All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/5] s390x: css: testing measurement block format 0
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:12:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210212121245.061058ba.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1612963214-30397-5-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:20:13 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> We tests the update of the mesurement block format 0, the

s/tests/test/
s/mesurement/measurement/

> mesurement block origin is calculated from the mbo argument
> used by the SCHM instruction and the offset calculated using
> the measurement block index of the SCHIB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/css.h | 14 +++++++++++++
>  s390x/css.c     | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
> 

(...)

> +static void test_schm_fmt0(void)
> +{
> +	struct measurement_block_format0 *mb0;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("Format 0");
> +
> +	mb0 = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(struct measurement_block_format0), 0);
> +	if (!mb0) {
> +		report_abort("measurement_block_format0 allocation failed");
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
> +	schm(NULL, 0); /* Clear previous MB address */

I think it would be better to clean out the mb after a particular test
has run, so that the following tests can start with a clean slate.

> +	schm(mb0, SCHM_MBU);
>  
> +	/* Expect error for non aligned MB */
> +	report_prefix_push("Unaligned MB index");
> +	report_xfail(start_measure(0, 0x01, false), mb0->ssch_rsch_count != 0,
> +		     "SSCH measured %d", mb0->ssch_rsch_count);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	memset(mb0, 0, sizeof(*mb0));
> +
> +	/* Expect success */
> +	report_prefix_push("Valid MB address and index");
> +	report(start_measure(0, 0, false) &&
> +	       mb0->ssch_rsch_count == SCHM_UPDATE_CNT,
> +	       "SSCH measured %d", mb0->ssch_rsch_count);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	free_io_mem(mb0, sizeof(struct measurement_block_format0));

Before you free the memory, you really need to stop measurements
again... even though nothing happens right now, because you're not doing
I/O after this point.

> +end:
> +	report_prefix_pop();
>  }
>  
>  static struct {
> @@ -202,6 +256,7 @@ static struct {
>  	{ "enable (msch)", test_enable },
>  	{ "sense (ssch/tsch)", test_sense },
>  	{ "measurement block (schm)", test_schm },
> +	{ "measurement block format0", test_schm_fmt0 },
>  	{ NULL, NULL }
>  };
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10 13:20 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/5] CSS Mesurement Block Pierre Morel
2021-02-10 13:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/5] s390x: css: Store CSS Characteristics Pierre Morel
2021-02-12 10:32   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-12 15:35     ` Pierre Morel
2021-02-10 13:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/5] s390x: css: simplifications of the tests Pierre Morel
2021-02-12 10:36   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-12 15:36     ` Pierre Morel
2021-02-10 13:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/5] s390x: css: implementing Set CHannel Monitor Pierre Morel
2021-02-12 10:53   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-12 15:51     ` Pierre Morel
2021-02-10 13:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/5] s390x: css: testing measurement block format 0 Pierre Morel
2021-02-12 11:12   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-02-12 15:59     ` Pierre Morel
2021-02-10 13:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/5] s390x: css: testing measurement block format 1 Pierre Morel
2021-02-12 11:15   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-12 16:04     ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210212121245.061058ba.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.