
@@ -250,17 +250,70 @@ static struct sk_buff *i40e_construct_skb_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
 			       xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start,
 			       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
-		return NULL;
+		goto out;
 
 	skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
 	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), xdp->data, datasize);
 	if (metasize)
 		skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
 
+out:
 	xsk_buff_free(xdp);
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static void i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
+				      struct xdp_buff *xdp_buff,
+				      union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc,
+				      unsigned int *rx_packets,
+				      unsigned int *rx_bytes,
+				      unsigned int size,
+				      unsigned int xdp_res)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	*rx_packets = 1;
+	*rx_bytes = size;
+
+	if (likely(xdp_res == I40E_XDP_REDIR) || xdp_res == I40E_XDP_TX)
+		return;
+
+	if (xdp_res == I40E_XDP_CONSUMED) {
+		xsk_buff_free(xdp_buff);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (xdp_res == I40E_XDP_PASS) {
+		/* NB! We are not checking for errors using
+		 * i40e_test_staterr with
+		 * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that
+		 * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set).
+		 */
+		skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, xdp_buff);
+		if (!skb) {
+			rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++;
+			*rx_packets = 0;
+			*rx_bytes = 0;
+			return;
+		}
+
+		if (eth_skb_pad(skb)) {
+			*rx_packets = 0;
+			*rx_bytes = 0;
+			return;
+		}
+
+		*rx_bytes = skb->len;
+		i40e_process_skb_fields(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
+		napi_gro_receive(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi, skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Should never get here, as all valid cases have been handled already.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+}
+
 /**
  * i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc - Consumes Rx packets from the hardware ring
  * @rx_ring: Rx ring
@@ -276,10 +329,11 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 	u16 count_mask = rx_ring->count - 1;
 	unsigned int xdp_res, xdp_xmit = 0;
 	bool failure = false;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	while (likely(total_rx_packets < (unsigned int)budget)) {
 		union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc;
+		unsigned int rx_packets;
+		unsigned int rx_bytes;
 		struct xdp_buff *bi;
 		unsigned int size;
 		u64 qword;
@@ -313,42 +367,12 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 		xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool);
 
 		xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, bi);
-		if (xdp_res) {
-			if (xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR))
-				xdp_xmit |= xdp_res;
-			else
-				xsk_buff_free(bi);
-
-			total_rx_bytes += size;
-			total_rx_packets++;
-
-			next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/* XDP_PASS path */
-
-		/* NB! We are not checking for errors using
-		 * i40e_test_staterr with
-		 * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that
-		 * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set).
-		 */
-		skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, bi);
-		if (!skb) {
-			rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++;
-			break;
-		}
-
+		i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(rx_ring, bi, rx_desc, &rx_packets,
+					  &rx_bytes, size, xdp_res);
+		total_rx_packets += rx_packets;
+		total_rx_bytes += rx_bytes;
+		xdp_xmit |= xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR);
 		next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask;
-
-		if (eth_skb_pad(skb))
-			continue;
-
-		total_rx_bytes += skb->len;
-		total_rx_packets++;
-
-		i40e_process_skb_fields(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
-		napi_gro_receive(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi, skb);
 	}
 
 	rx_ring->next_to_clean = next_to_clean;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 14:33 [PATCH net-next 0/4] i40e: small improvements on XDP path Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] i40e: remove unnecessary memory writes of the next to clean pointer Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] i40e: remove unnecessary cleaned_count updates Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: remove the redundant buffer info updates Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 14:33 ` Cristian Dumitrescu [this message]
2021-01-14 14:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 4/4] i40: consolidate handling of XDP program actions Cristian Dumitrescu
2021-01-14 22:59 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] i40e: small improvements on XDP path Saeed Mahameed
2021-01-14 22:59   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Saeed Mahameed
2021-01-18  7:24 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-01-18  7:31 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-01-18  7:31   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson
2021-01-18 18:32   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-18 18:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-07 22:11     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-05-07 22:11       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-05-07 22:53       ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-05-07 22:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nguyen, Anthony L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114143318.2171-5-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edwin.verplanke@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.