[RFC v11 24/25] intel_iommu: process PASID-based Device-TLB invalidation

From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, jun.j.tian@intel.com,
	yi.y.sun@intel.com, hao.wu@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Lingshan.Zhu@intel.com, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC v11 24/25] intel_iommu: process PASID-based Device-TLB invalidation
Date: Wed,  3 Mar 2021 04:38:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302203827.437645-25-yi.l.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302203827.437645-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com>

This patch adds an empty handling for PASID-based Device-TLB
invalidation. For now it is enough as it is not necessary to
propagate it to host for passthru device and also there is no
emulated device has device tlb.

Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 915db7ad1f..932c235f37 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -3258,6 +3258,17 @@ static bool vtd_process_inv_iec_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
     return true;
 }
 
+static bool vtd_process_device_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
+                                           VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
+{
+    /*
+     * no need to handle it for passthru device, for emulated
+     * devices with device tlb, it may be required, but for now,
+     * return is enough
+     */
+    return true;
+}
+
 static bool vtd_process_device_iotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
                                           VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
 {
@@ -3380,6 +3391,13 @@ static bool vtd_process_inv_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s)
         }
         break;
 
+    case VTD_INV_DESC_DEV_PIOTLB:
+        trace_vtd_inv_desc("device-piotlb", inv_desc.hi, inv_desc.lo);
+        if (!vtd_process_device_piotlb_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        break;
+
     case VTD_INV_DESC_DEVICE:
         trace_vtd_inv_desc("device", inv_desc.hi, inv_desc.lo);
         if (!vtd_process_device_iotlb_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
index 7fbdd53b60..be29f3672b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
 #define VTD_INV_DESC_WAIT               0x5 /* Invalidation Wait Descriptor */
 #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB             0x6 /* PASID-IOTLB Invalidate Desc */
 #define VTD_INV_DESC_PC                 0x7 /* PASID-cache Invalidate Desc */
+#define VTD_INV_DESC_DEV_PIOTLB         0x8 /* PASID-based-DIOTLB inv_desc*/
 #define VTD_INV_DESC_NONE               0   /* Not an Invalidate Descriptor */
 
 /* Masks for Invalidation Wait Descriptor*/
-- 
2.25.1

