From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Cc: <dledford@redhat.com>, <leon@kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/12] RDMA/hns: Several fixes and cleanups of RQ/SRQ
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:43:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208234323.GA1225977@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611997090-48820-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:57:58PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> There are some issues when using SRQ on HIP08/HIP09, the first part of this
> series is some fixes on them.
>
> In addition, the codes about RQ/SRQ including the creation and post recv
> flow are a bit hard to understand, they need to be refactored.
>
> Lang Cheng (2):
> RDMA/hns: Allocate one more recv SGE for HIP08
> RDMA/hns: Use new interfaces to write SRQC
>
> Wenpeng Liang (8):
> RDMA/hns: Bugfix for checking whether the srq is full when post wr
> RDMA/hns: Force srq_limit to 0 when creating SRQ
> RDMA/hns: Fixed wrong judgments in the goto branch
> RDMA/hns: Remove the reserved WQE of SRQ
> RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_create_srq()
> RDMA/hns: Refactor code about SRQ Context
> RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_post_srq_recv()
> RDMA/hns: Add verification of QP type when post_recv
>
> Xi Wang (2):
> RDMA/hns: Refactor post recv flow
> RDMA/hns: Clear remaining unused sges when post_recv
Applied to for-next, thanks
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-30 8:57 [PATCH for-next 00/12] RDMA/hns: Several fixes and cleanups of RQ/SRQ Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:57 ` [PATCH for-next 01/12] RDMA/hns: Allocate one more recv SGE for HIP08 Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 02/12] RDMA/hns: Bugfix for checking whether the srq is full when post wr Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 03/12] RDMA/hns: Force srq_limit to 0 when creating SRQ Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 04/12] RDMA/hns: Fixed wrong judgments in the goto branch Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 05/12] RDMA/hns: Remove the reserved WQE of SRQ Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 06/12] RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_create_srq() Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 07/12] RDMA/hns: Refactor code about SRQ Context Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 08/12] RDMA/hns: Use new interfaces to write SRQC Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 09/12] RDMA/hns: Refactor post recv flow Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 10/12] RDMA/hns: Clear remaining unused sges when post_recv Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 11/12] RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_post_srq_recv() Weihang Li
2021-01-30 8:58 ` [PATCH for-next 12/12] RDMA/hns: Add verification of QP type when post_recv Weihang Li
2021-02-08 23:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208234323.GA1225977@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.